Sentences with phrase «lower pixels per inch»

This is due in part to its lower pixels per inch, which affects the display's power efficiency, but it is also the result of using higher efficiency White LEDs and optical stack in the Surface Pro 3 display.

In particular, the coarse and heavily pixelated low resolution and low pixels per inch screen made worse with poor anti-aliasing, the very low color depth, the poor color gamut in ambient light, and also the poor viewing angle performance (because watches are not easily positioned for zero degree viewing).

Not exact matches

The iPhone X has a very high resolution 2.5 K 2436x1125 pixel display with 458 pixels per inch (ppi) producing images that look perfectly sharp with normal 20/20 Vision under all normal viewing conditions, which always includes some ambient light that always lowers the visible image contrast and perceived image sharpness (Modulation Transfer MTF).

The Galaxy S9 has a very high resolution 3K 2960x1440 pixel display with 570 pixels per inch (ppi) producing images that look perfectly sharp with normal 20/20 Vision under all normal viewing conditions, which always includes some ambient light that always lowers the visible image contrast and perceived image sharpness (Modulation Transfer MTF).

The screen's 267 pixels per inch (ppi) is Excellent for a full size Tablet, a trifle higher than the 264 ppi for the Apple iPad Air 2 and iPad Pro (so the Surface Pro 4 is what Apple classifies as a Retina Display), but slightly lower than the record high 287 ppi for the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 inch Tablet.

While the Kindle boasts «stunning HD display with 30 % more pixels than iPad mini,» 216 pixels per inch, the ability to watch HD movies and TV, dual stereo speakers and «ultra-fast MINI Wi - Fi,» the iPad has «standard definition, low - resolution display,» 163 pixels per inch, no HD movies or TV and a mono speaker, according to the ad.

This gives the KEYone about 433 pixels per inch, which may sound rather low, but the 4.5 - inch panel here is definitely sharp.

The screen's 216 pixels per inch (ppi) is very good but somewhat lower than on other full size tablets, like the Apple iPad Air with 264 ppi and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 with 287 ppi.

The Galaxy Note8 has a very high resolution 3K 2960x1440 pixel display with 521 pixels per inch (ppi) producing images that look perfectly sharp with normal 20/20 Vision under all normal viewing conditions, which always includes some ambient light that always lowers the visible image contrast and perceived image sharpness (Modulation Transfer MTF).

The new 150 pixel per inch (150 ppi) backplane was made at low temperatures (less than 100 °C) using Plastic Logic's Organic Thin Film Transistor (OTFT) technology.

However, the primary differences come down to its much smaller Screen Size (4.0 versus 4.7 to 5.0 inches), much lower Pixel Resolution (1136x640 versus 1920x1080), much lower total number of Pixels (0.7 versus 2.1 Mega Pixels), and much lower Pixels Per Inch (326 versus 443 to 468).

The display immediately seems like a budget component with a 7 inch 800 x 1280 IPS LCD with a pretty low pixel - per - inch count of 216 ppi.

If the resolution is low, that means there are fewer pixels per inch, which means each pixel is automatically made larger.

For 2010, the original iPad had a leading edge 1024x768 display with 132 pixels - per - inch (ppi) and a small - ish 62 percent color gamut that had noticeably lower color saturation.

This also seems like a particularly low resolution for an Apple product, especially since Apple's third - generation iPad set new standards for tablet displays with its density of 264 pixels per inch.

The slightly larger 5.1 ″ Super AMOLED display is the same resolution as its predecessor, and being larger means that the pixels - per - inch count is lower at 432 ppi vs. 441 ppi.

The 10.1 - inch, 1,280 - by -800-pixel IPS display is disappointingly low - res by today's standards, and the resulting 149 pixels per inch looks choppy, especially with text - heavy websites or apps.

It's unfair to compare the Fire tablet's low 171 pixel per inch (PPI) screen with that of a $ 100 and higher tablet, so I won't.

Online images must have low resolution no greater than 72 dpi, with neither the length nor the height of the image being greater than 4 inches, for a total of 1200 pixels per inch.

The 4.7 - inch Super AMOLED screen only has a 1,280 × 720 pixel resolution with a density of 312ppi (pixels per inch), which is lower than the 326ppi screen in the iPhone 6 and 5S.

In fact, the 264 pixels per inch was a lower density than on the iPhone.

KGI Securities analyst Ming - Chi Kuo, who first predicted Apple would introduce a low - cost LCD iPhone, believes the device will feature a display with 320 to 330 pixels per inch and a price tag that comes in at $ 700 to $ 800, similar to the iPhone 8 and the iPhone 8 Plus.

The effective pixels - per - inch are lower than on a 1080p LCD panel, mind you, given that the pentile matrix of the phone's AMOLED display results in lower effective color resolution because of the uneven colored subpixels arrangement.

It has a 5 - inch display with lower resolution, resulting in 441 pixels per inch.

The Swift 2's 5 - inch IPS screen has a 720p resolution and a pixel density of 294 pixels per inch, which is quite low when compared to leading Android phones — and many other low and mid-range challengers, like the Moto G5.

The Galaxy S7 has a 5.1 - inch Super AMOLED Quad HD screen, 12 - megapixel dual pixel camera that works much better in low light conditions than its predecessor and has faster autofocus, and its processing is 30 per cent faster than the SGS6, with a 64 per cent faster GPU too.

Still, it's lower than the nearly 360 pixels per inch Samsung crammed onto the Super AMOLED screen on its Galaxy Tab S 8.4.

Given its size, that 720p resolution is definitely on the low side, working out to 258 pixels per inch.

As a result, the pixel density is slightly lower at 386 pixels per inch but the Super AMOLED display does mean black and colours are deeper and more vibrant.

The real estate on the device is quite large at 5.5 - inch with a resolution of 720p, which adds up to a low pixel density of 267PPI (Pixel Per Ipixel density of 267PPI (Pixel Per IPixel Per Inch).

It's a 1.5 - inch LCD affair, which is already a disappointing note, but then add in the low resolution resulting in 240 pixels per inch and a cut at the bottom of the display, things get worse.

Videos and pictures on the 1,080 p screen look jagged, a symptom of the screen's low pixel density (about 220 pixels per inch).