Sentences with phrase «main arguments always»

Not exact matches

The main argument against taking action to reduce carbon emissions has always been economic.

Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.

The main argument — always will be — is that the qualifier for all the humanity in a person is to attribute it MORE towards their god.

Because of this incompleteness God's subjective immediacy does not end, despite God's always having a specific satisfaction, and that is why there is, only in God's case, no perishing, With respect to all these points my argumentation rests on the reversal of poles in God (by which an aim is possible for God which is formally independent of any concrete actual world, while Christian does not use God's reversed polar structure but uses God's everlastingness as his main argument.

For Leclerc, however, the loss of immediacy (which is always present in the case of a normal serial society) forms the main argument for conceiving God as a society, because Leclerc considers «perishing» to be metaphysically required for every prehensibility, including God's (Review of William Christian, An Interpretation of Whitehead's Meta physics, Journal of Philosophy 57 [1960], 138 - 143; henceforth cited as RWC).

Why do so many religious people never answer a question straight up, always a side argument that deters from the main question.

From Neymar's perspective, there will always be that argument too that he wants to be the main protagonist at a top club, and with Lionel Messi and Luis Suarez beside him, he won't get that at Barca.

While always tempting to have that argument, it misses the main reasons why Labour fell so far short.

The main argument of the Doubting Thomases has always been that the chemical signs of fossil life in Martian meteorites are really terrestrial contaminants; perhaps microbe - laden water seeped into cracks in the rocks after they landed on the Antarctic ice.

Always try to look the solutions of your arguments from the main dissertation and then reframe them in the conclusion.

There is always an introduction which is followed by main thesis arguments and solutions chapter wise finally a conclusion is given at the end.

A thesis statement is always written by keeping the arguments and points that are discussed in the main part of the thesis.

If you think about it, that's completely bizarre as one of the main sceptical arguments is that there is always climate change.