Sentences with phrase «lunch eligibility»

Poor is defined by free / reduced price lunch eligibility.
A similar but weaker relationship exists along class lines (as measured by free lunch eligibility).
«Reduced price lunch eligibility» corresponds to family income between 130 % and 185 % of the federal poverty line.
«Free lunch eligibility» means that family income is below 130 % of the federal poverty line for a family of that size.
Meanwhile, in Caroline, Frederick, or Talbot County Schools, the median Title I school had about the same free - or reduced - price lunch eligibility rate as the median non-Title I school in Baltimore City.
But just to make the point even more clear, the NEAP scores over the last 10 years by National School Lunch Eligibility for the three states quoted by CCER, (NJ, MA, and CT) bear out Dianne's points that poverty does matter and it's not «an excuse.»
Because poverty predicts risk for school adjustment problems, low achievement, crime, and other problem behaviors, the effects of the full intervention on children from poor families were investigated using logistic and linear regression methods as appropriate, with terms for intervention and free lunch eligibility as main effects and an interaction term for intervention by participation in the free lunch program.
School lunch eligibility status (free, reduced price, and full price) also served as a proxy for socioeconomic status.
The distribution of school - level free and reduced - price lunch eligibility rates in Title I and non-Title I elementary schools, by district (Maryland)
Proposals to serve students who attend schools with free and reduced - price lunch eligibility of 75 percent or greater.
In 2011, Indiana passed a school choice bill which currently allows 9,300 kids from low and middle income families with household income below 150 percent of school lunch eligibility to receive vouchers equal to between 50 and 90 percent of state per - pupil education funding to use at any of 289 schools — some of which provide religious education — that participate in the Choice Scholarship Program.
• Map performance on all of these measures against free and reduced - price lunch eligibility rates to determine which schools are truly excelling at educating low - income students and which schools are simply coasting along with an advantaged student body.
Under these rules, districts rank their schools by need (they are required to use a percentage rather than count of economic disadvantage, and often use free - and reduced - price - lunch eligibility rates for this purpose) and then have discretion about how they wish to concentrate funds — that is, they choose how far down the list to go, subject to the requirement that they can not «skip» a poorer school and then serve a wealthier school serving the same grade span.
Specifically, I control for the student's race, limited English status, free or reduced - price lunch eligibility, years of parents» education, and whether the student is academically gifted or has a learning disability.
Alternatively, although we control for free or reduced - price lunch eligibility, it may be the case that low - income families have a stronger preference for charter schools.
Specifically, we calculate growth for schools based on math scores while taking into account students» prior performance in both math and communication arts; characteristics that include race, gender, free or reduced - price lunch eligibility (FRL), English - language - learner status, special education status, mobility status, and grade level; and school - wide averages of these student characteristics.
The finding holds, even when one adjusts for changes in the ethnic composition, free - lunch eligibility, class size, and education expenditures for each state (see Figure 3).
Each state's score can be adjusted for any combination of up to six student demographic factors: age, race / ethnicity, frequency of English spoken at home, special education status, free or reduced - price lunch eligibility, and English language learner status.
The district now reserves a share of seats at each school for low - income students, as measured by a student's free or reduced - price lunch eligibility.99
I highlighted the A districts and J districts so one can see the gap that exists not only in SAT achievement, but percentage of Free lunch eligibility.
«Background characteristics (e.g., race, gender, neighborhood poverty, free lunch eligibility, being old - for - grade, and special education status) are all related to high school grades and test scores, but they do not tell us any more about who will pass, get good grades, or score well on tests in high school, once we take into account students» eighth - grade GPAs, attendance, and test scores,» the authors said.
After learning more about the school and looking in - depth at disaggregated student outcomes disaggregated by race and free and reduced lunch eligibility (including test scores and attendance and retention rates) for the last few years, you decide to write a memo that you will submit to the leadership team to enhance the expertise of the faculty to teach and engage diverse students effectively.
In the early 1990s, the average Latino and black student attended a school where roughly a third of students were low income (as measured by free and reduced price lunch eligibility), but now attend schools where low income students account for nearly two - thirds of their classmates.
Specifically, we want to know the racial / ethnic composition of the schools, the proportion of ELL, SPED and low - income students (by free and reduced lunch eligibility).
The trajectories were identical for nearly all subgroups of children as defined by their gender, race / ethnicity, and economic resources (as delineated by school lunch eligibility).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z