Sentences with phrase «made big bang»

Any one of Anna Oppermann's «ensembles» is something like a woman - made big bang.

Please tell me all knowing Paul how them molecules got into the universe to make the big bang happen.

As it turns out, the three - cylinder configuration not only makes a bigger bang but also the exhaust scavenging from the combustion chamber is better, which improves both the efficiency of the variable valve timing (featured on both the intake and exhaust side) and the ability of the tiny, 1.5 - inch impeller of the turbocharger to spool quickly up to its maximum speed of 248,000 rpm.

Hoping to make a big bang (see what I did there?)

[Response: lol This reminds me of when when I was a kid a car ran into our fence, making a big bang sound.

Not exact matches

It's reasonable to think that there are other realities not represented by our big bang; it's NOT reasonable to make claims about beings who live outside our big bang and what they want for our species and whatnot.

So naturally I'm envious that Ken Masugi and John Presnall made major contributions to BIG BANG STUDIES before I could get around to posting on the show.

evolution has nothing to say about the «big bang» it would be just as strange to say that «god» or some intelligence made the world and the universe, as you have to come to the obvious questions again..

ATHEISM does not make claims about what was before the BIG BANG either.

That's right, we've made of stars — created when they died; and they were created when other stars died; right back to the big bang.

There was an article recently about a young boy (12ish) who is the new math genius in the making and he is working on debunking the big bang theory with science.

You can not reject scientific reasoning (evolution, big bang, whatever you find annoying) and then attempt to use that same method of reasoning (logical reasoning, that is) to make any point.

you try and prove genesis fits perfectly with evolution and the big bang even with all the glaring contradictions and falsehoods that genesis presents just so you can make sure the bible still sounds truthful?

It came from a non-intelligent singularity that was positioned between the last two big bangs that morphed (as a butterfly would come from a caterpillar) through the last big bang having new, but completely natural properties that encapsulates genetic make - up of all living things.

This full view of God lifts up a God who is more than a Creator who made the world out of nothing, more than the God of the big - bang theory who began the universe and then left it to run on its own -

The common «creation story» emerging from the fields of astrophysics, biology, and scientific cosmology makes small any myth of creation from the various religious traditions: some ten billion or so years ago the universe began from a big bang exploding the «matter,» which was infinitesimally small and infinitely dense, outward to create the untold number of galaxies of which our tiny planet is but one blip on the screen.

@Unfortunate the big bang and biological evolution is not the same as someone making a computer or car.

there is no God but Allah, filthy denier of truth absolute, Al, the La, limited, H, high Mohammad the Limited truth, for more visit me at http://www.give-me-a-virus.net for big bang, make sure to turn off virus protection and let Muhammed show his tricks.

The big bang proves a creation of our Universe and that makes her feel good about her assumptions about «God.»

And there is no need to make further extrapolations — how does this latest news change the alleged situations from big bang till now differently than what the BBT or BVG suggest?

@greatbuddy, I don't see how this is viewed as the big bang, nor how one could possibly think «every living thing» was made from water.

Here's another one: An entirely natural wormhole opened in the space - time continuum, and a guy from the present got sent into the past, and told someone about the Big bang theory, and that story made it into the Quran.

Christians says faith is the evidence of things not seen but the die hard «the big bang is true» refuse to admit that all they have is evidence for the thing not seen thus making it a belief.

The big bang does not state that something comes from nothing, and the rest of your argument is ludicrous.This is why Bill Nye is right - a lack of scientific understanding results in a nation full of ignorance and lack of critical thinking; not good for a nation that is basically making money by being on the cutting edge of technology.

Please list this «great deal of evidence» — I'd like to examine it, especially since we know of nothing at all «pre big bang» or whether there is a «pre» or whether the statement even makes sense.

Using god for science is wrong.Materials be came present after the big bang as atoms.Eventually processes started which created rock.Our planet came together with many materials, such as gold, platinum and others.When a rainforest dies when it dries up, gets buried and compresses to form coal.Oil is made from sea organisms that die and get buried.The brain uses algorithms to process information.God does not need to be included.

When the molecules reach these speeds, and randmly colide, you get «the big bang» which really does nt even have to be that big, it only has to be enough to make «molecules» begin to move through time.

weak nuclear force constant if larger: too much hydrogen would convert to helium in big bang; hence, stars would convert too much matter into heavy elements making life chemistry impossible if smaller: too little helium would be produced from big bang; hence, stars would convert too little matter into heavy elements making life chemistry impossible

The big bang theory is a man made hoax after all.

ummm just look up during a bright sunny day... our star is a micro version of that very event, don't believe me give it a few trillions years and see how big of a bang our star makes.

The big bang has evidence and make's sense, it's a fact that the universe is expanding therefore logically it had a point where this expansion begun and the evidence suggests so.

The big bang «Theory» is that all the energy and matter that makes up the known universe blew apart and made things they way they are.

Science went to a lot of trouble to finally conclude that for the theory of evolution to apply to man; man was made from dust (organic and inorganic matter that was created by the big bang).

How the hell can Atheists believe in nothing yet claim to believe in the big bang theory??? Makes no sense at all!!!!!

With reference to your comments, if you are asking «so what started the first DNA» (which it reads like), then you could also ask «what made thie big bang»».

People can choose to believe it, but that does not make it science and anything from it can not be legitimately taught as alternative theories of science, whether in astrophysics vs. the «big bang», biology vs. evolution or embryology, etc., or physics and geology in determining the age of the earth and universe.

Even a prominent atheistic believe it or not (I believe it was Frncis Crick, but can not recall for certain; but the statment was made nonetheless) looking at the evidence for the big bang concluded that aliens must have seeded the planet!

Goper reation according to the Divine Word of God Genesis 1 science in CAPS; FIRST CAUSE «In the beginning God» (v1)-- we are given the first cause, causation BIG BANG «created the heavens and the earth» (v1)-- matter and energy created, singularity establishing time and space «Earth dark formless mass «(v 2)-- chaotic sub atomic particles STAR IGNITION «Let there be light» (Day One)-- God was the light or light from reionizing the universe PLANETARY ACCRETION = > EARTH, MOON = > WATER = > ATMOSPERE «Separated the waters to make atmosphere» (Day Two)-- molten earth or water forming atmosphere as cools.

and to be fair to both of you (I've made a point to pretty mean - spirited thus far), I have always found evolutionary science and the concept of the big bang to be very very confusing and deep.

A beginning to space, time and matter only implies some «thing» not made of space, time and matter exists and caused the big bang.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

The big bang does make sense, it just doesn't fit with our current model of physics... that does NOT mean that the big bang is wrong because we're right.

I made them a bit too big (taking heaping tablespoonfuls a bit far) so I'll go a bit smaller next time and get more bang for the buck (in quantity.

«Wenger is giving the striker the self confidence and belief that should help him to start banging more goals in himself» i highly doubt that makes one a goal scorer... otherwise why bring about this question after welbeck has been involved in two goals??? To me walcot is a better option because of his finishing, smart runs, game reading, delivering during big games, good final touch and making it easier for the right back since he keeps defenders in deep in their half therefore, no need for him to be defensive.

Clemson's Kelly Bryant offers some unique challenges for the banged - up Alabama defense, but he's still probably going to have to make some big passes at some point since you can't run on the Tide without another threat involved.

If he still bangs his head to get your attention, though, try not to make a big deal about it, or you may reinforce the behavior.

The program will prioritize projects and apply resources to the buildings that can deliver the biggest bang for taxpayer dollars, while making sure to share case studies and building information with the public.

And their reasoning was revealed by none other than Blair's polling guru Phillip Gould, who described how he argued that the 1989 Policy Review proposals which shifted Labour to the right, should not be introduced on a piecemeal basis, as was being mooted as a way of minimising opposition but to»... make one big - bang presentation... Dissent in these circumstances did not reduce our electoral appeal, but heightened it.

The United States has «got to protect our rigorous peer review system and ensure that we only fund proposals that promise the biggest bang for taxpayer dollars... [And] make sure that our scientific research does not fall victim to political maneuvers or agendas that in some ways would impact on the integrity of the scientific process.»

Neutrinos that filled the universe a mere second after the big bang make up a third «dark» component of the cosmos, alongside dark matter and dark energy.