Sentences with phrase «made on either side of the debate»

There are points to be made on either side of the debate, but I trust that after you hear me out on this, you'll agree with me.

Professor David Luban has suggested that: «Respectable arguments can be made on all sides of this debate» (see «Torture, American - Style», Washington Post, 27 November 2005).

Not exact matches

The company denied the accusations at the time, and over the past year Laurence Sellyn, Gildan's chief financial officer, has made concerted efforts to get on the right side of the debate.

Inc. asked two notable entrepreneurs who stand on opposite sides of the debate to make their cases.

What the president told Republicans, in other words, largely echoed the report's findings — and it makes perfect sense he would do so: killing the hype on both sides of the Keystone debate is the first step toward turning the conversation into a civilized exchange that can lead to compromise.

The CMA's ruling comes amid a growing debate on both sides of the Atlantic about the ethics of price hikes for old off - patent medicines that are only made by a few firms and where there is little competition.

The sort of remark I have in mind is the kind where, in a post about an unrelated topic, an author feels the need to bring up some moral accusation against the writer he is discussing and make very clear that he, the blogger, is on the right side of that debate.

Makes you wonder how loving a christian really is when they debate on the side of «pro-slavery»»

I've been on both sides of this so called debate and the atheist side makes perfect sense in this natural world.

Meanwhile the opposing side is made of largely a lot of seemingly logical «smart» often well educated people who are ironically no where nearly as «smart» as people out there generally think or realize so it literally becomes a debate of ignorant verses stupid on both sides which I do as a footnote occasionally find mildly entertaining.

They recognized, as United Methodists on either side of the abortion debate have recognized until recently, that the in vitro human embryo makes, at the very least, an iconic moral claim.

I have a feeling that the evolution debate might be our generation's Galilean controversy, which is why I am wary of making sweeping pronouncements about God being on one side or the other.

And if you stand on either side of the theological debate, then you should be aware of his arguments for the existence of God before you make any stance that is antagonistic to the existence of God.

I'm surprised CNN is willing to wage a debate on «science» vs. «creationism» with Bill as the spokesperson for the «science» side of the debate... I know, he IS the «Science Guy»... well, I'm bald and fat, but that doesn't make me an expert on follicular transplants or endocrinology.

Lots of debating (for want of a better word) going on about Pep and Mour, both good managers in their own way, both have been winners of the top prizes at the top clubs with the top players and neither having built a side on a lower budget which makes them cheque book managers.

I agree, however, with one point that's sometimes made on the other side of this particular debate, that our main focus in Parliament should be on issues that affect everyone, straight or gay.

There was a heated debate in Parliament on Thursday between the Majority and Minority sides of the House following a statement made in the House by the Minister of Communications, Mrs. Ursula Owusu - Ekuful, on the Radio Spectrum Audit carried out and the actions taken by the NCA to enforce the law on communication services in the country.

ALBANY — Advocates on both sides of a debate over New York's fracking marotorium are turning up pressure on Andrew Cuomo to make a decision, after having stalled long enough to get his re-election out of the way without any major controversy.

Advocates on both sides of a debate over New York's fracking marotorium are turning up pressure on Andrew Cuomo to make a decision, after having stalled long enough to get his re-election out of the way without any major controversy.

The Senate voted this week, after many years of debate on both sides of the aisle, to invoke the «nuclear option,» nuclear because it has the potential to make the Senate's already - tense partisan relations even worse.

On the plus side, the very openness of content standards makes them subject to improvement through experience and democratic debate.

Just imagine if we made better use of all the time, money, and human capital that was spent in these two states on both sides of the voucher debate.

As students make points on either side of the debate, anybody can adjust their position in relation to the line — or even move across the line!

And for those who do not sit firmly on either side of the charter debate — such as those curious about the possibilities for pragmatic solutions that might make public education more responsive while maximizing social well - being — waiting for more and better research also makes sense.

Allegations made about activists on both sides of the trigger debate at other schools prompted the Los Angeles Unified School Board to adopt parent trigger guidelines to ensure future campaigns are transparent, and to prohibit either side from using incentives or intimidation to win or sway parent support.

on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy Helpful Books for the Writing Process by Michelle Ule on Books & Such Literary Agency blog 3 Tips for Writing Heavy Emotional Scenes by Jami Gold Don't Cheat the Reader by Sally Apokedak on Novel Rocket How to Infuse Your Writing with Nostalgia by Frank Angelone on Copyblogger The Secrets Behind Buried Dialogue: Part One and Part Two by Lynette Labelle Crafting Multi-Layered Characters by Marissa Graff on Adventures in YA & Children's Publishing Writing Futuristic Fiction in (What Feels Like) a Science Fiction World by Imogen Howson on Pub (lishing) Crawl How to Spot Mary Sue in Your Writing by Ava Jae Taking the Road Less Taken (With Your Characters), guest post by Kristen Callihan on The Other Side of the Story with Janice Hardy The Ending Debate: Make Mine Hopeful by Marcy Kennedy Unusual Inspiration: Character Arcs Made Easy by Fae Rowen on The Writers In the Storm Blog 25 Things You Should Know About Writing Sex by Chuck Wendig Writing Craft: Action vs. Active Openings to Grab Attention by Kristin Nelson Writing Craft: Mechanics vs. Spark by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Writing Craft: Breaking the Rule: Show Don't Tell by Kristin Nelson on Pub Rants Give Characters Interesting Anecdotes by Mooderino on Moody Writing

Yes, many people are still fighting that war, on both sides of the debate, and it may well be some time before the most reluctant publishers realize that their cause is lost, but the gains made by self publishing have been so pronounced, so rapid and what is most important, so irreversible, that it's time to call it done.

Obviously, I haven't fully learned from Malthus» error: I'm on the other side of the debate, but still, I made long term guesses of what might happen.

While I'm still pretty upset, I guess Cookie is officially now the guard dog to the estate — which is semi-appropriate as I actually wanted to do a doghouse with a dog (who I was debating on making pink) on the right side of the Pink Carpet I have — ended up changing my mind about it though.

I'm not sure about this, and the fact that people on both sides of the debate tend to carefully choose a y - axis scale that makes graphs look a particular way doesn't help.

It is one of the more amusing aspects of the debate, especially when the extremists on one side point to the extremists on the other side, to make their case.

Scientists on both sides of the climate debate have been critical of Karl's paper and the adjustments made to temperature in the new data set, particularly the ocean data analysis.

When physicists from completely different sides of the debate all tell you that you are wrong, and for the exact same reasons, perhaps it might be logical for you to start learning from them and focusing on the areas in which they disagree instead of making a fool of yourself on the areas in which they agree.

The media have not made the debate easier when they often debate with equal numbers on each side of a given question.

For example you criticize the media with the sentence: The media have not made the debate easier when they often debate with equal numbers on each side of a given question.

The Goddard Institute has played a very prominent role on both sides of the debate over man - made global warming theory.

Many people on the skeptical side of the climate debate see Jerry Ravetz» «postnormal science» as part of the problem, indeed the man himself as responsible in large part for formulations such as those of the late Stephen Schneider regarding making a judgement about the balance between truth and effectiveness.

As far as hydrogen fuel cells versus electric cars or wind - powered land sailers, you can make arguments on all sides of the alternative fuel debate until you're blue in the face from too much CO2.

Being exposed to a avalanche of comments from the alarmists has made it clear to me that the cherry picking and bias is evident on both sides of this debate.

I'd just ask that those making strong arguments on the latter, on both sides of the so - called debate, would come clean on their motivations on the former too.

I've long intended writing a piece with the provocative title of «the Nazi Thing» on the puzzling question of what it is about the climate debate which makes people on both sides resort to using language like «denier,» «death trains» on the one hand, and «eco-fascism» on the other, when it's so obviously counterproductive.

History will record the NIPCC as the most significant contribution any person or group on the climate realist side of the debate made to helping society get back on track towards making climate and energy decisions that actually help the environment and society.

This fact mirrors the many varied positive claims that are made on the other «side» of the climate debate, but which seem to emerge axiomatically from the fact that «climate change is happening».

You've made yourself look foolish again here by trying to overturn a basic, well - documented and noncontroversial physical fact (the absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide) accepted by scientists on both sides of this debate.

(I suppose my comment could also apply to Lindzen, Spencer, and Christy's comments outside the peer - reviewed venue where I do think they have said some unfortunate things, but that wasn't the primary issue... and, as you noted, scientists on both sides of the debate sometimes make questionable statements in the public realm.)

As a side note, claiming «fabrication» in a nefarious way doesn't help, and generally turns people off to open debate on the issue because the process of infilling missing data wasn't designed at the beginning to be have any nefarious motive; it was designed to make the monthly data usable when small data dropouts are seen, like we discussed in part 1 and showed the B - 91 form with missing data from volunteer data.

Campaigners on all sides of abortion debates increasingly fall back on science to make their moral case.

No one (on either side of the debate) should be making hay (let alone predictions) off such new information.

In a damning parliamentary report, the BBC is criticised for distorting the debate on man - made climate change — for which it says the scientific evidence is overwhelming — through its determination to put the other side of the argument across.

Instead of wasting hours / years /... of debate, a crisp technical term sometimes sinks in better: Making folks flap their ears (if not scream) at least induces some brain activity on the other side, which raises the chance having afterthoughts later.