Sentences with phrase «main point of my comment»

To spell it out, the main point of my comment was

Without this context, she missed the main point of my comment and misrepresented the spirit in which it was made.»

Care to address the main point of my comment Patrick?

The main point of my comments on the $ 36T plan was that, while it would maintain lifestyle, it would not avoid the climate Apocalypse.

Not exact matches

Their point though is that the main stream media is attacking MK and her comments about Santa because of an article in the Post praising MK, that the main stream media wants to discredit her and Fox.

Patriarchae, my point is that Pastor Jeffers» comments about Mormonism perfectly exemplifies the main problem with the hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of Protestant denominations (most of whom can not agree on the time of day much less matters theological).

It appears the main thrust of Eddie's comment yesterday has been completely bypassed, but her point remains valid.

While not the main point of your post, I can comment about adult meal prices.

Indeed, coconut oil was just a passing comment worthy of mention but not at all the main point of the paper.

Oh, and as a reader has already pointed out in the comment section of the main review, the «secret stowaway who quickly becomes the film's de facto villain» is prominently featured in the trailers (and on the one - sheet).

@gaterakos — Read my comment above:P, the main point of the Exynos 5 Octa (8 - Core) CPU is battery saving.

The main comments were that most of you want the original point - and - click Broken Sword experience, with death sequence, overworld maps, and of course a colourful cast of characters!

However, I think my main point stands (and its essence was better expressed in the inline to your original comment at # 31): the perturbations in Tietische aren't comparable to the decline of 2007.

But if that's your main issue with the book, I think you're spectacularly missing the point, and your comments here risk fundamentally misleading people who haven't read it yet about the nature of the work.

Comments that make a whole bunch of unrelated points will only have the first point posted in the main thread.

comment on Arno Arrak 8:26 am in truths n ° 2 and n ° 5 the main point is that a periodic waveform should not be approximated by a straight line, and that one should at least try a sum of sinusoid with as little free parameters as possible (in this case only the amplitude and phase of the 210 and 60 years sinusoids, as the Hadcrut series is too short for a Fourier or wavelet decomposition see as well the paper of Macias reference 18); the figure 15 - A shows the step wise changes of the temperature paced by the El Nino events: this has been shown in detail by Bob Tisdale.

A post at DeSmog blog — Climate Denier Tim Ball: Trump Approved, But Not Credible Enough to Stand Accountable For Libel — makes an interesting point that is the main focus of my comments:

I only note that most of the discussion (even a comment attributed to Gavin) seems to miss the main point.

I was pleased that you acknowledged that, as I had pointed out, the data on cat - 5 hurricanes shows no significant trend, an observation that was the main focus of my comments (at realClimate.org post # 212).

I do feel we are getting away from the main point of this thread which was to comment on Kates post.

The main point I'm trying to make in the comments you highlight is that as with most members of the public who try to take an interest in this subject I do not have access to the papers published in Nature or Science or anywhere else for that matter.

Plenty of comments and suggestions were made, I was able to accommodate most of them without toning down my main points.

My main point, which was also the initial point of my comment that you linked, is that the mechanism is reversible.

The main concern of supporters of the bill was the point raised by Ms Wrightman in the previous comment — one she and others repeated to the Standing Committee: that the bill will not apply to lawsuits begun before last December, when the bill had first reading.

It's not that therapists should ignore the main point of what's being presented, but that they should also notice and comment on other dimensions.

Following up on my main point within my original comments herein, it is what the public perceives regarding the professionalism of ORE's Ontario education system that counts, and not Realtors» opinions who are in search of speed and ease.