The predictions
made by evolutionary theory have also been correct and observed to be correct on the micro-evolution level.
Not exact matches
Does the acceptance of the Big Bang
theory and
evolutionary theory by many leading scientist
make these true?
Even though the strict Darwinian
evolutionary theory makes no sense and is being refuted bit
by bit
by new findings.
As you may have heard, renowned Old Testament scholar Bruce Waltkeresigned from his position at Reformed Theological Seminary last week amidst controversy surrounding statements he
made in support of
evolutionary theory in a video posted
by the BioLogos foundation.
He then
makes the crucial point that materialism and reductionism are philosophical
theories «that are in no way entailed
by the practice of
evolutionary biology».
To some outraged spirits, no doubt, Man appeared diminished and dethroned
by this
evolutionary theory which
made him no more than the latest arrival in the animal kingdom.
If
evolutionary theory is replaced
by a better
theory that can explain the facts of evolution and
make correct predictions, then science and the whole world has benefited.
Well, that is all fine and good but I hope you can see that those of us who find the similar claims
made about
evolutionary theory and AGW
by naysayers to both be wrong will not find this argument very compelling.
You've
made claims about AGW that are exactly the sort of claims
made about evolution
by those who attack
evolutionary theory (no empirical evidence,...).