It even
made the moral choices throughout the game have a much bigger impact on which of the endings you got.
I personally never consider religion or atheist or secularism when
making a moral choice, and I am certainly not trying to prove I don't need religion to be a good person.
To be a sinner in the eyes of men, and presumably also in God's eyes, requires enough maturity, knowledge, and freedom to enable one to
make moral choices.
At that time human beings were distinguished from «lower» animals by virtue of the human capacity to think and
make moral choices.
Writing about «Harbor Seals,» also from The Theology of Doubt, Holden said the poem «charms the reader, even as it tempts the reader into a corner... that will require the reader to
make a moral choice as well as to reconsider many other kinds of choices about what to «believe.»
The Bible teaches that Man was created with the ability to
make moral choices and that he is responsible for those choices.
, Well, if I'm wrong, I will know
I made the moral choice, since I would refuse to worship a deity that is full of such cruelty, jealousy and hatred even if he did exist.
Given the variable ways that mental illness may impact an individual's functioning, it is important to understand that the mere presence of serious mental illness does not necessarily imply that it has compromised a person's ability to
make moral choices.
For a particular behavior to be considered evil, the person committing the act must be in a position to knowingly
make a moral choice between doing something wrong and doing something right, choosing the bad action over the good.
So, one of the things I wondered about was, How do doctors actually
make moral choices?
To understand how humans
make moral choices, researchers asked subjects to respond to a variety of moral dilemmas, for instance: Whether to stay and defend a mortally wounded soldier until he dies or shoot him to protect him from enemy torture and enable you and five other soldiers to escape unharmed.
The only reason Hammer has the contracts is that Stark has pulled out, thus the source of conflict — Hammer is only there because Stark has
made a moral choice not to be, not because he (Hammer) is the best.
It opens with the Rav (respected British actor Anton Lesser, primarily known for his Royal Shakespeare Company work and Game of Thrones) imparting the lesson about humanity's unique ability to
make moral choices that serves as the drama's key note.
Though there have been plenty of videogames that have provided players the ability to
make moral choices, none have managed to capture the many complex decisions that occur in that gaping divide between sickeningly good and seriously evil.
You'll even be given the chance to
make a moral choice at the end of each case, deciding when to absolve the guilty party — meaning perhaps speaking on their behalf or even letting them go entirely — or bringing the full force of the law to bear.
There are many instances in the game where you will have
make moral choices and the game will progress based on those.
Not exact matches
It's the same one that compelled Abraham Lincoln and Oskar Schindler to
make the correct
moral choices.
As a gay Christian, however, I was concerned by the way Williamson freighted in the idea of homosexuality as a
choice» hence subject to the same kind of
moral decision -
making as drug use or stealing.
2)
Make it clear in public that if you don't like the rock and roll, there are plenty of other churches, with hints that this decision is a
moral choice which reflects badly on you, not the community.
That was the
moral choice that you
made after so called «hormone balance» that you should better examine as a young Catholic.
Since Ms. Libresco's primary concern was for
moral authority, her
choice makes a lot of sense.
Both of these forms of Counter-Reformation Catholicism think of the
moral life as primarily engaging the will, whereas Evangelical Catholicism understands the
moral life to be a matter of training minds and hearts, the reason and the will, to
make those
choices that truly contribute to goodness, human flourishing, and the beatitude that enables the friends of Jesus to live forever within the light and love of the Most Holy Trinity.
If they were so «
moral» on their own, wouldn't they take the high road and accept that this person has
made a different
choice than they have.
It is a place of darkness to which all dead go regardless of the
moral choices made in life and where they are «removed from the light of God.»
What sets us apart is that we do have the POTENTIAL to
make conscious behavioral
moral choices and are not totally at the mercy of our subconscious instinctive impulses.
Nope, humans are exceptional, are higher amongst all of creation which
makes them, as created being to be unique when it comes to
moral choices they
make.
If we out right refuse to limit your rights,
make laws to take away
choices and push what we feel is
moral on to you, why can't you do the same for us?
I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my
moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that
makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray
choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...
The most important contribution the churches could
make, Munby maintained, would be to convene theologians and economists to prepare and circulate a report outlining the various technical approaches to dealing with inflation and showing for each the political and
moral choices that lay behind it.
Choices of profound importance had to be
made, not only by clans and tribes as a whole, but by minority groups and individuals, and nothing more imperiously calls out the sense of personal worth and dignity than the exercise of
moral choice.
I have never met anyone who thought it would me a
moral choice to subject their children to the most unimaginably horrific tortures because they
made a mistake.
The claim that actions are «undetermined,» however, is not the same as the claim that there are no identifiable variables that influence the
moral agent
making those
choices.
So, I sincerely and respectfully ask of individuals who back anti-
choice campaigns by citing personal
moral or religious reasons this question, which I ask out honest curiosity: how can you recognize the consequences, historically, of legally banning a certain
choice a person
makes, and maintain that your
moral code has not been violated, or even argue that your
moral or religious code has been upheld, or elevated?
Considered meta - ethically, then, a claim to validity for some
moral prescription claims validity for some obligatory evaluation of possible purposes, that is, some designation of
choices as those agents ought to
make or those reason requires.
On the other hand, the chief problem with the view of the new reformers is that it fails to recognize that a sexual self, liberated from undertakings that have a
moral claim upon it prior to any of its particular intentions and
choices, has no satisfactory way to
make moral judgments about what it intends, chooses, promises, and then undertakes.
The difference is that detachment leaves us in control of our passions rather than being controlled by them, frees us to
make loving
moral choices without becoming cold and distant in our relationships.
The primary reason for this is that it is often women who find themselves in the midst of almost daily ethical and
moral choices that they are called to
make in their own lives but also in the life of their families or communities.
First, with so much data to consider and so many goods to be balanced, those who stand outside the decision are in no position to pronounce on the individual
moral culpability of parents who
make these
choices.
christianity just says when you
make your free
choice, you should
make a rightous
moral one.
That is not to say that we always
make the «
moral»
choice, especially when the odds are that we can get away with pursuing our own survivalist advantages or disordered desires at the expense of others.
A man can only be
moral if he is confronted by a
choice and
makes that
choice.
The sheer length and complexity of great novels, their patient playing out of the consequences of our
moral choices,
make them infinitely more useful than the brief schematic narratives that are commonly employed by
moral philosophers to illustrate their claims.
Even so, Hartshorne takes a solidly pro-choice stance: that no one can fully understand the complexities an individual weighs when
making a decision about a pregnancy; that no governmental body is entitled to dictate to individuals what the available
choices are, including abortion; and that ultimately the woman directly involved has the right to
make a decision about her commitment to a pregnancy without
moral condemnation.
And some gay people feel that gay sex is wrong (and many have at some point in their lives), so they are clearly capable of taking a
moral stand on the issue (without the physical components of their brains being any different than someone who
makes a different
choice).
And now that so many deeds that once were thought to place a soul in the balance have become matters of
moral indifference, most of the
choices we
make are by definition unimportant, and the heroism or antiheroism of
moral choice is all but impossible.
We are all
moral people no matter our
choices we
make!
My beliefs have taught me to
make strong
moral choices and to stand up for what is right, even if it's unpopular.
The filth on TV, in movies, on You Tube, on the internet, and in music is a trap for those that have turned their hearts away from the
morals and values that help people
make the right
choices in life.
But it is essential to deal with it at some length, first, because some evangelicals have
made this charge; second, because the media have spread the charge far and wide; and third, because some religious people discussing AIDS seem to want to ignore the biblical teaching that there is a
moral order in the universe and that wrong
choices have consequences.
He has no need to seek it in anguish, to invent it... to shoulder the responsibilities of the
moral choice he has
made.