Sentences with phrase «lower right graph»

In the lower right graph, hot nights are defined as nights with a minimum temperature higher than 98 % of the minimum temperatures between 1971 and 2000.»

Not exact matches

Next, look to the right of the graph, and what's happened since 2015 — global prices have come into much closer balance, with Japanese import prices recovering a bit recently but still sitting about $ 7 / GJ above Alberta and B.C. gas prices, which are at near - historic lows.
But given the rebound in optimism, the jump proved short - lived, so that most of the time volatilities (ie median volatilities) were low relative to historical benchmarks and roughly in line with developments in 2006 (Graph 3, right - hand panel).
This initiated a further decline in 10 - year government bond yields, which fell to all - time lows for nine large euro area countries including France, Ireland and Spain by 26 November, the end of the period under review (Graph 5, right - hand panel).
The MOVE index suggested that US Treasury volatility was expected to be very low, while the flat swaption skew for the 10 - year Treasury note denoted a low demand to hedge higher interest rate risks, even on the eve of the inception of the Fed's balance sheet normalization (Graph 9, right - hand panel).
Under the FY 2018 request, NIH also projects a success rate of 13.7 percent in FY 2018, the lowest funding rate since at least 1970 (see graph at right for recent years).
(TIPS bond yields are significantly lower than 2 % right now, as the graph below shows, so you can't do that today.
Most of the time the curve or graph will start in the lower left and rise to the upper right.
SEYMOUR, David «Chim» Page from an unpublished book, c. 1948 Three gelatin silver print mounted on green graph paper Upper left print size: 3 3/8 x 2 1/4 inches Upper right print size: 3 3/8 x 2 1/4 inches Lower right: 7 1/4 x 4 3/4 inches Mount: 11 x 7 1/4 inches
In everyday life, lines supposedly give us «safety» and «orientation», indicate or show us a direction, create connections and provide a basis — at least, we assume this to be so... And yes, as a matter of fact, in notebooks or on graph paper, the lines are already there, and our (western) culture then prescribes the direction (from top left to lower right).
My contribution had its ups and downs — a low point was definitely when Judge Alsup declared «your chart sucks» in response to a powerpoint slide (right) which showed an artist's impression of the Nimbus 4 satellite at the expense of a graph of how the spectrum of outgoing long wave radiation changed in response to rising greenhouse gases between 1970 and 1997.
A big driver of the outbreaks of record cold and snow in many spots around the Northern Hemisphere is the little blue dot at the lower right - hand corner of the graph above, just above the year 2010.
The time - series graphs show that observations are pretty much right on the CMIP3 trend, and only a tick lower relative to the forcing - adjusted CMIP5 trend.
Look at the lower right - hand corner of the graph above to see a blue dot signifying current conditions.
But the models fail to capture the polar - amplified cooling in the Arctic from 1945 to 1975 (upper right - hand graph), and they definitely do not show the polar - amplified warming that occurred from 1914 to 1945 (lower left - hand graph).
I then show the most recent poll from the 6 Americas graphed out from most motivated, most concerned, and highest belief in global warming on the left to least concerned, least motivated, and lowest level of belief on the right.
Guess which year between 2006 and 2016 had the latest start to freeze - up on Hudson Bay, given that 2012 had the lowest September average and 2007 and 2016 tied for second - lowest (see graph below, from NSIDC), and that sea ice in the Arctic right now is the lowest it's been for this date since 1979?
It included the graph on the right which shows clearly that the carbon tax that the PM removed was working to lower emissions.
This graph displays the close connection between the global angular momentum of the atmosphere derived from wind analyses (darker red curve, scale on right) and the observed changes in the length of day (lighter green curve, scale on left), after removing low frequencies, for the years 2000/2001.
It is the graph on the lower right.
The lower graph at the right, from An Introduction to Peak Oil (Phil Hart, original data attributed to ExxonMobil), shows that the total size of the oil fields discovered world - wide has tended to decline since about 1965.
I don't suppose you noticed the reference in the lower right corner of the pretty graph?
I realize the first graphic is attributed to Wikipedia, but I am used to wavelength graphs with the longer wavelengths (lower frequency) on the left and shorter wavelengths (higher frequency) on the right.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z