Sentences with phrase «made against them they should»

Not exact matches

The real significance of the Google Patent Starter Program is instead more subtle, and should be seen against the backdrop of other moves Google is undertaking to change the economic incentives that have made patents such a problem for the tech sector in the first place.

But the Republican candidate has a potential ace up his sleeve when it comes to making a case against the New York Times should he decide to do that.

It should also have regular measurements and metrics to make it real, and it should be benchmarked against the competition.

The employer should make sure that they have a legitimate case against the employee in this instance because many situations are covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and other laws that protect employees.

The prime minister's Conservative party critics, who are already unhappy with her leadership on Brexit, are poised to speak out against her leadership should Labour make major gains across the country.

Every argument that you'd make against socialism you can make against socialized healthcare, and any candidate who isn't 100 percent committed to scrapping Obamacare is not someone America should elect president.»

Weighed against unemployment, which has dropped to a 16 - year low at 4.1 percent, that weakness has puzzled economists and made some policy makers declare the Fed should hold off on additional rate increases until prices respond more briskly.

Instead, they should position their businesses to make sure that technology is working for — not against — their companies.

But my point is we should be empowering families to make the choices they think are best for their kids, and that should entail ending discrimination in the tax code against single - income, two - parent families.»

If tax policy should be doing anything to change the income distribution, I would prefer it lean against these strong winds of inequality rather than making life still easier for those at the top.

She thinks that Lara should have called her HR department the minute her co-worker started making rude remarks in public, and especially when he tried to use his seniority against her.

That Jared Goff will have Sean McVay (the likely coach of the year), Todd Gurley (an MVP candidate), and an elite defense around him should make his first playoff game a bit easier, even against the reigning NFC champions.

Defense spending aside, transatlantic rifts could also occur should Trump continue to make critical foreign policy decisions without first consulting allies (as in the April 7 air strike against Syria in response to a chemical - weapons attack) or if he presses NATO allies to make stronger military contributions in Syria or Afghanistan.

Though Hogan isn't seeking further action against Gawker Media, he alleges that the company made a secret loan to Denton and that Denton shouldn't be afforded bankruptcy protection along with the company.

And even those lucky enough to have the entire home price in liquid assets should still weigh the benefits of making an all - cash offer against the costs.

The report has not yet been made public, but it should be possible to check these results against publicly - available data.

Investors should fully understand the features of any products or business projects they intend to invest in, and carefully weigh the risks against the return before making an investment.

Mr Trudeau's cabinet will make this decision without paying a lick of attention to blustery politicians like Brian Jean and Greg Clark because inter-provincial pipeline projects are nation building projects; they shouldn't pit one province against another no matter how much the boys want to strut their stuff in the media.

That was a major competitive advantage against debt - ridden rivals that are struggling to make past initiatives work, and First Solar's reputation for doing large projects should serve it well.

While commodities can be useful as a hedge against inflation, they generally shouldn't make up a very large portion of your assets — typically no more than 5 % to 10 % for most investors.

While commodities can be useful as a hedge against inflation, they generally shouldn't make up a very large portion of your assets — no more than 5 % to 10 % for most investors.

Your constant ridicule of God and believers should make you wonder why if there is no possibility of God must you fight so hard against it.

Right wing conservative types have a Jesus who is against gay marraige, is anti-abortion, thinks there should be prayer in school, and teaches the prosperity stuff and so on... Left wing liberal Christians quote the verses about giving up possessions, feeding and clothing the poor... inner city Christians often have a Jesus who is about social justice... we were made in His image?

No one should be beaten, mur dered, made fun of, or discriminated against for being gay.

I'm actually not against the ACA, but I do believe that coverage should be very scrupulous and, yes, people who make certain health and other additional cost incurring choices should not get the same ride as everybody else.

Yet the protest is ultimately one against any notion of a moral order, that there is an established way of being which demands a change in my behaviour, and that without such a change I am somehow less than I should be, that I ambecoming less than what I am made to be.

«I was attacking the argument that gay people must be discriminated against — and anti-bullying programs that address anti-gay bullying should be blocked (or exceptions should be made for bullying «motivated by faith»)-- because it says right there in the Bible that being gay is wrong.»

What should we make of these four facts, which seem to speak both for and against the idea that humanity is naturally religious?

CNN should stop making this an issue, it is not about religion, this a war against women by Bishops who have always thought they know what is best for women.

Correction: Religion SHOULD NOT be an issue against a political candidate, and it is Democrats who make it an issue.

If you are an atheist and do not believe in an afterlife, please do not make condemnations against faithful believers and likewise the faithful believers of there being an afterlife should not condemn those who dare not believe in an afterlife.

But you can always make a case that every person has the potential to make society better or more advanced and bringing harm to another human being should be against the law.

I do the best I can to speak out against injustice, to question hostility, to bring to light that perhaps one should know what they are talking about before making judgements.

I don't support Gay marriage or am I against it, its not affecting me or others freedom, so why should you make it illegal?

Policy decisions should be made against verifiable facts only.

Yes they should be defended against the bigots and I make no apology for that.

Mornings in Bodley, drowsing among the worn browns and tarnished gilding of Duke Humphrey, snuffing the faint, musty odor of slowly perishing leather...; long afternoons, taking an outrigger up the Cher, feeling the rough kiss of the sculls on unaccustomed palms, listening to the rhythmical and satisfying kerklunk of the rowlocks, watching the play of muscles on the Bursar's sturdy shoulders at stroke, as the sharp spring wind flattened the thin silk shirt against them; or, if the day were warmer, flicking swiftly in a canoe under Magdalen walls and so by the twisting race at King's Mill by Mesopotamia to Parson's Pleasure; then back, with mind relaxed and body stretched and vigorous, to make toast by the fire.

Instead of joining in a hue and cry against a churchman for engaging in this system in which every one of us is implicated, from which even the bishop's salary is derived, or hiding our Christian faces in shame because his hypocritical enemies hold him up as a «horrible example,» the clear call of Christ is that his followers should make a frontal attack upon the pagan system itself, and demand that our economic order shall give way to an economic order embodying the principles of the kingdom of God (July 17, 1929).

After one particularly offensive show on Aug 19, 2010 where he and his cohost, Crank, spent the morning railing against the «mentally diseased perverts» everyone else calls gay, preaching that women aren't equal to men and should be home raising the kids and making dinner, and Blacks need to kick their drug habits and get a job instead of freeloading off his hard earned tax dollars by trading in their food stamps for drug money, we started a blog documenting his abuses on the air waves.

The divine was driven out of nature not to turn nature into a technological instrument, but rather to make it the habitation of the devil; the religious «man» should shun it and flee from it in order to save «his» soul for a higher spiritual realm outside of and against the body and the visible, created world.

Theologians who have quite properly protested against the notion that God was such that he needed to be made friendly and available to his creatures by reason of some event (in this case the death of Christ) which opened up for him this possibility, have failed to see that in this inadequate and often misleading way of speaking, there was an insight of which they should have taken due account.

Like I said, should we be making laws against it?

There is at least one: since being is power, every being has some power just by virtue of being; but then it is metaphysically impossible that God should have all the power.20 Or to make this an internal argument against the classical doctrine, the conclusion could be softened to read: «If there is anything other than God, God does not have all the power there is.»

Religion being used against us does not mean religions are wrong but those on charge of ruling who were wrong and religion should not be blamed for it... religion has contributed much in educating us because from learning the Quran many became to read and write Arabic, beside that verses and the challenge within has made us read, think and observe creation with all that relates to it.

BC can make the statement Topher suggested above but the real question is can they or should they attempt to prevent others from providing birth control, and is it right to threaten disciplinary actions against those that do not agree?

Even if at this point God in heaven and all his angels were to offer to help him out of it — no, now he doesn't want it, now it is too late, he once would have given everything to be rid of this torment but was made to wait, now that's all past, now he would rather rage against everything, he, the one man in the whole of existence who is the most unjustly treated, to whom it is especially important to have his torment at hand, important that no one should take it from him — for thus he can convince himself that he is in the right.

You shouldn't let the actions of a few ppl make you prejudice against the majority.

Religion should not be in intwined into politics or forced on others, it can not be force feed or it will not be absorbed, a good example that religion does not always make things right is all you have to do is look at the catholics priest that are around religion 24/7 — eat and sleep it, yet they commit sins against young boys.

William you are a sick individual who condones violence against others and should be investigated for making threatening statements about committing violence.

With 1,500 of them out there converting two Chin - amen apiece per annum against an uphill birth rate of 33,000 pagans per day, it will take upward of a million years to make the conversions balance the output and bring the Christianizing of the country in sight to the naked eye; therefore, if we can offer our missionaries as rich a field at home at lighter expense and quite satisfactory in the matter of danger, why shouldn't they find it fair and right to come back and give us a trial?