In
the lower right graph, hot nights are defined as nights with a minimum temperature higher than 98 % of the minimum temperatures between 1971 and 2000.»
Not exact matches
Next, look to the
right of the
graph, and what's happened since 2015 — global prices have come into much closer balance, with Japanese import prices recovering a bit recently but still sitting about $ 7 / GJ above Alberta and B.C. gas prices, which are at near - historic
lows.
But given the rebound in optimism, the jump proved short - lived, so that most of the time volatilities (ie median volatilities) were
low relative to historical benchmarks and roughly in line with developments in 2006 (
Graph 3,
right - hand panel).
This initiated a further decline in 10 - year government bond yields, which fell to all - time
lows for nine large euro area countries including France, Ireland and Spain by 26 November, the end of the period under review (
Graph 5,
right - hand panel).
The MOVE index suggested that US Treasury volatility was expected to be very
low, while the flat swaption skew for the 10 - year Treasury note denoted a
low demand to hedge higher interest rate risks, even on the eve of the inception of the Fed's balance sheet normalization (
Graph 9,
right - hand panel).
Under the FY 2018 request, NIH also projects a success rate of 13.7 percent in FY 2018, the
lowest funding rate since at least 1970 (see
graph at
right for recent years).
(TIPS bond yields are significantly
lower than 2 %
right now, as the
graph below shows, so you can't do that today.
Most of the time the curve or
graph will start in the
lower left and rise to the upper
right.
SEYMOUR, David «Chim» Page from an unpublished book, c. 1948 Three gelatin silver print mounted on green
graph paper Upper left print size: 3 3/8 x 2 1/4 inches Upper
right print size: 3 3/8 x 2 1/4 inches
Lower right: 7 1/4 x 4 3/4 inches Mount: 11 x 7 1/4 inches
In everyday life, lines supposedly give us «safety» and «orientation», indicate or show us a direction, create connections and provide a basis — at least, we assume this to be so... And yes, as a matter of fact, in notebooks or on
graph paper, the lines are already there, and our (western) culture then prescribes the direction (from top left to
lower right).
My contribution had its ups and downs — a
low point was definitely when Judge Alsup declared «your chart sucks» in response to a powerpoint slide (
right) which showed an artist's impression of the Nimbus 4 satellite at the expense of a
graph of how the spectrum of outgoing long wave radiation changed in response to rising greenhouse gases between 1970 and 1997.
A big driver of the outbreaks of record cold and snow in many spots around the Northern Hemisphere is the little blue dot at the
lower right - hand corner of the
graph above, just above the year 2010.
The time - series
graphs show that observations are pretty much
right on the CMIP3 trend, and only a tick
lower relative to the forcing - adjusted CMIP5 trend.
Look at the
lower right - hand corner of the
graph above to see a blue dot signifying current conditions.
But the models fail to capture the polar - amplified cooling in the Arctic from 1945 to 1975 (upper
right - hand
graph), and they definitely do not show the polar - amplified warming that occurred from 1914 to 1945 (
lower left - hand
graph).
I then show the most recent poll from the 6 Americas
graphed out from most motivated, most concerned, and highest belief in global warming on the left to least concerned, least motivated, and
lowest level of belief on the
right.
Guess which year between 2006 and 2016 had the latest start to freeze - up on Hudson Bay, given that 2012 had the
lowest September average and 2007 and 2016 tied for second -
lowest (see
graph below, from NSIDC), and that sea ice in the Arctic
right now is the
lowest it's been for this date since 1979?
It included the
graph on the
right which shows clearly that the carbon tax that the PM removed was working to
lower emissions.
This
graph displays the close connection between the global angular momentum of the atmosphere derived from wind analyses (darker red curve, scale on
right) and the observed changes in the length of day (lighter green curve, scale on left), after removing
low frequencies, for the years 2000/2001.
It is the
graph on the
lower right.
The
lower graph at the
right, from An Introduction to Peak Oil (Phil Hart, original data attributed to ExxonMobil), shows that the total size of the oil fields discovered world - wide has tended to decline since about 1965.
I don't suppose you noticed the reference in the
lower right corner of the pretty
graph?
I realize the first graphic is attributed to Wikipedia, but I am used to wavelength
graphs with the longer wavelengths (
lower frequency) on the left and shorter wavelengths (higher frequency) on the
right.