Pleural mesothelioma is referred to as asbestos
lung cancer because it affects the lung area.
In fact, more people develop skin cancer because of tanning than develop
lung cancer because of smoking.
Aaron P. Mitchell, M.D., of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, and coauthors examined FCOIs during 2014 among 125 authors of the guidelines for the treatment of breast, colon, prostate and
lung cancer because those are the cancers with the highest incidence in the U.S.
Not exact matches
However,
because the way
cancer develops in the body is extremely complex, one's
cancer risk isn't just about what we put in our mouths, cars, and
lungs.
Analysts at the investment bank said the Dow member's sales could boom
because of Keytruda, a blockbuster drug used to treat
lung cancer.
That's not just
because of Opdivo's failure — last month, Keytruda was shown to be better than standard chemotherapy in untreated advanced
lung cancer patients with high levels of the PD - L1 protein, both stopping
cancer progression and extending patients» lives.
A mechanic doesn't complain about fixing your car
because you didn't take care of it, a heart surgeon doesn't complain about your heart attack
because you ate too many cheese burgers and a doctor treating
lung cancer doesn't complain about all the cigarettes you smoked to get yourself some
cancer.
People are developing
lung cancer today
because they were exposed to asbestos particles in and around shipyards during World War II.26 Technology creates environmental dangers, and knowing about these dangers confronts us with problems; we must make choices that did not exist before.
Because of
lung cancer's reputation as a self - induced illness and its low survival rate, it rarely attracts big research money.
Logically, that is the exact same argument as saying
because some non-smokers in my family got
lung cancer, and
because I have a great great aunt that lived to 100 without getting
lung cancer while smoking two packs a day, I don't really have to worry about
lung cancer if I start smoking, using smoking as an indicator of
cancer risk is garbage.
One of the main reasons to quit smoking is
because of the health risks; there are numerous conditions associated with cigarettes, including heart disease and an increased risk of heart attack, many types of
cancer including
lung and oral
cancer, and an increased risk of stroke.
I Kesem for every member of our incredible CKUF family, and
because I was personally affected by
cancer at 14 when my dad was diagnosed with
lung cancer.
He had stepped down as Northern Ireland secretary in January
because of ill health after being diagnosed with the early stages of
lung cancer.
Because it looks for a process, not a part, nuclear medicine is particularly good at showing whether or not
cancer has metastasized to a distant site, such as from the
lungs to the brain.
Because the metastatic and primary samples weren't from the same individuals, and because the samples were drawn from a hodgepodge of cancers (lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, uterus, and ovary), Golub didn't really expect to see anything inter
Because the metastatic and primary samples weren't from the same individuals, and
because the samples were drawn from a hodgepodge of cancers (lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, uterus, and ovary), Golub didn't really expect to see anything inter
because the samples were drawn from a hodgepodge of
cancers (
lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, uterus, and ovary), Golub didn't really expect to see anything interesting.
«This research effort is important
because it will assist in recommending effective, optimal treatments tailored specifically to older patients with
lung cancer,» he said.
Because esophageal
cancers can spread to the liver,
lungs, bones and brain, the prognosis for patients diagnosed at late stages is poor.
We used death from
lung cancer as a marker for smoking - related death
because lung cancer is the condition most strongly tied to smoking.
Because it is so deadly and because the number of new cases is increasing, it is predicted to be the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the western world by 2020, trailing only lung cancer, h
Because it is so deadly and
because the number of new cases is increasing, it is predicted to be the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the western world by 2020, trailing only lung cancer, h
because the number of new cases is increasing, it is predicted to be the second leading cause of
cancer deaths in the western world by 2020, trailing only
lung cancer, he adds.
This law is so weak, critics say, that an EPA effort to ban asbestos — a class of fibrous minerals known to cause the deadly
lung cancer mesothelioma — got struck down by a federal court in 1991
because the agency had failed to comply with another TSCA mandate that the agency pick the «least burdensome» way of regulating a substance.
Clubbing, or swelling of the fingertips, is one of the first symptoms medical students are taught to look for
because it can signal
lung cancer, heart disease, or other grave conditions.
A «rule book,» however, may be more difficult to write for other
cancers, such as
lung cancer, Swanton says,
because they have more randomness associated with their evolution.
They suggested that the melanoma and
lung cancer patients had done best
because those
cancers have lots of mutations, a consequence of exposure to sunlight and cigarette smoke.
Although we are focused on development in
lung cancer at present, AST - VAC2 has potential for broad applications in oncology
because telomerase is expressed in more than 95 % of
cancers.
«Those pollutants cause people to die early,
because of heart attack, stroke,
lung cancer, [and] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,» West said.
Participants are being asked to take part in this study
because they have advanced or metastatic non-small cell
lung cancer that has recurred or progressed after previous chemotherapy (s) including a platinum - based treatment.
There is no typical story
because when a person is diagnosed with
lung cancer today, I don't know what I'm going to be treating them with in five years.
That's
because, compared with»
lung and other hard - to - treat
cancers (such as ovarian), breast
cancer tends to be caught at earlier, more treatable stages, thanks to screenings like mammograms (which is why it's so important to get one every year, starting at age 40).
Just
because a study doesn't find a link between marijuana and
lung cancer doesn't mean it's safe, while studies that do find a link may be unreliable too, due to extenuating factors.
Because the link to
lung cancer is well known, asbestos is used much less often today than it was in years past.
In fact, in 2013 the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) declared outdoor air a potential carcinogen because of the link to lung and bladder c
Cancer (IARC) declared outdoor air a potential carcinogen
because of the link to
lung and bladder
cancercancer.
(Anyone who was sedentary
because of a history of
cancer, diabetes, heart disease, or
lung disease was not included in the study.)
When I wrote my book «Fight Fat With Fat» and we had done some research, butter had come to the forefront
because we found that butyric acid, which is the component of butter, can actually turn off oncogenes,
cancer genes, particularly
cancers regarding colon, certain
lung, and prostate.
However,
because we know that 70 - 87 % of
lung cancers are linked to smoking, no health expert would ever say that smoking, even just one cigarette a day, is a good idea.
For example, just
because a person doesn't smoke, they could still get
lung cancer.
«He's been sick,» I said,
because this had been going on for a year, and though nobody gets better from metastatic small - cell
lung cancer, he'd been holding his own for months and months.
Yes, good news,
because the alternative diagnosis was
lung cancer.
Merrick trusted me after I worked my way thru
Lung Cancer and my Credit took a beating
because of my huge Doctor Bills.
My credit report has things on their that
because I was a spouse are now also mine... however on the last four years
because he had
lung cancer and I had not got my disability started the vehicle s he used to could drive we turn back in
because his meducal care being he only had medicare was outrageous and after my ltd with the company lapsed so did my med ins.
The same study revealed higher
lung cancer rates in short to medium length nosed dogs who live with smokers (like boxers and bulldogs)
because their shorter nasal passages allow the carcinogenic particles to reach the
lungs more easily.
and sure it lowers the risk of
cancer but only
because you cant get
cancer in what you do nt have so tell me... would you cut off your daughters boobs off and say «well it lowers her risk of
cancer» or would you remove one of your mothers
lungs (without her permission) just
because its one less thing to get
cancer in?
Radiography (X-Rays) are a very important test prior to surgery
because up to 50 % of the dogs with malignant breast
cancer have spread of the disease to the
lungs at the time of their exam.
Studies have also shown that dogs with short and medium - noses are more susceptible to
lung cancer, «
because their shorter nasal passage aren't as effective at accumulating the inhaled secondhand smoke carcinogens,» MacAllister said.
Because, I'm sure, just like Richard Lindzen, probably the most scientifically credible skeptic out there (tenured at MIT and all), you believe that the evidence that cigarette smoking can lead to
lung cancer and heart disease is just a «plot» to extend government power.
Death by
lung cancer so often does have linkage to smoking but it is conceptual twaddle to say that a broken nose from another's fist is in some way different
because it doesn't have linkages to some prior behaviour / events.
The leftover plutonium must be isolated for 240,000 years before it is safe,
because breathing air contaminated with it sooner can cause fatal
lung cancers.
So
because a journalist from Newsweek wrote in 2001 «Heâ $ ™ ll even expound on how weakly
lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking.»
However, the reanalysis of inconvenient results by obtaining the raw data is a known tool in the arsenal of vested interests: Michaels (2008) shows how epidemiological data have been subjected to industry - sponsored re-analysis
because of their regulatory implications, such as the link between tobacco and
lung cancer or the link between bladder
cancer and chemicals used in dye production.
Moreover, the paper gets its history wrong when it notes that «Total
cancer mortality rates did not decline until 1990, 25 years after the identification of the effect of smoking on
lung and other
cancers...» Well, actually, it was more like 50 years,
because the earliest studies to connect smoking and
lung cancer were conducted not by NIH - funded scientists but by Nazi scientists in the run - up to World War II.4 By the logic of the PNAS paper, then, ought we to be crediting the Nazi health science agenda with whatever progress has been made on reducing
lung cancer, rather than the incredibly protracted and difficult public health campaign (that, for the most part, NIH had nothing to do with) aimed at getting people to cut down on smoking?
One report says «The International Association of Firefighters supports bans on these chemicals
because firefighters have been shown to be at much higher risk of
cancer, heart,
lung and other debilitating diseases caused by the dangerous gases created when fire retardants burn.