Not exact matches
Districts could already seek a waiver to serve grains foods that aren't «whole grain - rich,» and while some advocates are upset that there won't be further sodium reductions (at least for now),
school food is still
lower in salt
than it was pre-HHFKA.
Teachers in the
district's three
schools are paid about $ 12,000 more
than the state average, and the
schools offer an array of top - notch educational opportunities, including
low class size, foreign language instruction, fine arts and orchestra programs,
low - cost preschool and a full - day kindergarten, before - and after -
school care, and several extracurricular sports teams.
For example, what if
districts with
lower property values received more federal reimbursement dollars for
school meals
than districts with higher property values, with the affluent
districts making up the difference via a higher lunch price for paying students?
Finally, the big savings from P2 are really only realized if your entire
district is very
low income; implementing it in just a few very
low income
schools within a
district which is less
than 85 %
low income may not save much.
«Although
school districts more reliant on state aid derive a greater benefit from the current environment of
low levy growth and increased state revenues, property taxes have traditionally been a more stable source of revenue
than state aid.
The state's tax cap, which exempts New York City, makes it difficult for localities and
school districts to raise property taxes by more
than 2 percent or the rate of inflation, whichever is
lower.
It requires
school districts to limit the increase in their tax levy — the total amount of taxes they collect — to not more
than 2 percent or the inflation rate, whichever is
lower.
The Hamburg Central
School District's proposed budget carries a tax increase for the first time in three years, but the tax levy is
lower than four years ago.
The
schools in the
district remain considerably diverse, and while there is evidence of a slight growth in racial segregation, Jefferson County's policy is more effective
than most, with segregation levels remaining considerably
lower than most large
school districts.
These studies show, consistently, that parental
schools of choice not controlled by public
school districts 1) are usually prohibited by law from screening out students based on admission exams, 2) use ability tracking less frequently
than traditional public
schools even when, legally, they can, and 3) may use ability tracking, but when they do, it is less likely to have a negative effect on the achievement of
low - track students.
The
lower - spending half of successful
districts spent 50 percent less
than the higher - spending
districts, proving that many good
schools do quite well with much less
than other
schools.
She is more determined
than ever to work on behalf of the children that she feels are affected most by the failures of the current system: those educated in inner - city,
lower - income, ethnic - minority majority public
school districts.
In addition, it wasn't particularly well aligned with the
district's other main accountability program,
school probation, which focused on second - quartile students rather
than the
lowest - performing students in a
school.
Not enough
districts offer mentoring or formal induction programs, and most
districts throw teachers into the fire on the first day of
school and expect them to sink or swim, rather
than giving them
lower - stakes practice time first.
Despite serving a substantially greater proportion of students from
low - income families and minorities
than district schools, a higher percentage of CMU
schools (86 percent) made AYP in 2010 - 11
than did public
schools statewide (79 percent).
A new Fordham report finds that 28 % of teachers in traditional
district schools miss more
than 10
school days a year for sick or personal leave while teachers in charter
schools have
lower rates absences.
Rather
than take on the difficult and challenging work of winning loyalty and enrollment from
low - income parents,
school districts face much more powerful incentives to fight legislative, legal, and public - relations wars.
In the real world, that means
districts have to either practice stricter discipline
than educators deem necessary in their
low - poverty
schools, and / or more lax discipline
than educators deem necessary in their high poverty
schools.
Despite making far larger test - score gains
than students attending open - enrollment
district schools, and despite the emphasis their
schools place on cultivating non-cognitive skills, charter
school students exhibit markedly
lower average levels of self - control as measured by student self - reports (see Figure 2).
(The program substantially enhances high
school graduation rates and increases parental satisfaction at
lower cost per student
than education in the regular public
schools of the
District of Columbia [iv]-RRB-;
We find higher levels of satisfaction among parents of children attending charter
schools than among those attending
district schools, but
lower levels of satisfaction
than among those whose children attend private
schools.
Urban
school districts spend significantly less per pupil on their high - poverty
schools than their
low - poverty ones, a fact that is routinely masked by
school budgets that use average - salary figures rather
than actual ones, a new paper suggests.
As in most other
school districts, the teachers in higher - poverty
schools in our sample have fewer years of experience
than their counterparts in
lower - poverty
schools (11.8 years vs. 14.0 years).
One superintendent of a large, urban
school district said that
low - income high -
school students in his
district were beginning to take MOOCs in greater numbers
than students from more privileged backgrounds.
A Brookings Institution study released in September 2002 concluded that student performance in charter
schools was significantly
lower than that of
district schools on state tests in reading and math.
A study of 49 states by The Education Trust found that
school districts with high numbers of
low - income and minority students receive substantially less state and local money per pupil
than school districts with few poor and minority children.
First, to achieve a targeted budget reduction,
school districts need to lay off a greater number of junior teachers
than senior teachers (as junior teachers have
lower salaries), meaning that a seniority - based layoff policy will cause class sizes to rise more
than they would under an alternate arrangement.
Conversely, late entrants at
district schools had dramatically
lower average 4th - grade test scores
than on - time enrollees: 0.30 and 0.32 standard deviations
lower in reading and math, respectively (in both cases, 0.29 standard deviations below the
district average).
The CREDO analysis also shows that Michigan's
low - income students, who comprise the vast majority of charter students in Detroit, make modest achievement gains (less
than a month of additional learning in math each year) compared to
district schools, as do black and Hispanic students.
Within KIPP
schools, students in early grades have
lower entering achievement levels, on average,
than those in later grades, a pattern that is not evident at
district schools.
Located in an extremely
low - income
district, the
school building houses more
than 1,300 students in grades 5 through 8.
Admissions preference may be given to children in
low - performing
schools, or to children who will increase diversity in their new
school, or, in less - populated states, to those who live closer to an out - of -
district school than to one that is in the
district.
They are just much better
than Detroit's
district schools, which as Robin Lake has noted, is a very
low bar.
I find more credible the statistics from the U.S. Department of Education - sponsored report The State of Charter
Schools 2000 showing that charter schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of district s
Schools 2000 showing that charter
schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of district s
schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent
lower than that of
district schoolsschools.
Approximately 95 percent of CSGF's member
schools enable students to outperform comparable
district schools in both math and reading; nearly 70 percent of
schools enable their students to outperform state averages in both math and reading, although they serve much higher
than average percentages of
low - income and minority students.
Controlling for other factors, houses in
districts with higher - performing government
schools are more expensive
than those in areas with
lower - performing
schools.
Houston is unique in that it provides much more targeted assistance to
low - performing
schools than other
districts.
Promising money to states if they come up with sensible ideas seems to work more effectively
than punishing
schools and
districts for
low performance.
Indeed, it would be remarkable if, all other things being equal,
low - income students did not perform better in high - poverty charter
schools than in high - poverty
district schools given the self - selected nature of the classmates and parental community in charter
schools.
If the new information surprises respondents by indicating the
district is doing less well
than previously thought, the public, upon learning the truth of the matter, is likely to 1)
lower its evaluation of local
schools; 2) become more supportive of educational alternatives for families; 3) alter thinking about current policies affecting teacher compensation and retention; and 4) reassess its thinking about
school and student accountability policies.
Budgets for the current
school year were
lower than last year's in 44 percent of the
districts, while they were held to less
than 4...
We could spend an entire EdNext volume arguing over the CREDO results alone, but I think some things are clear: one, nationally,
low - income kids gain faster in charters
than in
district schools; two, many of CREDO's state and city - specific studies show very strong comparative gains for
low - income charter students; and three, the movement as a whole has made significant progress by doing exactly what the model calls for and closing
low - performing
schools.
A new Achievement
School District (ASD), modeled after those in Louisiana and Tennessee, is charged with transforming these very low - performing schools by taking in a small number (no more than six per year) and pairing them with successful charter networks, with the hope that they will return to district supervision once they're
District (ASD), modeled after those in Louisiana and Tennessee, is charged with transforming these very
low - performing
schools by taking in a small number (no more
than six per year) and pairing them with successful charter networks, with the hope that they will return to
district supervision once they're
district supervision once they're humming.
It is true, as Smith points out, that a 2013 Stanford CREDO study finds that
low - income students in high - poverty charter
schools do somewhat better
than low - income students in high - poverty
district schools.
WNYC public radio recently conducted a comprehensive analysis of student attrition at New York City charter
schools and found that attrition rates are generally
lower at charters
than at nearby
district schools.
Across the country, charter public
schools are serving a higher percentage of students from
low - income backgrounds
than district - run public.
Researchers found that while charters across the country enroll higher percentages of
low - income, black, and Latino students
than traditional
district schools, they enroll
lower percentages of students with disabilities.
When asked about the
schools in their own
district, however, African Americans and Hispanics give notably
lower marks
than whites.
The
district has a 97 percent attendance rate, and fewer
than 1 percent of high
school students drop out, a much
lower rate
than in surrounding
districts with similar demographics.
Dr. Weast led Montgomery County Public
Schools — 16th largest
school district in the nation — to achieve both the highest graduation rate among the nation's largest
school districts for four consecutive years and the highest academic performance ever in MCPS at a time when the non-English-speaking student population more
than doubled and enrollment tipped toward
low socioeconomic demographics.