Whatever undergraduate physicists are told,
magnetic poles do indeed enjoy the single life, says Richard Webb
Not exact matches
This strange but educated guess came in response to strong evidence that seismic waves traveling through the inner core along the axis of the
magnetic poles complete their trip through Earth about four seconds more quickly than
do waves traveling from one side of the equator to the other.
And in particularly in his latter part of his career, I mean the stuff that he was
doing for example on
magnetic mono
poles still not verified, that's an absolutely beautiful piece of science; fundamental today in the way that quantum, advanced quantum field theory is
done.
Yet, despite their widespread use, at room temperature only three elements are ferromagnetic — meaning they have high susceptibility to becoming and remaining
magnetic in the absence of a field, as opposed to paramagnetic substances, which are only weakly attracted to the
poles of a magnet and
do not retain any magnetism on their own.
Not only
does the Earths
magnetic field wander around on time scales of a century or so, but every 100,000 years or so it completely changes direction, with the north (
magnetic)
pole becoming the south (
magnetic)
pole.
We don't know what happens to the
magnetic field strength when it switches
poles.
Many of science
does not include the difference in the circumference of the equator to the
poles, circular motion and the deflection of solar energy off a moving object, the energy difference of compression which has a huge impact to the atmosphere and under the planet's surface (centrifugal force), the possibility of two
magnetic fields, the force of the sun's
magnetic field in the sequence to the planets circular motion (bugs on the windshield effect), etc. etc. etc..
how
does that differ from TSI and variables such as
magnetic flux variation at
poles + + + plus other variables.