To realize that climate is driven
mainly by other factors than just some more parts per million of CO2 in the air is like shooting fish in a barrel.
Not exact matches
Its fluctuations are
mainly driven
by climatic
factors and must not be subject to major
other influences such as avalanches, calving or surge dynamics, heavy debris cover, artificial snow production or ablation protection.
I lean toward the view that the effect on temperature of the large increase in anthropogenic CO2 is small, barely if at all detectable using present methods, and likely to be overwhelmed
by a number of
other factors,
mainly natural.
The bottom line is that true bumps, dips, and flat times punctuate the climate record, and need not be spurious in order to understand them to be fluctuations around a longer term trend, which for the past 100 years has been upward, with the years since 1950 well explained
mainly by GHG - mediated forcing, plus a smaller contribution from
other factors.