Those who simply accuse me of not taking the Bible seriously are dodging
the main argument of the book by refusing to engage its message and focusing instead on its format.
One of
the main arguments of the book, as noted above, is that GCC states are not much different from other states and many of the developments they experience are similar to developments of Western states and are beyond Islam and oil.
Not exact matches
«The proclamation
of the Gospel», in addition to addressing the universal commission
of the Church and the relation to other religions, usefully rehearses the
main argument of Nichols»
book The Realm — An Unfashionable Essay on the Conversion
of England.
But these formal flaws in Taylor's
argument are not the
main difficulty
of the
book.
A
book about a great subject should be either very long or very short, long enough to cover the subject adequately or short enough to permit the presentation
of the
main line
of argument without cluttering detail.
RF: The
book's
main argument is that, as students
of international relations, we need to do more to collapse the divide between the domestic and global spheres
of analysis.
there is also this
book: The Great Cholesterol Myth I've read half
of the the
book, but the theory has been clearly established: basically the
main argument of the nutritionist and the cardiologist authors
of the
book, is that neither dietary cholesterol nor saturated fats will «directly» influence heart disease.
First
of all, the
book review should provide an objective summary
of the author's
arguments and
main ideas.
I'm starting now on what will I think be the hardest and most controversial chapter
of my
book — the
argument that the search for a macroeconomic theory founded on (roughly) neoclassical micro, which has been the
main direction
of macro research for 40 years or so, was a wrong turning, forcing us to retrace our steps and look for another route.
It might be worth checking them against the actual
book just to make sure they read verbatim, that's just the sort
of ammunition for someone like Plimer to engage in his trademark gabbledygook so he can attack a minor error rather than answer the
main thrust
of the
argument if he were to notice this post