Sentences with phrase «main issues in dispute»

The agreement contained the following termination clause, which was the main issue in the dispute:

Not exact matches

The 80 minutes of occasionally spirited argument at the high court this morning focused on the two main issues in the greenhouse gas litigation: For the case to go forward, the plaintiffs must prove that the case has legal standing (they must show that the court is the right venue for resolving this dispute), and that the common law definition of nuisance can support suits over greenhouse gases.

Most of the issues you mention are secondary to the main points of (former) dispute covered in the post, namely the reality and human causation of global warming.

Secondly, as to the substantive assessment of the dispute, the main issue in this case was the question of whether the applicable market sharing arrangement constituted a restriction of competition by object.

32 It is apparent from the wording of the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the order for reference that the issue at the heart of the dispute in the main proceedings concerns a procedure for the adoption of an interim measure governed by the rule of jurisdiction set out in Article 31 of Regulation No 44/2001.

In any dispute, your main concern will be to resolve the issue quickly, with the best possible outcome and at reasonable cost.

In the case at issue the request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main) in 2016 in the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodIn the case at issue the request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main) in 2016 in the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin 2016 in the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goods.

In both Marques v. Raulino and McCall v. Res, the courts addressed a number of main issues between the parties, but each touched briefly on what is nonetheless an important question: The extent to which a Parenting Coordinator is entitled to resolve disputes about legal custody, mobility, parenting schedules, or anything other than minor or temporary issues.

30 In those circumstances, it appears that the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings is dependent on knowing whether a Member State may refuse to grant the compensatory supplement to nationals of other Member States on the grounds that — like Mr Brey — they do not, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of that Member State for a period of longer than three months, since, in order to obtain that right, the person concerned must have sufficient resources not to apply for, inter alia, the compensatory supplemenIn those circumstances, it appears that the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings is dependent on knowing whether a Member State may refuse to grant the compensatory supplement to nationals of other Member States on the grounds that — like Mr Brey — they do not, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of that Member State for a period of longer than three months, since, in order to obtain that right, the person concerned must have sufficient resources not to apply for, inter alia, the compensatory supplemenin the main proceedings is dependent on knowing whether a Member State may refuse to grant the compensatory supplement to nationals of other Member States on the grounds that — like Mr Brey — they do not, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of that Member State for a period of longer than three months, since, in order to obtain that right, the person concerned must have sufficient resources not to apply for, inter alia, the compensatory supplemenin order to obtain that right, the person concerned must have sufficient resources not to apply for, inter alia, the compensatory supplement.

36 Moreover, it is not disputed that there are only minor differences in the wording of the legislation in force on 31 December 1993 and that applicable during the 2001 and 2002 tax years at issue in the main proceedings, which do not in any way affect the inherent logic of the legal provisions that have formed part of the legal order of the Member State concerned continuously since 31 December 1993.

The father submits that he had been successful on the main parenting issues in disputes, that the mother had taken an unreasonable position on costs, and that her actions amounted to bad faith.

«It used to be that procuring cause was the main issue in commercial commission disputes.