Not exact matches
In the weeks since, NASA officials have started sketching out how that effort might unfold —
from a series of small commercial
landers, to larger NASA
landers, to a multinational space station near the Moon that could serve as a base for robots and astronauts travelling to the
lunar surface.
Their results, published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, imply that events
from Solar System history that are recorded on much of the visible face of the Moon can one day be dated directly by instruments aboard a
lunar lander.
In mid-January, NASA announced its
lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown (CATALYST) programme, which will give participants access to resources including NASA scientists, software and testing labs in exchange for the rights to
lander designs born
from the partnership.
To do this, the programme includes a design for the Orion crew capsule with up to six seats, the Altair
lunar lander, and a new booster system called Ares, which uses components
from both the Apollo - era Saturn rocket and the space shuttle.
A group of American space scientists
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) saw and photographed the
lunar lander and a return module during a visit to the Moscow Aviation Institute last November.
It's also part of every science challenge,
from building a
lunar lander out of notecards to inventing new software.
I was merely trying to figure how area such solar panel array would take up and this had nothing to do with costs but checking to see if it took up more area or somewhere close to areas of «peaks of eternal light»: «NASA and Europe revealed a small number of illuminated ridges within 15 km
from the pole, each of them much like an island of no more than a few hundred meters across in an ocean of eternal darkness, where a
lander could receive near - permanent lighting (~ 70 — 90 % of time in
lunar winter, likely 100 % in
lunar summer).»