Sentences with phrase «made about climate science»
You don't need your own pocket - sized IPCC to evaluate claims made about climate science... We found two pertinent quotes on this very site.
http://www.climate-resistance.org/ Not exact matches
A new government report on the science of climate change has made it past the Trump White House unscathed with forceful statements about humanity's role in rising temperatures and their severe threat to the United States.
Whitehouse has made the revelations about Exxon's climate science research the subject of several of his recent weekly speeches.
I confess that I have become somewhat blasé about the range of exciting — I think revolutionary is probably more accurate — technologies that we are rolling out today: our work in genomics and its translation into varieties that are reaching poor farmers today; our innovative integration of long — term and multilocation trials with crop models and modern IT and communications technology to reach farmers in ways we never even imagined five years ago; our vision to create a C4 rice and see to it that Golden Rice reaches poor and hungry children; maintaining productivity gains in the face of dynamic pests and pathogens; understanding the nature of the rice grain and what makes for good quality; our many efforts to change the way rice is grown to meet the challenges of changing rural economies, changing societies, and a changing climate; and, our extraordinary array of partnerships that has placed us at the forefront of the CGIAR change process through the Global Rice Science Partnership.
Complex Science Made Accessible: the Fog Lifts from Climate Change - Environmental Critique - July 30, 2016 There is nothing simple about Climate Change.
«The chairman of the committee on Science Space and Technology is making what to us is a pretty ludicrous assertion, that rather than trying to protect the rights of citizens to ensure that business fraud, and could be very significant business fraud we could talk about inflating up assets by many billions of dollars, their claim is that this is a politically charged effort to silence descending views on climate,» Schneiderman said on a recent visit to Syracuse.
Catherine Matacic — online news editor for Science — talks with Sarah Crespi about how geoengineering could reduce the harshest impacts of climate change, but make them even worse if it were ever turned off.
An apocalyptic message about climate change might motivate some people to act but make others feel hopeless, science communication experts say.
Jonathan Renouf, executive producer at BBC Science, said: «We set out to make a film with three objectives; to say something new about climate change, to stay true to the science, and to attract an audience to what is unquestionably a demanding sScience, said: «We set out to make a film with three objectives; to say something new about climate change, to stay true to the science, and to attract an audience to what is unquestionably a demanding sscience, and to attract an audience to what is unquestionably a demanding subject.
Credit growing concerns about climate and computer advances that make it easier to fashion custom - shaped panels, says Sam Zelinka, head of building and fire sciences research at the Forest Products Laboratory, an arm of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, in Madison.
Schultz, a professor of synoptic meteorology, and co-author Dr Vladimir Janković, a science historian specialising in weather and climate, say the short - term, large variability from year to year in high - impact weather makes it difficult, if not impossible, to draw conclusions about the correlation to longer - term climate change.
A magnitude - 9 earthquake in Japan, a momentous climate change summit, reports on future global «hyperwarming», and rumblings about some of the first geoengineering field trials all made 2011 a remarkable year for the environmental sciences.
The Review is a super refined weekly web publication curated by subject matter experts from Yale who summarize important research articles from leading natural and social science journals with the hope that people can make more informed decisions using latest research results.The Review launched this week and covers a wide range of topics, like this brief about climate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversitclimate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversitClimate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversitclimate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversity loss.
He also asked about comments she made that likened acceptance of climate change science to a «kind of paganism» and suggested that top United Nations climate policy advocates were effectively supporting communism.
The reason that Keystone got so much attention is not because that particular pipeline is a make - or - break issue for climate change, but because those who have looked at the science of climate change are scared and concerned about a general lack of sufficient movement to deal with the problem.
Diffenbaugh said the congressman and the scientists had «a very pleasant and positive discussion about the level of scientific understanding that we have about the climate system, the institutions of science by which we conduct our day - to - day work and the peer - review process, and how public decisions are made within the context of scientific understanding.
in the other case, another friend made disparaging remarks about my cfl's and when i later said, very casually, something to the effect that he doubted the science, he referred to something dixie lee ray said at least fifty years ago about ice ages and climate variations.
What is it about studying climate science that gives one a priviledged position in judging whether tree rings make appropriate climate proxies?
What is it about studying climate science that gives one unique insite into whether ice cores make accurate temperature proxies?
In an op - ed for Fox News, Rep. Lamar Smith, the chairman of the House science committee, made a host of false and misleading claims about climate change and related issues.
Scientists have made the science section of the National Climate Assessment public before it is officially due to be released, citing concerns that the administration may attempt to change some of the facts it presents about climate Climate Assessment public before it is officially due to be released, citing concerns that the administration may attempt to change some of the facts it presents about climate climate change.
(d) He said the fourth system change concerns the way we organize ourselves as humans, urging us to make sure our organizational principles align with what we know about the planet (he admitted he fully accepts the climate change science).
Making observations about the weather and discussing climate are great ways to teach children about science, especially since weather is something children can easily relate to and understand.
To prime the pump, I mentioned a couple of instances that I reported on Dot Earth, including a report estimating 300,000 deaths a year from global warming and contentious statements made about the predicted die - back of the Amazon rain forest at a climate - science summit in Copenhagen early last year.
I seriously doubt that you know anything more about climate science than I, or understand scientific principles on anything more than an 8th grade level, but you think you can make up for it in sheer bluster and bluff.
You lie repeatedly about the science and make no effort to learn about statistics or climate science.
I was depicted as «less than honest about», «simply making unfounded assertions», «had any credibility in criticizing climate science».
It is the decoupling of dispassionate from skepticism that makes public discussions about climate science and environmental issues in general so uninformative.
The claims about climate change science made by these conservative / industry groups have questionable scientific value.
However one may feel, think, or know about AGW, taking a stated group (s) to task is not to take everyone such would be included by any reasonable definition of «mainstream science», unless this is code for IPCC and climate scientists who make up only a small part of what is considered «mainstream science».
If you are going to make claims about the role of CO2 in the warming of the earth climate system, I suggest you first make an effort to understand what the science actually tells us.
While I accept the definition of a climate scientist being used on this site is someone who has published on the subject, I certainly do not accept that those who haven't are not able to make a judgement about the state of the science.
This is why I demand anyone who makes big claims about climate science, whether sceptical or catastrophic, show me the evidence.
Off and on for years, I have been trying to make a large, public bet about the next few decades with someone who disagrees strenuously with mainstream climate science.
It's unusual for a senior government expert — Dr. Pope is responsible for informing British government offices about climate science — to make such points.
In fact, the difference would be that Perry is even more vocally opposed to climate science than Bush was — at least Bush didn't have the gall to make ridiculous statements about climate scientists perpetrating a hoax on the American people.
Too many people think of climate science as an exact science like astronomy that can make highly confident predictions, such as about lunar eclipses.
My sense about the climate emails that have been stolen and the information they have provided is that they have released a barrage of additional information which makes clear the robustness of the science, the multitude, the enormous multitude of different strands of evidence that support the urgency and the severity of the problem, that have been managed in multiple places around the world.
More than 650 scientists from around the world dispute the claims made by the United Nations and former Vice President Al Gore about global warming, saying that science does not support that climate change is a manmade phenomenon, according to a posting on the Senate environmental committee's press blog.
Moreover, the arguments I made about «consensus messaging» on climate are all very specific to that controversy; I have zero idea what sorts of arguments someone would make about GM food science communication.
Just as missing data in some areas of climate science does nt prevent us from making rational statements about global warming, so to the fact of missing mails does not prevent us from describing clearly what we do know about the mails.
And I think there is an important, but small, correction to make here — it should be the «violence of the disagreement about climate science» as the vast majority of the violent disagreement comes from the outside.
It appears the hostility about position statements has nothing to do with the associations making them or climate science.
Because Monsanto knows how farmers really feel about climate scientists, it also recently acquired a firm that specializes in synthesizing government and university climate - science data for the purpose of issuing made - to - order forecasts tailored to users» locations.
«you do not know anything about the science or lack of it exhibited by the» Climate Scientists» but just took their word and made a post here about Steve.
What is astonishing about Tol's campaign is that he does not himself deny the physical science of global warming and also admits that the percentage consensus on man - made climate change is in the high nineties.
Not being a climate scientist, and not realizing in the mid-70's that there WAS such a thing, I'm sure you will forgive me for noticing that all the articles in the «popular press», like «Newsweek», «Popular Science», «Popular Mechanics», «Science Digest», newspapers, et al warning us of an imminent ice age and proposing methods of staving off disaster were simply being made up out of whole cloth by science editors to drum up circulation while the real Climate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenclimate scientist, and not realizing in the mid-70's that there WAS such a thing, I'm sure you will forgive me for noticing that all the articles in the «popular press», like «Newsweek», «Popular Science», «Popular Mechanics», «Science Digest», newspapers, et al warning us of an imminent ice age and proposing methods of staving off disaster were simply being made up out of whole cloth by science editors to drum up circulation while the real Climate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenScience», «Popular Mechanics», «Science Digest», newspapers, et al warning us of an imminent ice age and proposing methods of staving off disaster were simply being made up out of whole cloth by science editors to drum up circulation while the real Climate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenScience Digest», newspapers, et al warning us of an imminent ice age and proposing methods of staving off disaster were simply being made up out of whole cloth by science editors to drum up circulation while the real Climate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenscience editors to drum up circulation while the real Climate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenClimate Scientists were frantically trying to warn us that we were about to be rendered into cracklings by anthropogenic CO2.
On top of that, Cook's fake comments misrepresented Motl's views about climate science - in other words, Cook just made up lies stuff.
If Webster and Abramowitz are right, that may have been enough to make large numbers of religious conservatives recoil from the science on climate change and reject any messages about the need to reverse it.
Some of these big Universities also have» Climate Change» departments and during lunch breaks at staff canteens, I have made it a point wherever possible to go engage them in discussions about climate sClimate Change» departments and during lunch breaks at staff canteens, I have made it a point wherever possible to go engage them in discussions about climate sclimate science.