There was a construction site located at 370 N. Desplaines St..
The main defendant in the case was the general contractor on the construction project.
Not exact matches
The
main reason McLean County was cited
in the report was primarily due to Judge Paul Lawrence's decision to compel the president of the Illinois Manufacturers Association to testify
in a
case that had nothing to do with the association and another
case in which Lawrence and another local judge forced one company to appear as a
defendant in two different trials at the same time.
In civil court
cases, the
main focus of the plaintiff is usually some specific remedy like receiving money from the
defendant, or the receipt of a court order.
««Lone Wolfing»: Judge Kozinski Disagrees With Everyone
Main «Change of Appearance» Instruction Upheld
in Case of
Defendant Wearing Eyeglasses to Court»
««Change of Appearance» Instruction Upheld
in Case of
Defendant Wearing Eyeglasses to Court
Main Wednesday's Three Burning Legal Questions»
«Blaming the
Defendant, Even When the Penalty Is Death
Main Jones Day Wins Round
in Blockshopper
Case»
In this
case, the
main risk was that the
defendants might be able to prove at trial that they did nothing wrong.
«Iranian Dairy
Case a «Caricature» of U.S. Litigation System, Judges Find
Main In 1997 Strangling
Case, Evidence of
Defendant's Drug Addiction On Trial»
[17]
In his written material contained in the Defendants» motion record, Mr. Fancy argues that I ought to recuse myself from continuing to be the case management judge because of bias and he cites three main reasons: that my decision on the applications was wrong; that I failed to deal with the fact that MS has launched both applications and claims for the same relief; and that when I was a lawyer more than ten years ago, I was connected with a crime, specifically, a break and enter involving Mr. Fancy's clien
In his written material contained
in the Defendants» motion record, Mr. Fancy argues that I ought to recuse myself from continuing to be the case management judge because of bias and he cites three main reasons: that my decision on the applications was wrong; that I failed to deal with the fact that MS has launched both applications and claims for the same relief; and that when I was a lawyer more than ten years ago, I was connected with a crime, specifically, a break and enter involving Mr. Fancy's clien
in the
Defendants» motion record, Mr. Fancy argues that I ought to recuse myself from continuing to be the
case management judge because of bias and he cites three
main reasons: that my decision on the applications was wrong; that I failed to deal with the fact that MS has launched both applications and claims for the same relief; and that when I was a lawyer more than ten years ago, I was connected with a crime, specifically, a break and enter involving Mr. Fancy's client.
From a practical perspective the four
main difficulties are that (1) people convicted of crimes often lack the income or assets to pay judgments, (2) there are double recovery issues involved
in reconciling restitution awards
in a criminal
case (where the measure of damages is narrower) and damage awards
in a civil
case (where the measure of damages is broader), (3) there are priority issues involved
in reconciling criminal awards for fines, restitution and costs,
in each
case with civil awards for damages, and (4) if the
defendant declares bankruptcy, the non-dischargeability of the civil judgment must be affirmatively raised and proved (often this is elementary but there are strict time limits)
in the bankruptcy proceeding.