Sentences with phrase «main best point»

But you look and feel what is the main best point.

In fact, Samsung cut down on the number of variants by disregarding an 128 GB model this year, a move which not only paves the way for the inclusion of microSD support, but also brings us to the next main good point — the variance.

Not exact matches

This video does a pretty good job of outlining the main points, however:

A good deck and strong data points are important but ultimately, if you want to deliver a persuasive presentation and seal the deal, it comes down to three main tactics.

Before I was CEO, running was my main stress reliever and it worked well, to a point, but then someone shared this book with me and it helped me figure out ways to further reduce stress and also recognize where I was allowing stress to creep into my life unnecessarily and affect how I was operating or interacting with others.

«I was given this book at the beginning of my manager journey, and the main point is that you're only as good as the team you surround yourself with.

Thus, the site experience is the main point of contact for us so we need to make sure it's top quality and the absolute best it can be.

Here's the main point: if done well, outsourcing can free your company to concentrate on what staffers and management know best.

As CNBC anchor Becky Quick pointed out this morning during their segment in which I joined, we may be entering that phase of the cycle where good news on Main St. is bad news on Wall St.. That is, accelerating wage growth may lead the Federal Reserve to tighten faster, slowing overall growth more than currently expected.

The main advantage for borrowers at TD include flexible choices between points and lender credits, as well as a high rating for customer satisfaction with its mortgage servicing.

For those who have more interest and time, I'm confident that if you follow my five main points you'll do better than someone who does not.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

My main hustle pays really well, so I'm focusing on building my investments to a point where my passive income can sustain my immediate living expenses and fund the potential side hustle before I'll even consider it.

The Reserve Bank of India cut its main repurchase rate by 0.25 percentage point to 7.5 %, citing weakness in parts of the economy as well as favorable inflation figures and structural overhauls included in the government's proposed budget.

The main negative point of being and atheist is that you accept that when you die you die for good.

This point may seem counterintuitive at first, since one of the main claims of the «new orthodoxy» is that it can offer a better reading of the Hebrew Bible.

However, the main point that I was trying to make is that I object to you blindly asserting that «believers» can not furnish logical, well - reasoned arguments in support of their position.

The presence of other divergences too (David Moss's luminous piece on friendship stands very well alone), the dispersal of the group on both sides of the Atlantic, and the fact that some members are already deep into other conversations all suggest that as a movement it will (at least in Britain) either fragment or at best fare like feminist, liberation and nonrealist theologies, and have its main influence as a point of reference and interrogation.

What has been discovered... is that, on one main point at least (the choice between the three propositions), religion at its best was literally and philosophically right, and theology was but a first approximation, vitiated by ambiguities or inconsistencies.

I think my main challenge at this point is that, like Christians, many Muslims are pretty antagonistic toward the Gay lifestyle as well.

The only big difficulty in following his logic is his tendency to digress from his main point then return; it doesn't translate well into English.

The common habit of using the Bible by concentrating on one verse at a time (which may or may not be a complete sentence) is at best a very slow, plodding way to get at the author's main points, rather like playing dominoes or checkers at the rate of one or two moves per day or per week, and at worst a fragmentation and distortion.

My main point is that the best defense of true science can often be found in its own axioms.

My main point is there are a lot of Christians who have done a lot of good in this world.

Stark writes: «The mangled grammar — shifting from active to passive to active voice, from a conditional «if» clause to a main clause with the wrong verb form (It should be «I will be deeply sorry»)-- suggests a confused point of view at best.»

The main point is not to deviate from our religion and adapt bad things but to follow the good things, of not only one's own but other religions too.

But among Christians, there ought to be good reason to hope we can agree on the main points, if not in every detail, about what constitutes the good and how we should pursue happiness.

Nevertheless the main point, — the settlement in Malabar a considerable colony of Syrians - may well be true; and granted this, it is not unnatural that there should have been a difference of practice among the settlers in the matter of inter-marriage with Indians, leading to a permanent social distinction.

As we have seen, the term parable traditionally referred to a fictitious story whose main point was the attitude it suggested (e.g. the Parable of the Good Samaritan).

The main point of this essay is that this theory — though it could well be wrong — is intelligible.

I think your main point that I agree with is that that God never leaves us, as a good parent never leaves a rebellious child.

I agree as well that the offer of eternal life is the main point, and you can get right to the point without spending too much time on sin.

A lot of the sweeter recipes have rolled oats in them, which is no surprise really considering they are Scottish but I like oats so that's always a good starting point, picking a recipe where the main ingredient is appealing.

Camelina oil main characteristics include high Omega 3 (35 %), balanced Omega 3 / 6/9 (35 % / 20 % / 35 %), high antioxidant content (including vitamin E and polyphenols) as well as excellent oxidation stability and smoke point (> 231 ºC).

Packing light enough to carry on is usually my main challenge, but I want to get to the point where I can manage this as well!

Obviously one of the main points of this is to adopt (even) more of a plant - based diet, so I don't plan to exist on Pot Noodles and Pringles, but it's good to know I could grab a Bournville from the garage if the urge for chocolate takes over (UPDATE: I actually checked my local garage yesterday and they don't even sell it... WTF Nightingales?

Well i would suppose he is tapping up, but is if arsenal is going to sell to Bayern, i think not, My point is if sanchez wants to leave let him leave, to keep him would do more harm than good and for me although many blame the manager, i feel one the main reason we got into a slump last season was Alex and Ozil, their negativity affected the performance of the weak minded players in our squad.

Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil are the two main talking points, with the club's best players having entered the final two years of their current contracts.

For me the main point is, we have a good squad number wise, but very short of quality outside 13 - 14 players.

Although Arsenal responded well to a poor first half to get a deserved equalising goal through Theo Walcott, I think the main reason we came away from Old Trafford with a point was that we only conceded once while Man United were all over us, so I am giving the Man of the Match to Laurent Koscielny who just shaded Mertesacker.

So back to main point: should we get forward players who can covert better and take out a defender or two?

Arsenal can go second in the Premier League table, which would be good for the Gunners of course, because yesterday was one of those strange days when nothing went as planned or as the form guide would lead us to believe, with every single one of our main rivals for the title dropping points, or those who played anyway.

Olivier Giroud is another point in fact, he misses far more than he scores and while I am impressed with his hold up play he is NOT fast enough or sharp enough to deliver the good that a sole striker or main tip of the spear should do.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

The main point about the above is that everyone is talking about kane and vardy, but it shows who the best striker is, and no surprise it is Aguero.

if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long

The three points were absolutely vital as well, because our main rivals for the Champions League group PSG pulled off their own Houdini style escape act with an injury time winner in Basel.

But on your main point about him» lacking fight and ambition», well said.

I do not just mean that we now have a four point lead over one of our main title rivals, although any extra gap is good as I do expect Pep Guardiola's talented team to bounce back.

People say Wenger can not get a big name player but he got Alexis and Ozil while talking Cech into swapping the blue for the red and white, Xhaka has pointed to Wenger as the main reason he joined us as well.