Sentences with phrase «made much empirical»

I think we have not made much empirical progress.

Not exact matches

To learn to put up with this empirical church is the way both of Christian humility at its best and of Christian growth in God's grace, not to mention the patent fact that such cooperation may do much to make the empirical institution more conformable to its intention and significance as the Body of Christ.

Hartshorne makes much of the a priori, as having something to do with «conceivable experiences,» the empirical then consisting of what is not a priori.

It was not until 1981, after much of the election furor had passed and the country was settling down to a new president that writers began to challenge publicly the empirical validity of many of the claims which had been made about the size and influence of the religious broadcasters.

It is unlikely that empirical evidence will shed much light on the matter of when in a teacher's career high - stakes decisions (e.g., licensure or tenure) should be made.

The Pope's gatekeepers and advisers can take much of the credit for making sure he did not hear about the actual climate science empirical evidence.

Many possibilities are theoretically possible, and some may be realized over intervals much longer than the recent centuries (e.g., orbital forcing), but the empirical data make it hard to attribute a major contribution to these during much of the previous century relative to forced trends.

Normal, non-ideology-based scientists question the veracity of the CRU — IPCC flavoured results just because the JBM camaraderie - based group did refuse to honour such requests and people ask the following question: why, if both the empirical results — the raw data (including the nitty - gritty details of the temperature measurements) AND the theoretical model - based machinery are above board and the overall climatological picture of a man (n)- made warming is pretty much a safe bet, why then would some AGW researchers like the JBM gang refuse to accept that they, too, have got to conform to normal scientific procedure and release the raw data and the details of the theoretical machinery used to understand those data?

Improved empirical data can define climate sensitivity much more precisely, provided that climate - induced aerosol changes are included in the category of fast feedbacks (human - made aerosol changes are a climate forcing).

Here is what makes me immediately suspicious, even at this point in the article: No one can acurately come up with an empirical proof of how much of the warming from 1973 - 99 was due to man's activities and how much was due to natural effects (the best you can find are studies that say «most» or «a lot of» or «some».