Sentences with phrase «made about causation»

If negligence can be established, comments need to be made about causation using the same «but for» test towards the consequences of substandard care.

Not exact matches

I agree with momoya, that it is of little use to make suppositions about such mechanisms or sequences of causation without evidence.

He admitted that correlation is not causation but pointed out that if the mainstream media could make such a fuss about crap research showing an association between induction and autism, his work should be able to get even more attention.

Observational studies of this type have several limitations, the main one being that it is difficult to establish causation — for example, was it the electronic cigarettes that caused people to stop smoking or was it something else about the e-cigarette users that made them more likely to quit?

It's easy to make faulty inferences about the direction of causation.

Well the only thing that makes me suspicious about drawing conclusions from all of these nations where the people have a vegan or primarily vegan diet, is that I have done some research that claims the height can arise from genetics, as well as if a person is receiving enough food (now whether or not these studies went off of correlation and did not test actual causation, I do not know).

States differ in ways that make drawing conclusions about causation quite troublesome.

Iv» e been reading Bsall postings and they all have a lot of passion for educating children which is what education is supposed to be about... My personal 2cents worth is this - In social science there is very little that can meet the level of scientifically verifiable causation and we therefor shouldn't be making decisions that impact childrens lives based on faulty science.

Yet some of the most frequently repeated claims made by those engaged in the climate change disinformation campaign have been outright untruths about such things as the claim that the entire scientific basis for human induced climate change is a hoax or that there is no evidence of human causation.

More specifically in regard to the question of human causation, opponents of climate change policies that deny human causation should be expected to specifically respond to the numerous «foot - print» and «attribution» studies that the international community has relied on to make conclusions about human causation.

E.g. of those abstracts making a statement about the quantitative contribution of human activity to the warming, 87 % (65/75) endorsed dominant human causation.

You want someone to say, «Correlation is not causation,» or some variant thereof, and then you want someone to make a point about sauce for the goose or attribution or whatnot for the rising temperature periods that do correlate, blah - blah - blah.

«The way around this problem is to amend Rule 702 to allow courts to admit educated guesses about causation, but only when nonpartisan experts, not subject to adversarial bias, are willing to make such guesses.»

There's nothing about how causation plays out in contribution claims that, in principle, makes material contribution to risk inconsistent.

I did not mention autism, nor did I make any pronouncements about «causation.»

In order to make informed, intelligent, fair and reasonable decisions about causation and liability it is often necessary to rely on the scientific expertise of a qualified accident reconstruction expert.

You should not make any formal statements about fault, causation, or your opinion on what happened.

[77] Nonetheless, to make a finding of causation based on a robust and pragmatic approach, in my view, it was incumbent on the trial judge to consider and make findings about the evidence relevant to the medical issues.

These DVDs will show you how to make informed decisions about: claims, causation development of treatment plans, best practices, management, health promotion, rehabilitation, disability impairment, and return to work.

An argument has been made — for example, in Lynda M. Collins «Causation, contribution and Clements: Revisiting the material contribution test in Canadian tort law» (2011), 19 Tort L. Rev. 86 — that there is something inherently uncertain about vehicle dynamics because (in the scheme of human scientific progress) this subject is relatively new.

First, its study design is cross-sectional and correlational, so inferences about causation can not be made.