As Steven Weinberg points out here, the argument
made against extremists ends up invoking a moral sense to argue that the religious ideas of the extremists are wrong, when the whole point of religion is that it should be the other way around.
Not exact matches
So those who are posting and saying they belong to Christian organizations and volunteer to help others REALLY are better people than all the smugly «reasonable» posters whose venomous diatribes
against having any religious belief
make them sound like a logically mirrored reflection of a religious
extremist.
It was easy for the pro-Europeans to portray them as
extremists, especially since they
made common cause
against the common market with left - wingers like Anthony Wedgwood Benn and Arthur Scargill.
The speech he is to
make in Birmingham tomorrow will not only spell out that British values are the best weapon
against extremists.
These, of course, are exactly the sort of thing that
extremist copyright proposals like SOPA and the TPP work
against: by
making the companies that serve authors and their audiences bear the liability for infringement, we shrink the number of companies that supply authors and ensure that only big players like Amazon, Paypal, Apple and Google can occupy those niches.
Fast - forward to the 21st century: Politicians and
extremists who are dead - set on outlawing abortion and denying people the ability to
make their own health care decisions try to bring a one - two punch
against Planned Parenthood's health centers.
Kander quickly came to Planned Parenthood's defense when
extremist politicians targeted the care provided to tens of thousands of women Missouri health centers and millions across the country, standing
against wrongheaded Congressional efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and decrying politicians who
made women's health care a political punching bag.