I deny that
the luminiferous ether is necessary for the transmission of electromagnetic radiation.
Like Phlogiston,
the Luminiferous Ether, the Earth being 20 million years Old (Kelvin), the miasma theory of cholera..........
I believe Sir Isaac Newton was a devoted alchemist and believed in the transmutation of metals and
the luminiferous ether.
I have pointed out that I believe in the GHE with equal fervour to my belief in the existence of
the luminiferous ether or the caloric theory of heat.
All the attempts to argue from authority are about as silly as Lord Kelvin espousing the caloric theory of heat, Newton's belief in alchemy, or even the widespread belief in
the luminiferous ether.
In the late 19th century, all the talk was of
the luminiferous ether, a medium which was thought to carry light.
We do not stream through
the luminiferous ether, but it does wobble a bit.
In the 1880s, Albert Michelson tried to measure the «
luminiferous ether» that scientists thought was the carrier of light.
In Maxwell's time, most physicists thought that light, like sound, needed some kind of medium for transmission; the mysterious, invisible substance they hypothesized, called
the luminiferous ether, would presumably be influenced by the motion of Earth around the sun and the movement of the solar system through the galaxy, a dynamic that stood to alter the speed of light depending on the relative direction from which that light came.
Not exact matches
Maybe it's on the shelf between
Ether (
luminiferous), and Phlogiston.
It now sits on my shelf between «
Ether,
Luminiferous» and «Phlogiston».