Not exact matches
Sacrifices that have long - term benefits are unlikely to be undertaken unless the
social discount rate is much
lower [e.g., ~ 0.5 % per year] than any
rate we can currently motivate empirically.»
It should be «The
social cost of carbon rises sharply for
lower discount rates.»
My general view is that, while Stern's choice of
discount rate is at the
low end, the Review badly underestimates the
social cost of the damage to natural ecosystems that will inevitably arise from global warming.
This
lower discount rate translates into a considerable increase in the
social cost of carbon emissions, and hence even greater impetus to mitigate climate change.