«The good news is that
the main effect of carbon dioxide on the ecology of the planet has nothing to do with climate.
Not exact matches
Algae absorb the
main greenhouse gas
carbon dioxide as they grow, so the net
effect on global warming
of the fuel is considered to be neutral.
Take a ride through the atmosphere to learn about greenhouse gases like
carbon dioxide, the
main driver
of climate change, and the greenhouse
effect.
A paper published back in 1998 and co-authored by Richard Tol and titled: A BAYESIAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
OF THE ENHANCED GREENHOUSE EFFECT dealt with climate sensitivity, even though the main purpose of the paper was to demonstrate: «This paper demonstrates that there is a robust statistical relationship between the records of the global mean surface air temperature and the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide over the period 1870 — 1991.&raqu
OF THE ENHANCED GREENHOUSE
EFFECT dealt with climate sensitivity, even though the
main purpose
of the paper was to demonstrate: «This paper demonstrates that there is a robust statistical relationship between the records of the global mean surface air temperature and the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide over the period 1870 — 1991.&raqu
of the paper was to demonstrate: «This paper demonstrates that there is a robust statistical relationship between the records
of the global mean surface air temperature and the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide over the period 1870 — 1991.&raqu
of the global mean surface air temperature and the atmospheric concentration
of carbon dioxide over the period 1870 — 1991.&raqu
of carbon dioxide over the period 1870 — 1991.»
The
main evidence for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), the principal alleged adverse
effect of human emissions
of carbon dioxide (CO2), is climate models built by CAGW supporters in a field where models with real predictive power do not exist and can not be built with any demonstrable accuracy beyond a week or two because climate and weather are coupled non-linear chaotic systems.
E.g., research assumes greenhouse gas emissions cause warming without explicitly stating humans are the cause»...
carbon sequestration in soil is important for mitigating global climate change» (4a) No position Does not address or mention the cause
of global warming (4b) Uncertain Expresses position that human's role on recent global warming is uncertain / undefined «While the extent
of human - induced global warming is inconclusive...» (5) Implicit rejection Implies humans have had a minimal impact on global warming without saying so explicitly E.g., proposing a natural mechanism is the
main cause
of global warming»... anywhere from a major portion to all
of the warming
of the 20th century could plausibly result from natural causes according to these results» (6) Explicit rejection without quantification Explicitly minimizes or rejects that humans are causing global warming»... the global temperature record provides little support for the catastrophic view
of the greenhouse
effect» (7) Explicit rejection with quantification Explicitly states that humans are causing less than half
of global warming «The human contribution to the CO2 content in the atmosphere and the increase in temperature is negligible in comparison with other sources
of carbon dioxide emission»»
A record wildfire year — such as 2015 which was the worst in Alaska for a decade — had a measurable
effect on the release
of carbon dioxide and methane, which are the
main drivers
of climate change.
The release
of carbon dioxide from the combustion
of oil, gas and coal is the
main cause
of the greenhouse
effect, i.e. the global warming and changes in weather patterns experienced over the last decades.
The
main evidence for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), the principal alleged adverse
effect of human emissions
of carbon dioxide (CO2), is climate models built -LSB-...]