It is in the bottom 10 percent of schools statewide, having
made adequate yearly progress only once since 2003 under the federal No Child Left Behind Act.
Not exact matches
In fact, the «safe harbor» provisions in NCLB mean that all schools do not have to meet fixed targets across the board each year, but
only make some improvement in order to
make adequate yearly progress.
Under the law, schools must show not
only that their overall student body is
making «
adequate yearly progress» on state tests, but also that a sufficient percentage of certain subgroups of students are likewise proficient.
Then the district offered transfers
only to students in 48 of the 179 schools that had failed to
make adequate yearly progress.
In California, Maryland, and Ohio,
only 14, 12, and 9 percent of schools in restructuring, respectively,
made adequate yearly progress (AYP) as defined by NCLB the following year.
One of the key reasons for a possible disconnect is the law's requirement that not
only the entire school but also racial, ethnic, economic, and other subgroups within the school
make adequate yearly progress.
At that time, and under his leadership, the school was the
only middle school in the district to have earned an A grade and
make Adequate Yearly Progress every year since the inception of No Child Left Behind.
2001 brought passage of the No Child Left Behind Act, a momentous reauthorization of the ESEA, declaring not
only that every single student should become «proficient» in math and reading, but also that every school in the land would have its performance reported, both school wide and for its student demographic subgroups, and that schools failing to
make «
adequate yearly progress» would face a cascade of sanctions and interventions.
When Hall came to Anderson, the school was one of
only two schools in Nevada to have failed to
make adequate yearly progress (AYP) for three consecutive years.
However, this year
only 23 % of Florida Schools — 785 out of 3,324
made Adequate Yearly Progress under the No Child Left Behind Act.
Anderson was one of
only two schools in the state to fail to
make adequate yearly progress for three consecutive years.
Not
only did teachers notice a positive change in student behavior, but compared with schools that were not
making adequate yearly academic
progress under NCLB, schools that were meeting their annual academic targets also had a greater commitment to SEL.21
For example,
only one quarter of schools managed by large cyber-school provider K - 12 Inc. are
making «
Adequate Yearly Progress» under federal standards.