Not exact matches
No County officer, employee, department or other
administrative unit or subdivision thereof, or other spending
agency shall, during a fiscal year, expend or contract to expend any money or incur any liability, or enter into any contract which,
by its terms, involves the expenditure of money for any of the purposes for which provision is
made in the budget in excess of the amounts appropriated for such fiscal year or for any other purpose, except as otherwise provided in this code or the local finance law.
The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an
administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government
agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and
administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required
by the
agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise
making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted
by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption
by agency officials.
Individuals shall not, directly or indirectly, disseminate,
make available, disclose, or use any reason other than performance of their job with the Company, any confidential information or proprietary data of the Company, unless and only to the extent such release or disclosure is required
by any court or
administrative agency (and then only after prompt notice to the Company to permit the Company to seek a protective order).
As Judge Nancy Gertner highlighted in her Mueffleman decision (available here), in the federal system the major decisions about the imposition of punishment have been
made by Congress and the Sentencing Commission (an
administrative agency).
Judicial decision -
making provides five advantages not adequately provided
by administrative agencies: (1) a clear and exact burden of proof; (2) an opportunity to rigorously test the evidence for accuracy, integrity, and persuasiveness; (3) a thorough debate as to the correct interpretation and application of the law for the issues and evidence involved; (4) a decision
by a truly impartial and competent adjudicator; and, (5) the right to a jury trial, in situations allowed
by law.
Adoptive families may request an
administrative fair hearing whenever there is a disagreement with an
agency decision affecting their child's adoption assistance benefits, adverse action to the child's current assistance, or a request
made by the family is denied.
A court limits it review of determinations
made by the Commission to the following grounds: first, whether the action was supported
by credible evidence; second, whether the action was arbitrary or capricious; whether the action was beyond the power of the
administrative agency; and finally, whether action violated some statutory or constitutional right.