Not exact matches
My only concern with climatedebatedaily is that no attempt is made to differentiate peer reviewed science from a wide range of
opinion pieces, leaving the reader with the impression that
mainstream science is far less resolved
on the
climate change issue than is actually the case.
Both Romm and advocacy organizations such as Media Matters for America raise their financial support and define their professional roles as watch dogging the
mainstream media, asserting that consistent false balance in
mainstream coverage at leading outlets such as the NY Times or the Washington Post remains a major barrier to political action
on climate change and that conservative media like Fox News have a powerful impact
on wider public
opinion.
«The first few people you quoted are not representative of the
mainstream scientific
opinion on this point and again I will be happy to submit for the record recent articles from Nature, Nature Geoscience, Nature
Climate Change, Science and others showing that in drought prone regions..»