Sentences with phrase «made by evolution»

Take a look at this offscreen Driveclub video, showing once again the amazing graphics made by Evolution Studios.

Not exact matches

A couple million years of evolution have taught us how to survive by making right decisions.

The second low - cost shift coming to the open - source and hacking world is a slower evolution in computing, but will be no less powerful — the democratization of programmable chips like those made by Xilinx and Altera.

And by evolutionary biologists do you mean biologist and Orthodox Christian Theodosius Dobzhansky who wrote «Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution»?

Making a judgement about a faith, be it Christianity or Islam, on the basis of a few extremists has about the same logical errancy as saying evolution is false because Hitler's murderous race purification rampage was fueled by his study of Darwin's theory, a truth written by Hitler himself.

You're talking about the type of «evolution» that we always knew existed and to make matters worse you're bragging about the advancements made by INTELLIGENT HUMAN BEINGS which still don't even come close to the complication of macro evolution but still required thousands of years of scientific advancement and knowledge and a team of researchers with high iq's working aroudn the clock with microscopes.

As creationists often do when trying to attack evolution, they stack the deck by raising a bunch of questions evolution makes no attempt to answer.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

Making Sense of Evolution by John F. Haught (Edinburgh: Westminster John Knox Press / Alban Press, 2010), 144pp, # 12.99

Those are obfuscatory terms made up by Creationists when they realized they couldn't deny evolution as an entirety anymore.

That argument is no different than a creationist thinking that proving evolution false makes them right by default.

«Micro» and «macro» evolution are obfuscatory terms made up by Creationists when they got backed into a corner and could no longer deny that evolution can be demonstrated.

Evolution by natural chance is not scientifically credible and I would hope that this would be made clear in your magazine.

Evolving morality is the version that is being argued here, the sort of evolution that says each person evolves in his own way and then lives by what he thinks will make him happy.

The Chicago School of Theology made much of its opposition to philosophical idealism; but its strategy of thought in transmuting evolution into something other than mechanistic naturalism was actually dictated and directed by the vestigial remains of its own personal idealism.

By all legitimate accounts, Darwin's theory of evolution has consistently made testable predictions.

Of course, if you reject the theory of Evolution on the premise that it's «ridiculous» and then turn around and tell me man was made from a pinch of dust by a super-wizard 6,000 years ago... well...

If we all came by evolution, do you think our existence makes any sense?

Amazing... taught to hate and critique evolution by a pastor, and you think Creationism makes more sense.

Conscience decisions were made by an intelligent outside force to affect the evolution of dogs into what they are today.

It is completely made up by creationist because they can't argue against micro evolution because it is continually happening right in front of them.

For example, the theory of evolution is contradicted by the existence of technically advanced pyramids that we could not even re-create today, or by ancient hieroglyphics that depict our solar system before Galileo ever made his discoveries, whereas these things fit perfectly well within the Christian account that acknowledges the antediluvian and / or pre-Adamic worlds.

«Founded by atheism, claimed by atheism, supported by atheism, and exclusively in the interests of atheism, suppressing without mercy every jot of evidence for the divine existence, and so making a positive rational faith in God wholly impossible, the doctrine of evolution may well be set down as not only a foe to theism, but a foe of the most thoroughgoing sort.»

By the way, Chard, did you ever manage to make any connection that was based on fact between your «god» and evolution or the Big Bang?

the bible says the world is flat, that evolution is wrong, that the universe was made by magic.

The term moderate evolution might therefore be applied to a theory which simply inquires into the biological reality of man in accordance with the formal object of the biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that human biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance with the fundamental methodological principles of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality of man and to the origin of this whole reality.

According to evolution things are made by themselves things just happen by chance to say that evolution knew than humans would need to eat to survive suggests that something would have to know this are they considering evolution is a thinking force that knows what a creature needs to do to adapt ti certain things or that evolution knew that spiders needed to make webs to catch flies?

Projected forwards, this law of recurrence makes it possible for us to envisage a future state of the Earth in which human consciousness, reaching the climax of its evolution, will have attained a maximum of complexity, and, as a result, of concentration by total «reflection» (or planetization) of itself upon itself.

The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assMake a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assmake amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.

Though «human evolution» is a theory, considering the fossils and evidence of proto - human beings, it is far more likely that we evolved from a lesser developed ancestor than it is that we were made out of dirt by a supernatural deity.

For as has been made vivid by the argument about evolution, two tendencies of thought are between them posing a serious threat to the continued health of scientific endeavor.

And, hopefully people who actually want to «prove evolution wrong» by studying PE and its contributing process will help further define our understanding of evolution to make it even more accurate and comprehensive than it is today.

Most Likely to Make You Think (nominated by Joe Watkins): David Nilsen with «On Evolution and Sin» «We can strive for survival of the fittest, or we can seek the survival of the weakest, the least of these.

Charles Darwin's own trek made him one of the most suspicious of and troubled by the Evolution Of Species.

Given the parallel drawn in the passage by Whitehead between the consequent nature's evolution and the evolution of the world, and given the contrast he made there between the consequent nature's evolution and the completeness of the primordial nature, we can only conclude that since the consequent nature evolves it is incomplete, it grows, and it changes.

Even if that quote made sense it wouldn't explain how humans came to be or why the «design» is clearly imperfect but not surprising is easily accounted for by evolution.

Clearly by making that statement, you are ignoring other options for the case of a person not believing «evolution», namely.

Science went to a lot of trouble to finally conclude that for the theory of evolution to apply to man; man was made from dust (organic and inorganic matter that was created by the big bang).

@ GodPot «By calling it «theistic evolution» you are making the claim that you «know» what it was that started the evolutionary process.»

@Chad — By calling it «theistic evolution» you are making the claim that you «know» what it was that started the evolutionary process.

The scientific understanding of the origin of species through evolution made nonsense of the origin of species by special creation.

Evolution is not something made up by humans thousands of years ago to scare people into following the rules because one might go to hell.

You see, if evolution is true, science has an even bigger problem than Cain's wife to explain — namely, how could man ever evolve by mutations (mistakes) in the first place, since that process would have made everyone's children deformed?

Philosophy and theology might make an important contribution to this fundamentally epistemological question by, for example, helping the empirical sciences to recognize a difference between... evolution as the origin of a succession in space and time, and creation as the ultimate origin of participated being in essential Being.»

By summing up this spontaneity (making its successive moments simultaneous) sufficient energy could be accumulated and released to influence the «hair - trigger» behavioral mechanisms of the brain.23 A similar explanation is available to Bergson to account for the manner in which the vital impetus could influence evolution,

We can not go back to simpler times and simpler tales — tales made by clans and tribes and nations when the world was large enough for each to pursue its separate evolution.

I hope also, it will, by shedding further light on the place of mathematics in Bergson's universe, allow us to make sense of the otherwise murky «vitalism» of Creative Evolution, and of the possible heuristic value of Bergson's approach to biology.

If evolutionary theory is replaced by a better theory that can explain the facts of evolution and make correct predictions, then science and the whole world has benefited.

Moltmann and Pannenberg, the leading exponents of the theology of hope, make less of social evolution but believe that Christians are summoned to action in society by the promise of an eschatological future.