Not exact matches
Price difference
makes profitable to
export cheaper hydro power from the Nordic market to Germany, which relies more on
coal and gas to generate power.
«We see a Chinese economy gradually shifting from construction to consumption, and so, we will transition,» said Mackenzie adding that «We imagine we will continue to creep our
exports of steelmaking materials like metallurgical
coal and iron ore, but we're much more likely to
make major investments in what we feel are the next phase of China's growth in energy and in food.»
Admittedly we are a net importer of oil (increasingly so as Bass Strait reserves diminish), but Australian entities
make large
exports of natural gas and thermal
coal, whose prices are highly correlated with oil prices over time.
A cable - stayed bridge over the Fraser River and a big earthquake could
make for massive problems Daniel Wood is an investigative journalist uncovering the truth behind the Massey tunnel replacement For those hoping to halt the
export of thermal
coal from the lower Fraser River, it's useful to consider a century - old American spiritual song that -LSB-...]
Questions remain as to whether American
exports of domestic
coal can
make up the difference.
He ran a huge budget deficit but
made up for it with profits from his
coal exports.
Make global warming worse because the
coal gets
exported, which adds plenty of carbon during the trip.
So if the world moves toward a system for tracking emissions, who is responsible for a particular batch of carbon dioxide — the company that mined and sold the
coal, the power plant that burned it, the consumer who buys the
exported widget
made with the electricity generated by that combustion, or...?
That said, I think Andrew may have been wondering about which COUNTRY has to count the emissions toward their cap or target — the country that
exports the
coal, the country that
makes (say) the cars, or the country that buys them?
We could stop
exporting coal tomorrow and
make a HUGE difference.
If the
exporting region is rich in
coal resources, like Shanxi, this line will mainly transmit
coal power throughout its lifetime, unless new transmission investments are
made to connect other areas with renewable resources.
The Tyndall Center study estimates that the burning of all that
exported coal could erase fully half the gains the United States has
made in reducing carbon emissions.
Now, he will take office as one of the most controversial battles over the nation's energy and environmental future is raging in his backyard — whether to
make the Pacific Northwest a hub for
exporting coal to Asia.
This misguided belief can be traced to a major mistake
made in the 1980s in energy and trade policy, to stake Australia's competitiveness on
coal exports.
A November 2007 presentation to investment analysts by the President of BHP Billiton
Coal, Dave Murray, noted that Drummond had an 5 % share of the global coal export trade, making it the equal fifth largest coal exporter in the wo
Coal, Dave Murray, noted that Drummond had an 5 % share of the global
coal export trade, making it the equal fifth largest coal exporter in the wo
coal export trade,
making it the equal fifth largest
coal exporter in the wo
coal exporter in the world.
Indonesia... the worlds largest
coal exporter is working hard on
making it's
coal more expensive to
export... http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/regulation-flares-indonesian-
coal-prices/443212/
Carbon Tracker's «
Coal supply Cost Curve» study published last year found that globally approximately $ 142 billion of future investment (capex) in coal mines for export to 2025 requires a $ 75 per tonne breakeven price to make a ret
Coal supply Cost Curve» study published last year found that globally approximately $ 142 billion of future investment (capex) in
coal mines for export to 2025 requires a $ 75 per tonne breakeven price to make a ret
coal mines for
export to 2025 requires a $ 75 per tonne breakeven price to
make a return.
A
coal -
export terminal proposed in Washington state would increase cancer risks for some residents,
make rail accidents more likely and add millions of metric tons of climate - changing greenhouse gas globally every year, according...
It
makes a mockery of Queensland's emission reduction targets if expansion of
coal and gas
exports outweighs the climate benefit of meeting those targets.
Located just two hours north of Portland, Oregon, along the Columbia River, the proposed terminal would ship a maximum of 44 million metric tons of
coal from the Western United States each year to markets overseas,
making it, if built, the largest
coal export terminal in the country.
Power's report provides a direct and evidence - based refutation to
coal industry claims that US
exports make no difference to foreign
coal consumers.
Over 68 % of total U.S.
coal exports in 2010 were coking
coal, which is used in
making iron and steel.
Consider this; reduced Australian
coal exports may account for up to 200Mt less global CO2 in the last year which
makes the ETS seem rather pointless anyway.
The letter, organised by Australian National University climatologist Andrew Glikson, calls on the federal government to
make «meaningful reductions of Australia's peak carbon emissions and
coal exports, while there is still time».
Again, it's not just that burning tar sands oil produces a lot of emissions; it's that long - term capital investments like Keystone (and
coal plants, and
coal export facilities) «lock in» those dangerous emissions for decades and
make catastrophic climate disruption inevitable.
Decisions the Northwest
makes now will impact Chinese energy habits for the next half - century; the lower
coal prices afforded by Northwest
coal exports encourage burning
coal and discourage the investments in energy efficiency that China has already undertaken.
The point Jason and I are
making is simple, you could stop all the
exports from Canada and the US and it won't
make it damn difference how much
coal the asian countries are going to burn.
In
making the arguments about the
coal -
export impact you have to use a figure for the the increased
coal burning, not the total
coal burning.
At the same time, another climate drama is playing out with much less attention as
coal companies
make plans to
export huge quantities to Asia by way of Pacific Northwest ports.
If we
make it harder for
coal companies to
export, that's a good thing.
President Francois Hollande announced an end to
export credit financing for
coal,
making France the latest domino to fall as countries and banks commit to ending support for this deadly fossil fuel, whose pollution kills up to 100,000 people in India and 250,000 people in China every year.
If life were a James Bond movie, the villain would be Chinese and he would hatch a diabolical plot to scare the western world into destroying its manufacturing base by
making energy really expensive and to burden it with so many stupid regulations that 10s of millions of jobs would be
exported to China where they would burn vast quantities of
coal and produce so much CO2 that whatever western nations did it would never come close to reducing emissions at all.
Westshore
coal export terminal at Roberts Bank, in Delta, is the largest
export facility on the Pacific coast and there are plans to
make it larger.
Coal makes up one - quarter of the country's
exports, which go off to countries like China and are a major contributor to climate change.
Since the country can no longer earn revenue from
coal exports, it
makes sense that it might put some
coal to use generating electricity for a bitcoin mine.