the idea here, as I understand it, is that we are
made in a certain way, and when things hurt it's because somethings wrong, like you say — «I find that if I ignore that part (the creative part) of me for too long, then I begin to suffer.»
But in fact there's no requirement in Australia for Greek - style yoghurt to be
made in a certain way or contain particular ingredients.
If you wanted to find that sentence and change its meaning, you take a piece of DNA and you synthesize it or
make it in a certain way that it says, «I think we should not go out to lunch today in New York today.»
Perhaps the people consuming
them made them in a certain way that created scum or mold?
Not exact matches
«It's not a technical problem; it's that I have to structure my company
in a
certain way that doesn't
make sense for the company.
If you are trying to
make changes
in your life and someone reacts a
certain way because of their baggage, it's up to you to say «no».
LinkedIn could (eventually)
make money by taking a cut of any financial transactions between parties (as Fiverr does), by charging service providers a fee to be featured more prominently
in certain categories, or
in a myriad of other
ways.
Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters
make decisions based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do think that there is a
certain profound lack of empathy
in asserting that the only reason that some of them are voting the
way they did is because they saw some fake news.
For example, if you decide to approach your business
in a
certain way that
makes it a two or three year process to get to your first product, you can do that, versus being rushed into it by investors.
'' [Our team said] «How can we
make sure that we can rebrand the channel, but
in a
way that we can refresh it constantly, so we're not stuck to a
certain look and feel that will look old
in six months?»»
As a startup, we
made a commitment to a small group of investors to do
certain things and run the business
in certain ways.
The timeline to commercial use can vary — this year's picks, for example, range from technologies that are currently on the market to ones that are still
in the lab and just barely
making headlines — but two things have to be
certain: The technology must be «fundamentally new,» and it needs to
make a huge difference
in the
way we live for years to come.
«If one supplier quotes us a slightly higher price, but at net 60 days instead of net 30, we'll do a complete cost analysis to figure out which
way we're better off,
making certain we factor
in our costs of money,» Blocher explains.
Soft robots,
made of a material that allows them to switch between hard and soft states so as to squeeze through small spaces, have the potential to assist with space explorations, break ground
in the
way surgeries are performed and complete
certain rescue missions.
In some
ways we can say there is a
certain element of entrepreneurs that are born, not
made.
LinkedIn could (eventually)
make money by taking a cut of any financial transactions between parties (such as Fiverr does), or by charging service service providers a fee to be featured more prominently
in certain categories, or
in a myriad of other
ways.
From including a card on the table to encourage users to share and hashtag their photos with a particular branded message, to offering a rewards program for those who check -
in at your restaurant a
certain number of times, there are plenty of
ways to ensure that you are
making the most of your social media marketing efforts.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people
in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe
in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe
in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith
in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing
certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to
make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that
way?
The
way he situates marriage alongside virginity is, to my modern eyes, certainly sobering; it's unromanticized, as it is
made clear that the chief purpose of marriage is the begetting of children, and that is,
in a
certain sense, inferior to virginity.
Unfortunately (or fortunately) I no longer need to have that conversation because I am
certain that my story would not be heard due to comment that were
made by this person
in response to Julie
way early on
in this discussion.
Most Likely to
Make You Cry (
in a good way): Jan Johnson with «Weeping Prayer» [found this over at Elizabeth Esther's blog] «In Christian spiritual tradition, certain kinds of weeping are a charism, or gift of the Spirit.&raqu
in a good
way): Jan Johnson with «Weeping Prayer» [found this over at Elizabeth Esther's blog] «
In Christian spiritual tradition, certain kinds of weeping are a charism, or gift of the Spirit.&raqu
In Christian spiritual tradition,
certain kinds of weeping are a charism, or gift of the Spirit.»
We can even say,
in a
certain way of speaking, that our Creator's whole point
in making the world was that some of his creatures should share
in his love.
In simpler terms, it suggests that players should act a
certain way because the individuals who
make the decisions that afford them their careers demand they must.
All the religions either have a philosophy or god / s which
makes demands on them to behave
in a
certain way.
In some sense, indeed, Kierkegaard's life could be written as a kind of dark comedy; despite his premature death, and a great number of sadnesses that afflicted him along the
way, there was something enchantingly absurd about his character, a
certain benign perversity that often prompted him to
make himself willfully ridiculous, and a peculiarly touching element of the ludicrous that clung to him all the
way to his early grave.
In view of his age and the way the decision was made, it is almost certain that the shadow will not be lifted in his lifetime, if eve
In view of his age and the
way the decision was
made, it is almost
certain that the shadow will not be lifted
in his lifetime, if eve
in his lifetime, if ever.
To assume that a LGBTQ person is living
in a
certain way, including engaging
in certain sexual activities based on the fact that they are LGBTQ reveals a significant knowledge gap on the part of those who
make such assumptions.
Calvin, Institutes, I.vii.5: «Enlightened by him (the Spirit), no longer do we believe that Scripture is from God on the basis of either our judgment or that of others; but,
in a
way that surpasses human judgment, we are
made absolutely
certain, just as if we beheld there the majesty (numen) of God himself, that it has come to us by the ministry of men from God's very mouth....
Its an interesting and concerning that people can and do live
in information silos (including me) and are kept their by leaders of institutional church who want them to think
in certain ways like you must come to sunday church and
made to feel guilty if they do nt.
In that
way he had
made explicit the central presupposition founding every form of scientific inquiry, the conviction that reality is rational and to a
certain extent susceptible to human understanding.
Of course the very fact that the earliest Church could on occasion go on saying it
in Jesus»
way makes it difficult to be
certain that any given saying originated with Jesus rather than
in this earliest phase of the Church.
The speculative dogmatic, being itself aware of this to a
certain degree, has known no other
way to help itself but by the maneuver, not very seemly
in a philosophic science, of throwing out a detachment of asseverations at the point where a movement is being
made.
The problem is if you either don't have
certain experiences or you have different experiences or you experience the same thing but
in a different
way, you are
made to feel less than.
Urofsky seems to lean that
way when he says, «
In both instances, a decision is made to take or cease certain procedures in the expectation that death will result.&raqu
In both instances, a decision is
made to take or cease
certain procedures
in the expectation that death will result.&raqu
in the expectation that death will result.»
If change really involves self - transcendence even,
in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though only
in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being, which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate
in nature but matter is
in a
certain way «solidified» spirit, the only significance of which is to serve to
make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a change
in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can only occur
in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.
They tend to take
certain passages and use them
in their own
way without using the entire context to
make a point.
The recognition that it was through an event, and through that event as a whole, that God
made Himself known
in the characteristic
way in which He is known within the Christian community — this recognition has
certain practical consequences which I propose that we now consider.
So, this means that there is ONE valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text
in such a
way as to
make people ponder various interpretations (which would be a
certain kind of genre, but not most texts).
I think the answer is
in general that God
made the world so that if you live
in certain ways then generally speaking your life goes better.
A great
way to do this would be to force them to either pay an exorbitant tax if they
make a
certain amount of revenue, or let them choose to invest
in a smaller business and help it grow.
If he abandons himself to this demoniacal influence, he then perhaps
makes still another attempt to save Agnes,
in such a
way as one can,
in a
certain sense, save a person by means of the evil.
An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the
ways in which
certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being
in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches language to the culture as translating the culture's language back to the church; relevance means
making theological sense of the depth that people discover
in the oddest places of ordinary living and then using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply such a move
in his reflections on beauty and transience
in his Confessions).
To
make the point he quotes Dawkins» own «perceptive» summary of Lot
in The God Delusion: «If this dysfunctional family was the best that Sodom had to offer by
way of morals, some might begin to feel a
certain sympathy with God and his judicial brimstone» (Cheekily adding, «Well, Rabbi Dawkins, I think I'm very happy with that gloss!»)
«The first community,
in order to affirm that Jesus was more than one of the prophets — that his authority had a
certain finality or absoluteness about it not found
in others — had few options left to it but to tell the story of Jesus
in such a
way that his authority would become apparent and would confront other hearers, as it had confronted those who had witnessed it, with the necessity to
make up their minds — to declare themselves for or against Jesus.»
There are great differences among these three spokes - persons for social possibility and pathology, but they all focus on the fact that societies have
ways in which to articulate and distort
certain kinds of truth that
make human life possible Or problematic.
It's not appropriate for men to use the Bible to
make their female «friends» (that's
in quotes because true friends don't treat each other this
way) shut up every time they feel envious of their insight, and prefer to ignore the wisdom of
certain women, rather than praying to God to give them some of their own.
2Pe 1:10 Therefore, brethren, be all the more diligent to
make certain about His calling and choosing you; for as long as you practice these things, you will never stumble; 2Pe 1:11 for
in this
way the entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ will be abundantly supplied to you.
Then too, religionists of a
certain proclivity have a touching need to believe that they are
in some important
way making history.
As a leader he does have a
certain responsibility to his flock & maybe he should be more careful
in the future and
in no
way I am not
making excuses for him, I am just saying this: let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
If god
made the universe
in such a
way that kids could never know about death or disease or deformity until a
certain age, then maybe you could use an argument like that, but not the
way things are.