Sentences with phrase «made about his doctrine»

In what follows I will show that the first assumption is clearly wrong and that the second assumption glosses over certain important distinctions Whitehead made about his doctrine of ingression.

Not exact matches

The funny thing about baptisms for the dead is that Mormon doctrine itself makes the practice meaningless!

At this level you not only are able to critique the texts and doctrines and their relationship to one another, but you are able to make judgments about the whole thought system and belief system altogether.

I would never expect a nonmember of this church to understand enough about its doctrine to make an honest assessment of anything other than superficial, publicized topics.

Considering that it took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about theology, to start picking scripture to match that doctrine, and that the oldest known copt of the bible has over 27,000 «corrections» written all over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full of false doctrine to begin with?

It is your task to teach newcomers about Christian doctrine and Christian behavior and that sort of thing; it is our task to make sure that newcomers know about local traditions.

«I guess I may be too insistent that a Christian has to make central some traditional doctrine about Jesus.

The main problem with the Way of Fundamentalism is that if you decide carte blanche that there are doctrines of faith that can not be scrutinized by reason, you risk making huge mistakes about your faith.

Hence, Whitehead notes: «I am not making any judgment about the details of their theology, for example, about the Trinitarian doctrine» (AI 169).

Am not anti-Christ nor Anti-Jewish just like all Muslims am a monotheist so must be rather Anti-Polytheists & Disbelievers... but believe me it is not hatred but rather pityness for the innocents and hardness towards the wicked transgressors... Guess that is all about it unless few of our brother got the message wrong!?! Since we learned from the Quran verses that there will be in paradise from the Jews, Christian and others from other beliefs... and since God forgives any thing else other than to assign for him partners as polytheists do, then that means many of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise of fears from dominant doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...!?

While there is room for talking about such a step, one should not ignore the specific contribution made by traditional cultures to the whole process of formulating Christian doctrines.

Like a spiritual corpse, he is unable to make a single move toward God, think a right thought about God, or even respond to God — unless God first brings this spiritually dead corpse to life (Boice and Ryken, Doctrines of Grace, 74).

«4 The reason for the idea is the doctrine of the immortality of truth; holding a correspondence view of truth, Hartshorne feels he requires the unfading everlastingness of all occasions in God to make the notion of truths about the past intelligible.

There is no explicit doctrine of the Trinity in the gospels, but these sayings about the Counselor became important material for the formation of that doctrine when, because of certain external pressures in the fourth century, the relation between God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit needed to be made explicit.

One hates to make old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?

It follows that there is a genuine purality of propositions to be made about man, and despite ultimate unity of a systematic doctrine of man (anthropology in that sense), there are in principle several sciences that can and must treat of man.

People are doing this to not stand out, its a way of making one feel imporetant, as with most if not all so called religious leaderrs they know very little or anything at all about the doctrines of the religion their in and this is a Fact.

While many of the catechists and leaders of RCIA were concerned about questions such as multiculturalism and inclusive language, the participants whom RCIA is to serve want a greater emphasis upon doctrine and what makes the Catholic Church distinctive.

I was once fired for reading about and investigating some doctrines that made my boss uncomfortable, though I never disagreed with the doctrinal statement.

While it does not exclude a lengthy period of time over whichGod may bring about distinction within his creation, nor many subordinate means through which he may have executed his designs, the doctrine here manifestly excludes pure chance: «By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, and all their host by the breath of his mouth.

And though they eventually made up, their disagreement has lived on in American evangelicals» waxing and waning debates about God's sovereignty and the doctrines of election and free will.

Often times I am looking for a clearer understanding of a time period in Christian history (generally because a modern author has made some wild and confrontational claim about how a certain doctrine or denomination arose).

However, in inference pattern (2) no explicit claim is made about metaphysical doctrines of any kind.

Heck, I was thinking the same thing about the atheists that have their own self made doctrine of love and tolerance.

I make my living studying and teaching these important doctrines and I have convictions about them.

They make inaccurate claims about some of the most basic principles of Christian doctrine.

In Religion in the Making Whitehead says that Christianity starts with a tremendous notion about the world and that this notion is not derived from a metaphysical doctrine, but rather from our comprehension of the sayings and action of Christ.

(It was a pretty short book) So if he started with the as.sumption that miracles don't exist, then how can he make a definitive statement about the doctrine of the Trinity that is everywhere taught in the Bible?

He wants Christians to move on from milk doctrines and teachings that make us feel warm and fuzzy, to the meat truths of the Word that we mull over, think about, and digest (cf. Heb 5:11 — 6:3).

The reality of past events is partially preserved as newly synthesized elements in later events but fully and infallibly in the never - failing memory of God.51 Hartshorne explains further that a denial of the full reality of the past would entail the conclusion that no true statements could be made about the determinate character of past events («Lincoln was assassinated»), whereas acceptance of his doctrine of the nonactuality of the future entails the falsity of all statements that ascribe completely determinate character to future events.52 «Maybe» is the only correct mode of reference to the future.

Similarly no one religious faith or religious conception of the Ultimate Reality or even any one doctrine about the relation between religions should be made integral to Open Secularism.

But I would strongly caution against making a «law» or doctrine about it.

Doctrine are those human lessons we've learned over time trying to live under Dogma, and are usually about the mistakes made along the way (doctrine only develops by human actions that caused additional suffering that didn't need to happen - doctrine is about teaching you NOT to do those Doctrine are those human lessons we've learned over time trying to live under Dogma, and are usually about the mistakes made along the way (doctrine only develops by human actions that caused additional suffering that didn't need to happen - doctrine is about teaching you NOT to do those doctrine only develops by human actions that caused additional suffering that didn't need to happen - doctrine is about teaching you NOT to do those doctrine is about teaching you NOT to do those things).

His Evolution and the Christian Doctrine of Creation (Westminster Press, 1967) demonstrates the remarkable change that the use of the process conceptuality can make in talk about creation and its mode, and in the scientific corollaries of this world view.

But in many» not all, to be sure» cases of «dividing doctrines,» we now have a level of stated agreement among many whose contemporary (and still contested) achievement makes one wonder about the essential character of doctrinal conflict in the first place.

Running a country should be about making practical decisions based on the facts, not turning the doctrine of your faith in to laws.

However, Professor Brian Benestad, who teaches theology at the University of Scranton, argues «If the Catholic schools are required to recognize the union, then you're going to have government... intervening in the school, making decisions about whether the bishops» invocation of doctrine is really genuine.»

To understand what this site is about, it makes sense for me to first define the words the site is based upon, Fitness Doctrine.

About Blog Living Theologically makes theology practical and understandable for the normal Christian who loves Jesus and the gospel but hasn't formally studied doctrine.

Some good political points were made about social issues and America's meddling in other nations (the shock doctrine comes to mind).

She's not writing so that someday, someone will know about the doctrines of the religion, or why she believed or didn't believe, but so that she herself will never forget that among all the unseen and the intangible that make up an evangelical life, there were things that were real; things that happened, that you could see and smell and touch.

Members of the GCMI would make public statements in the mass media, to show that scientists were not «unified in their opposition, but in fact were arguing about it», and would threaten to sue under a Fairness Doctrine that required balance in the media at the time.

There is a load of alternative scientific viewpoint about which makes a lot more sense than the doctrine pushed by climate scientists.

Canada's anomalous stance on the issue had put the country at odds with pharmaceutical giants such as Eli Lilly, which made a NAFTA complaint about the rejection of patents based on the doctrine in Canada when the same formulations had been recognized in other jurisdictions.

I've talked about the «castle doctrine» here before (aka the «Make My Day Law» or, more negatively, the «Shoot The Milkman Law»).

Since Swartentruber represented himself, this could well mean nothing more than that he failed to make an appropriate assertion about his firmly held beliefs (since one is not required to show that their church has a specific doctrine).

In HL it was held that the detention, under the common law doctrine of necessity, of a man with autism, who lacked the mental capacity to make decisions about his care and living arrangements, amounted to a violation of his rights under Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Now Stratas, suspecting that the SCC is about to revisit the doctrine of judicial review, is making a plea for some kind of coherent approach:

Let's start with doctrine: — Current copyright literature Next to Genie Tyburski and the wonderful Virtual Chase — Virtual Chase Legal Research guide: Intellectual Property Law From Slaw's own Ted Tjaden, some Canadian links — Intellectual Property Law — Canada Pausing only to suppress my occasional cynicism about the length of time that Canada's policy - making on copyright has been going on, at least they have good resources explaining the process — Copyright Reform Process A few comparative links: the United Kingdom — Copyright on the UK Patent Office Site Next New Zealand — New Zealand Copyright Law How to do research on Australian copyright law — Intellectual Property Research in Australia Now two important US sites: first the authorized version — The US Copyright Office Next, a wonderful site that reflects some of Larry Lessig «s thinking at Stanford — The Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center And finally, reflecting the fact that so much law in this area reflects not domestic policy - making, but hard - fought international consensus, an Index to what the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a United Nations agency has accomplished — WIPO Index And to conclude with an American and a European take on international copyright, since I was just in Chicago, look at Irene Berkey's links — International Intellectual Property and finally a European source (actually it's Swiss, but that's not obviousRobert Kraft, in his Diaries, quotes Stravinsky, la justice — c’est une invention suisse)-- Swiss Legal Research Center International IP Links, run by CMS von Erlach Henrici And finally, a nice and quirky piece on the oddities of copyright called — Digital Copyright & Copywrong by Peter Jacso.

The Llewellyn - style contradictions in doctrines governing statutory interpretation, the ambiguity of the «shadow constitutional norms» protected by canons like Kent v. Dulles, and the ambiguity of textual «ambiguity» necessary to trigger canons like Brown & Williamson make principled cross-statutory generalizations about presidential power here (and perhaps elsewhere) almost impossible.