Some statements made to the press about climate and hurricanes were
made by climatologists who lacked expertise in the conditions generating these great storms.
Not exact matches
which have been
made by several highly - touted
climatologists in the past (some of whom post on this site from time to time).
Also, being on the Sierra Club web site does not discredit my arguments, which have been
made by several highly - touted
climatologists in the past (some of whom post on this site from time to time).
«All the claims
made by M&M have been rebutted in detail
by many other
climatologists and they insist that these folks are completely in error.»
Six years of warmer weather do not a climate change
make, not
by any
climatologist's yardstick.
All the claims
made by M&M have been rebutted in detail
by many other
climatologists; M&M insist they are completely in error.
When Gort first visited in 1951, it spent little effort on climate change issues, focusing on other aspects of our planet instead: Gort returned in 2012 to answer puny human
climatologist questions about whether climate change caused particular weather phenomena
by making an obvious point: rather than struggle with theoretical analysis, you can simply use your Climate Changeometer to remove all the excess greenhouse gases and aerosols above natural levels and then measure the outcome.
Why don't you continue to represent those fine coal industry geologists
by pointing out a few that «know much, much more about the mechanisms of the atmosphere and its variations over time...» than the
climatologists and atmospheric scientists that
make it their profession to know how atmospheres vary over time.
Der Spiegel online called the supposed global warming pause an «Inconvenient Truth for
climatologists» — an allusion to the climate change movie
made by former U.S. vice president Al Gore, who in 2007 shared the Nobel Peace Prize with the IPCC for his work on the issue.
Among the works cited
by the article is one
by the
climatologist Kevin Trenberth in which he states that the IPCC has never
made so much as one prediction.
I'll look forward to seeing the evidence to support your assertion that the point is
made «time and time again»
by climatologists.
An as yet unpublished paper
by NASA
climatologist James Hansen and others
makes the case that recent extreme heat events, such as Russia's 2010 deadly heatwave and last year's extreme drought in Texas, are directly linked to our warming planet.
The letter, organised
by Australian National University
climatologist Andrew Glikson, calls on the federal government to
make «meaningful reductions of Australia's peak carbon emissions and coal exports, while there is still time».
By Dr. Dietrich E. Koelle [Translated, edited by P Gosselin] Announcements that the Arctic sea ice would soon disappear have been among the most favorite of claims made by publicity - seeking climatologists and leading American politician
By Dr. Dietrich E. Koelle [Translated, edited
by P Gosselin] Announcements that the Arctic sea ice would soon disappear have been among the most favorite of claims made by publicity - seeking climatologists and leading American politician
by P Gosselin] Announcements that the Arctic sea ice would soon disappear have been among the most favorite of claims
made by publicity - seeking climatologists and leading American politician
by publicity - seeking
climatologists and leading American politicians.
The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the
climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated
by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has
made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.
Climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball and his legal team are confident they will deal their own fatal blow to two lawsuits filed
by UN climate extremists, thus putting an end to any claims that man -
made global warming has any scientific substance..»
A statistician
makes a claim that the mathematics being used
by a
climatologist are inaccurate, and the
climatologist cites another
climatologist (as an authority) who backs up his claim, THIS is an appeal to authority fallacy.
They are referring to a 1971 article written
by climatologist Stephen Schneider, in which he did, indeed,
make that prediction; however, as he himself now acknowledges, new evidence soon followed its publication that suggested that 1) the cooling impact of aerosols was not nearly as high as originally estimated and 2) there were many other gases in the atmosphere, including methane, CFCs and ozone, that had the same warming effect as carbon dioxide.
In his accompanying book, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It (Rodale Books, May 2006), Gore noted a July 31, 2005, study
by MIT
climatologist Kerry Emanuel that Gore said «supported the scientific consensus that global warming is
making hurricanes more powerful and more destructive» [An Inconvenient Truth, p. 92].
The supposed «global cooling» consensus among scientists in the 1970s — frequently offered
by global - warming skeptics as proof that
climatologists can't
make up their minds — is a myth, according to a survey of the scientific literature of the era....