Sentences with phrase «made in a certain way»

the idea here, as I understand it, is that we are made in a certain way, and when things hurt it's because somethings wrong, like you say — «I find that if I ignore that part (the creative part) of me for too long, then I begin to suffer.»
But in fact there's no requirement in Australia for Greek - style yoghurt to be made in a certain way or contain particular ingredients.
If you wanted to find that sentence and change its meaning, you take a piece of DNA and you synthesize it or make it in a certain way that it says, «I think we should not go out to lunch today in New York today.»
Perhaps the people consuming them made them in a certain way that created scum or mold?

Not exact matches

«It's not a technical problem; it's that I have to structure my company in a certain way that doesn't make sense for the company.
If you are trying to make changes in your life and someone reacts a certain way because of their baggage, it's up to you to say «no».
LinkedIn could (eventually) make money by taking a cut of any financial transactions between parties (as Fiverr does), by charging service providers a fee to be featured more prominently in certain categories, or in a myriad of other ways.
Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters make decisions based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do think that there is a certain profound lack of empathy in asserting that the only reason that some of them are voting the way they did is because they saw some fake news.
For example, if you decide to approach your business in a certain way that makes it a two or three year process to get to your first product, you can do that, versus being rushed into it by investors.
'' [Our team said] «How can we make sure that we can rebrand the channel, but in a way that we can refresh it constantly, so we're not stuck to a certain look and feel that will look old in six months?»»
As a startup, we made a commitment to a small group of investors to do certain things and run the business in certain ways.
The timeline to commercial use can vary — this year's picks, for example, range from technologies that are currently on the market to ones that are still in the lab and just barely making headlines — but two things have to be certain: The technology must be «fundamentally new,» and it needs to make a huge difference in the way we live for years to come.
«If one supplier quotes us a slightly higher price, but at net 60 days instead of net 30, we'll do a complete cost analysis to figure out which way we're better off, making certain we factor in our costs of money,» Blocher explains.
Soft robots, made of a material that allows them to switch between hard and soft states so as to squeeze through small spaces, have the potential to assist with space explorations, break ground in the way surgeries are performed and complete certain rescue missions.
In some ways we can say there is a certain element of entrepreneurs that are born, not made.
LinkedIn could (eventually) make money by taking a cut of any financial transactions between parties (such as Fiverr does), or by charging service service providers a fee to be featured more prominently in certain categories, or in a myriad of other ways.
From including a card on the table to encourage users to share and hashtag their photos with a particular branded message, to offering a rewards program for those who check - in at your restaurant a certain number of times, there are plenty of ways to ensure that you are making the most of your social media marketing efforts.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
The way he situates marriage alongside virginity is, to my modern eyes, certainly sobering; it's unromanticized, as it is made clear that the chief purpose of marriage is the begetting of children, and that is, in a certain sense, inferior to virginity.
Unfortunately (or fortunately) I no longer need to have that conversation because I am certain that my story would not be heard due to comment that were made by this person in response to Julie way early on in this discussion.
Most Likely to Make You Cry (in a good way): Jan Johnson with «Weeping Prayer» [found this over at Elizabeth Esther's blog] «In Christian spiritual tradition, certain kinds of weeping are a charism, or gift of the Spirit.&raquin a good way): Jan Johnson with «Weeping Prayer» [found this over at Elizabeth Esther's blog] «In Christian spiritual tradition, certain kinds of weeping are a charism, or gift of the Spirit.&raquIn Christian spiritual tradition, certain kinds of weeping are a charism, or gift of the Spirit.»
We can even say, in a certain way of speaking, that our Creator's whole point in making the world was that some of his creatures should share in his love.
In simpler terms, it suggests that players should act a certain way because the individuals who make the decisions that afford them their careers demand they must.
All the religions either have a philosophy or god / s which makes demands on them to behave in a certain way.
In some sense, indeed, Kierkegaard's life could be written as a kind of dark comedy; despite his premature death, and a great number of sadnesses that afflicted him along the way, there was something enchantingly absurd about his character, a certain benign perversity that often prompted him to make himself willfully ridiculous, and a peculiarly touching element of the ludicrous that clung to him all the way to his early grave.
In view of his age and the way the decision was made, it is almost certain that the shadow will not be lifted in his lifetime, if eveIn view of his age and the way the decision was made, it is almost certain that the shadow will not be lifted in his lifetime, if evein his lifetime, if ever.
To assume that a LGBTQ person is living in a certain way, including engaging in certain sexual activities based on the fact that they are LGBTQ reveals a significant knowledge gap on the part of those who make such assumptions.
Calvin, Institutes, I.vii.5: «Enlightened by him (the Spirit), no longer do we believe that Scripture is from God on the basis of either our judgment or that of others; but, in a way that surpasses human judgment, we are made absolutely certain, just as if we beheld there the majesty (numen) of God himself, that it has come to us by the ministry of men from God's very mouth....
Its an interesting and concerning that people can and do live in information silos (including me) and are kept their by leaders of institutional church who want them to think in certain ways like you must come to sunday church and made to feel guilty if they do nt.
In that way he had made explicit the central presupposition founding every form of scientific inquiry, the conviction that reality is rational and to a certain extent susceptible to human understanding.
Of course the very fact that the earliest Church could on occasion go on saying it in Jesus» way makes it difficult to be certain that any given saying originated with Jesus rather than in this earliest phase of the Church.
The speculative dogmatic, being itself aware of this to a certain degree, has known no other way to help itself but by the maneuver, not very seemly in a philosophic science, of throwing out a detachment of asseverations at the point where a movement is being made.
The problem is if you either don't have certain experiences or you have different experiences or you experience the same thing but in a different way, you are made to feel less than.
Urofsky seems to lean that way when he says, «In both instances, a decision is made to take or cease certain procedures in the expectation that death will result.&raquIn both instances, a decision is made to take or cease certain procedures in the expectation that death will result.&raquin the expectation that death will result.»
If change really involves self - transcendence even, in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though only in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being, which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate in nature but matter is in a certain way «solidified» spirit, the only significance of which is to serve to make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a change in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can only occur in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.
They tend to take certain passages and use them in their own way without using the entire context to make a point.
The recognition that it was through an event, and through that event as a whole, that God made Himself known in the characteristic way in which He is known within the Christian community — this recognition has certain practical consequences which I propose that we now consider.
So, this means that there is ONE valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to make people ponder various interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).
I think the answer is in general that God made the world so that if you live in certain ways then generally speaking your life goes better.
A great way to do this would be to force them to either pay an exorbitant tax if they make a certain amount of revenue, or let them choose to invest in a smaller business and help it grow.
If he abandons himself to this demoniacal influence, he then perhaps makes still another attempt to save Agnes, in such a way as one can, in a certain sense, save a person by means of the evil.
An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the ways in which certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches language to the culture as translating the culture's language back to the church; relevance means making theological sense of the depth that people discover in the oddest places of ordinary living and then using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply such a move in his reflections on beauty and transience in his Confessions).
To make the point he quotes Dawkins» own «perceptive» summary of Lot in The God Delusion: «If this dysfunctional family was the best that Sodom had to offer by way of morals, some might begin to feel a certain sympathy with God and his judicial brimstone» (Cheekily adding, «Well, Rabbi Dawkins, I think I'm very happy with that gloss!»)
«The first community, in order to affirm that Jesus was more than one of the prophets — that his authority had a certain finality or absoluteness about it not found in others — had few options left to it but to tell the story of Jesus in such a way that his authority would become apparent and would confront other hearers, as it had confronted those who had witnessed it, with the necessity to make up their minds — to declare themselves for or against Jesus.»
There are great differences among these three spokes - persons for social possibility and pathology, but they all focus on the fact that societies have ways in which to articulate and distort certain kinds of truth that make human life possible Or problematic.
It's not appropriate for men to use the Bible to make their female «friends» (that's in quotes because true friends don't treat each other this way) shut up every time they feel envious of their insight, and prefer to ignore the wisdom of certain women, rather than praying to God to give them some of their own.
2Pe 1:10 Therefore, brethren, be all the more diligent to make certain about His calling and choosing you; for as long as you practice these things, you will never stumble; 2Pe 1:11 for in this way the entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ will be abundantly supplied to you.
Then too, religionists of a certain proclivity have a touching need to believe that they are in some important way making history.
As a leader he does have a certain responsibility to his flock & maybe he should be more careful in the future and in no way I am not making excuses for him, I am just saying this: let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
If god made the universe in such a way that kids could never know about death or disease or deformity until a certain age, then maybe you could use an argument like that, but not the way things are.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z