Sentences with phrase «lower pixel density of»

This means it will feature a slightly lower pixel density of 386ppi.

This means that you get a lower pixel density of just 267ppi as opposed to the 401ppi you get with the ZenFone 3 and G4 Plus.

It is also AMOLED technology and it too has a Quad HD resolution for a slightly lower pixel density of 518ppi.

The LG Bello on the other hand features a larger 5 - inch 854x480 pixel display, that makes for an even lower pixel density of 196ppi.

The Nexus 5X comes with a slightly larger 5.2 - inch IPS LCD screen, also with a 1080p resolution, resulting in a slightly lower pixel density of 424 ppi — a difference that you will be hard - pressed to notice.

The Galaxy S8 +, however, pales in front of the Pixel XL with a slightly lower pixel density of 529ppi.

However, the iPad, by comparison has a large 9.7 - inch display, with a lower pixel density of 132, although the interface has been designed for it, so to a certain extent, the shoe fits better.

Against this Samsung brings the titular 10.1 - inch touchscreen, it's a PLS TFT capacitive at the same resolution as its competitor, resulting in a lower pixel density of 149ppi.

The real estate on the device is quite large at 5.5 - inch with a resolution of 720p, which adds up to a low pixel density of 267PPI (Pixel Per Inch).

Both the Galaxy Tab A 8.0 and the Galaxy Tab A 9.7 feature TFT touchscreens with the identical resolution of 1024 x 768, resulting in unfortunately low pixel densities of 160 ppi and 132 ppi respectively.

Not exact matches

Personally I'm not a fan of this smartphone as I feel phones of this size are best left to the feature phone department as the screen (2.8 inches) is just too small with a low resolution and pixel density display.

On the other hand, the higher Pixels Per Inch lowers the Display Power Efficiency because at higher densities the LCD Backplane circuitry proportionally blocks more of the Backlight.

The screen is 3.5 inches diagonally and has a medium - resolution medium - density 480x320 pixel display with a screen Aspect Ratio of 1.50, which is lower than the Nexus One's 1.67, and also lower than standard widescreen displays, which have an Aspect Ratio of 1.78.

The screen is 3.7 inches diagonally and has a high - resolution high - density 800x480 pixel display with a screen Aspect Ratio of 1.67, which is higher than the iPhone's 1.50, but lower than standard widescreen displays, which have an Aspect Ratio of 1.78.

One of the ways it offsets the low pixel density is via the HDMI out which gives you 1080P video if you hook it up to a projector or your television.

Due to the larger dimensions of the screen, the pixel density on the Note 2 display is significantly lower than the Galaxy S3's, at 267 ppi.

This also seems like a particularly low resolution for an Apple product, especially since Apple's third - generation iPad set new standards for tablet displays with its density of 264 pixels per inch.

It's a capacitive TFT with multitouch support and a resolution which is slightly lower than its rival at 600x1024 pixels, giving a mediocre pixel density of 170ppi.

By comparison, the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet has a slightly smaller 10.1 - inch display but a slightly lower resolution at 2560 x 1600 pixels to offer a pixel density of a slightly softer 298ppi.

What's odd is that using the lower pixel density shows you the Android 3.1 user interface on the Dell Streak 7, while a pixel density of 170ppi or higher shows you the Gingerbreaa UI.

The 2013 iteration of the Nexus 7 comes with the record for a tablet 323ppi pixel density, quad - core processor, 2 GB of RAM and 5 MP camera on the back, all for the low starting price of $ 230, cementing its place in the tablet hall of fame.

The screen is 3.5 inches diagonally and has a high - resolution high - density 960x640 pixel display with a screen Aspect Ratio of 1.50, which is identical to iPhone 3GS, but a bit lower than the other smartphones, which have Aspect Ratios between 1.67 and 1.78, the same as a 16:9 HDTV.

The 4.7 - inch Super AMOLED screen only has a 1,280 × 720 pixel resolution with a density of 312ppi (pixels per inch), which is lower than the 326ppi screen in the iPhone 6 and 5S.

Upon first inspection you'd probably assume that the A3's display was of the 720P variety, as the low 245 PPI pixel density is only really noticeable when consuming lots of media.

That's an impressive length of time (anything over 8 hours is good) that's likely owed to the not - very - bright and small display, also its lower pixel density.

All of this poster's points are true: the phone does have a great, bright screen despite its relatively low pixel density — something that I don't notice at all during day - to - day use.

The standard Mate 9 features a 5.9 - inch Full HD display for a pixel density of 373ppi, which although is sharper than the preceding Mate 8, it is still quite low for this size device.

The Swift 2's 5 - inch IPS screen has a 720p resolution and a pixel density of 294 pixels per inch, which is quite low when compared to leading Android phones — and many other low and mid-range challengers, like the Moto G5.

In addition, the cameras are usually of lower (but generally passable) quality, and the screens don't commonly have the high pixel density, super-sharp displays of current - generation handsets.

Since the resolution hasn't gone - up though, the new Moto G's pixel density is lower than that of the original Moto G.

The Moto E packs decent specifications for its low price like a Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 SoC and a 4.3 - inch qHD (960 x 540) display with a pixel density of 256 PPI.

Its resolution is lower than the Mate 10 however, at 1920 x 1080 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 373ppi.

On the other hand, the ASUS ZenFone 4 Pro is expected to feature a slightly larger 5.7 - inch Super AMOLED display with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a pixel density of around 515ppi, as well as the top - tier Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC housing four high - performance Kryo cores clocked at up to 2.35 GHz and an additional low - power Kryo cores operating at a frequency of up to 1.9 GHz.

The resolution is lower than the Mate 10 however, at 2160 x 1080 pixels, for a pixel density of 402ppi.

By comparison, the Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet has a slightly smaller 10.1 - inch display but a slightly lower resolution at 2560 x 1600 pixels to offer a pixel density of a slightly softer 298ppi.

Despite the low display resolution of 720p it manages to offer good color outputs, and well a pixel density of 267 PPI (Pixel Per Inch) isn'tpixel density of 267 PPI (Pixel Per Inch) isn'tPixel Per Inch) isn't bad.

As expected, however, the high density of the sensor's pixel array is a liability in low light.

The confirmed pixel density of the screen is 564 ppi, which is slightly lower than the Samsung Galaxy S7's 577 ppi but is undeniably bigger than the G5's 554 ppi.

The 278ppi pixel density is lower than that of Samsung's offering but higher than that offered by the Moto 360 II.

The combination of the mere size of the screen and the Full HD resolution result in the lower pixel density.

Videos and pictures on the 1,080 p screen look jagged, a symptom of the screen's low pixel density (about 220 pixels per inch).

The pixel density of Ulefone's Power 3 does seem a bit low and it simply isn't going to render graphics for the most intensive games as well as some more expensive devices will.