Sentences with phrase «made global warming claims»

Last week Morano posted again on the subject: an update to a U.S. Senate Minority Report with a title that explains its content: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims: Scientists Continue to Debunk «Consensus» in 2008 & 2009.

While he was working with Senator Inhofe, Morano helped author a report titled «More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims,» which was initially released in 2008.

(See, U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims Scientists Continue to Debunk «Consensus» in 2008 & 2009)

He claims in a Senate Minority Report, More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims Scientists Continue to Debunk «Consensus» in 2008 & 2009.

Featured on page 168 of the 2010 Special Report updated from U.S. Senate Report: SPECIAL REPORT: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims — Challenge UN IPCC & Gore:

He was also among the US Senate Republican Party's «list of scientists disputing man - made global warming claims», which stated that Tol «dismissed the idea that mankind must act now to prevent catastrophic global warming».

The latest: «Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man - Made Global Warming Claims in 2007.»

«U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims Scientists Continue to Debunk «Consensus» in 2008» (PDF), U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, December 11, 2008.

Dr. Gray's research is featured on page 155 of the 2009 edition of the 255 - page «U.S. Senate Minority Report Update: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims»

«Update: U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims - Scientists Continue to Debunk «Consensus» in 2008 - Released: December 11, 2008,» The Inhofe EPW Press Blog, December 20, 2007.

SPECIAL REPORT: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims — Challenge UN IPCC & Gore

See: SPECIAL REPORT — Dec. 8, 2010: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims — Challenge UN IPCC & Gore: Climate Depot Exclusive: 321 - page «Consensus Buster» Report set to further chill UN Climate Summit in Cancun

The Minority on the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Commitee (read James Inhofe (R - Exxon)-RRB- has just released a «report»: 0ver 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man - Made Global Warming Claims in 2007.

See: The Australian: Climate Depot's «report contained 1000 names of eminent scientists who are sceptical» of man - made global warming claims.

This updates the 2009 U.S. Senate Report: «More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims.»

report contained 1000 names of eminent scientists who are sceptical» of man - made global warming claims.

See: SPECIAL REPORT: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims — Challenge UN IPCC & Gore — Dec. 2010

More than 700 international scientists dissent over man - made global warming claims.

U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man - Made Global Warming Claims in 2007.

March 2009 U.S. Senate Report: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man - Made Global Warming Claims

Not exact matches

China's Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin told reporters that Trump's previous claims that the country had created global warming to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive simply couldn't be true because other Republican presidents worked on climate negotiations.

The Province of B.C. is willing to make significant environmental sacrifices for projects that will bring economic benefits to the Province of B.C.. On the other hand, they will block a project needed by a land - locked sister province, a project that would benefit all of Canada, claiming that they are doing so because they must protect the environment, protect the land from damage and reduce global warming.

anyone who claims that humans cause global warming has made an extraordinary claim.

The views of a visiting pope, respected by Catholics and many non-Catholics alike as a moral and spiritual leader of great prominence, will not make persons now unconcerned about global warming suddenly begin to grow concerned, nor even make skeptics of religious freedom begin to take its claims more seriously.

Safety concerns over fracking are overblown — but so are the boosterish claims made for its environmental and economic benefits (see «Fracking could accelerate global warming» and «Frack on or frack off: Can shale gas really save the planet?

«These claims amount to nothing more than ideological grandstanding to say whatever they can to make «global warming» an urgent priority,» he said.

Climate change deniers claim that the emails expose a conspiracy at work to make human - induced global warming a fact.

However, Bellamy has become a prominent global warming sceptic and has made a number of notable claims in the media.

Lomborg, a Danish political scientist with a background in statistics, argues in his text that claims made by environmentalists about global warming, overpopulation, energy, deforestation, species loss, water shortages, and a variety of other issues are exaggerations unsupported by a proper analysis of environmental data.

The main claims of fact he makes in support of his contention that Global Warming science is an «idealogy, underpinned by false assumptions» are:

Still, it seems to me that even a rough estimate of the extent to which increasing solar output is raising temperatures on Mars would be a useful reality check on the «global warming» claims being made here on Earth.

In the paper Gray makes many extravagant claims about how supposed changes in the THC accounted for various 20th century climate changes («I judge our present global ocean circulation conditions to be similar to that of the period of the early 1940s when the globe had shown great warming since 1910, and there was concern as to whether this 1910 - 1940 global warming would continue.

Today, in times of resource scarcity, global warming and impending nuclear conflict, this claim is being boldly asserted once again — in the form, however, of a private - sector undertaking driven primarily by US tech billionaires from the new space industry, not least — as they claim — in order to secure the survival of mankind against home - made planetary collapse.

I think this is useful for evaluating emission (and other tangential) reports claims / stories that might lead folks to think we are making significant progress in responding to global warming.

There is no doubt that some environmentalists make exaggerated claims on global warming, but when was the last time these were shown in a major news outlet?

Having read other material on the consequences and relationships of CCN's and lifetimes regarding papers that have been written, it seems that a lot of the papers coming from the Svensmark angle, so to speak, are not conclusive enough of definitive impact in the impact potentials for global warming, to jsutify the claims made by Svensmark, or the press about his, or similar, work.

There will undoubtedly also be a number of claims made that aren't true; 2008 is not the coolest year this decade (that was 2000), global warming hasn't «stopped», CO2 continues to be a greenhouse gas, and such variability is indeed predicted by climate models.

It's incredibly hypocritical of global warming denialists to whine that compilations of global temperature anomaly like GISTEMP have large distances between recording stations and this makes them an inaccurate estimate of global anomaly and then we have a global warming denialist extraordinaire, Roberts, claim that a SINGLE locality, Central England, can provide an adequate estimate of global anomaly.

Muller finishes his WSJ editorial with claiming that Berkeley Earth does not find out whether global warming is man - made.

In 2004, the Dane made his name as a green contrarian with his bestselling book The Skeptical Environmentalist, and outraged scientists and green groups around the world by arguing that many claims about global warming, overpopulation, energy resources, deforestation, species loss and water shortages are not supported by analysis.

The same error is made by those who claim that the 1470 - year cycle associated with the DO events could lead to an «unstoppable global warming».

The point I am trying to make is «when it is claimed that DO events represent a much larger and more rapid climate change than anthropogenic global warming,» perhaps DO events do cause rapid regional climate change larger and more rapid than anthropogenic global warming generally.

For an administration that has packed its regulatory agencies with people who want to claim that global warming isn't really a problem, Bush's vague prognostications about technological solutions are consistent with a general desire to do as little as possible to make real changes.

Why would the people who claim that global warming isn't a problem shoot down a satellite capable of making the measurements to prove their claim?

I challenge anyone to find a single published scientist who will make the claim that the total biomass on earth will actually go DOWN with global warming (of 5.8 degrees Celsius or less).

The main claims of fact he makes in support of his contention that Global Warming science is an «idealogy, underpinned by false assumptions» are:

Regarding eugenics, you forgot the overwhelming similarity that they were both widespread, media - friendly, commonly - believed «facts» that proved to be false (whether or not Global Warming is false is obviously debatable, but he's operating with that disclaimer when he makes the comparison, and thus it is necessary to operate under it when disputing his claims.)

Come on you soil experts, you must be able to document this before making any kind of reasonable global warming claim about grasslands.

It'd be nice if Lindzen gave his reader some way of checking the claims he makes about persecution - was Tennekes dismissed because he questioned the scientific underpinnings of global warming, or just after?

It is no surprise that it comes up because it is one of the most popular claims made by the global warming deniers.