Sentences with phrase «main purpose of the article»

But, the main purpose of the article was to warn parents about the content of this game.

The main purpose of this article is to offer guidance when using any Bitcoin faucets, understanding the downsides and risks involved.

Not exact matches

First, it can be used for practical purposes;, also there is a theoretical part, which is about fundamentally better understanding these phenomena,» said Tibor Durgonics who is a Ph.D. student at DTU Space and the main author of the new article in Radio Science.

The chief purpose of hiring university scientists now is to make more financial profits for their employer (see my early article in the Scientists category on «What's the New Main Job of Faculty Scientists Today?»)

In this section of the article we will go over some of the main ways that organizations help people communicate with each other for the purposes of finding someone to settle down with for life.

Main articles: Jewish view of marriage and shidduch Orthodox Jewish men and women usually meet through matchmakers in a process called a shidduch, for the purpose of marriage.

Once you've watched the videos and read the articles, you'll want to buy his book — which is the main purpose of this website.

It appears that the endless hairsplitting arguments have one main purpose: to draw attention away from the subject of the original article, which is that GISS massages and adjusts climate data, and then does everything possible to avoid publicly archiving its taxpayer - funded raw data.

[a] tax measure such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is, according to the referring court's description of its history and purpose, intended to prevent excessive capital flow towards the Netherlands Antilles and to counter the appeal of that OCT as a tax haven, comes under the tax carve - out clause cited above and remains, consequently, outside the scope of application of Article 47 (1) of the [Seventh] OCT Decision, provided it pursues that objective in an effective and proportionate manner, which is a matter for the referring court to assess.

It follows that, in so far as the benefit in question in the main proceedings fulfils the purpose set out in that article of the Charter, it can not be considered, under European Union law, as not being part of core benefits within the meaning of Article 11 (4) of Directive 20article of the Charter, it can not be considered, under European Union law, as not being part of core benefits within the meaning of Article 11 (4) of Directive 20Article 11 (4) of Directive 2003/109.

«which the contracting authority intends to use only for military purposes, can be considered to be intended specifically for such purposes, within the terms of Article 296 (1)(b) EC, only if it is established that, unlike the similar material intended for civilian uses invoked by the applicant in the main proceedings, that equipment, by virtue of its intrinsic characteristics, may be regarded as having been specially designed and developed, also as a result of substantial modifications, for such purposes» (para. 44).

Former Michigan State Representative Paul Opsommer was quoted in an article in the Lansing State Journal, however, as saying that writing traffic tickets was not the main purpose of the law against texting and driving.

As one suggestion of the referring court, AG Bobek also considers whether the place of establishment could be considered a relevant place for jurisdiction, taking inspiration from Article 3 (1) of the Insolvency Regulation, which refers to the «centre of main interests», i.e. the place where (for the purpose of that Regulation) a debtor conducts the administration of its interests (paras 105 - 108).

The AG suggested, in reference to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling, that the Court must declare that it has jurisdiction for the main reason that the HTSs should be regarded as acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union for the purposes of Article 267 of the Treaty on the functioning of the Union («TFEU»), which is the primary law basis of the cooperation between the CJEU and the national courts via the preliminary ruling system.

A New York Times article published two years ago suggested the main purpose of producing wearable devices such as Google's Project Glass and the new iWatch would be to sell more iPhones.