The Conservative manifesto pledged to
maintain per pupil funding across the lifetime of the next government.
The Spending Review admits as much as it only plans to
maintain per pupil funding in cash terms.
Not exact matches
In opposing the amendment, Department for Education spokesperson Baroness Garden of Frognal said, «At present, any
maintained faith school is able to select up to 100
per cent of its
pupils based on faith, subject to being oversubscribed... We want to ensure parity across faith schools in the
maintained and academy sector... The noble Baroness's amendment would remove that flexibility for voluntary controlled schools that have converted to become academies, fixing their admissions arrangements to those that existed on the point of conversion.
Figures show 55
per cent of
pupils in mixed schools achieved five good GCSEs including English and maths, while single - sex schools
maintained a higher proportion with 75
per cent of
pupils getting the same results.
As a result, MPS was no longer able to
maintain total revenues as it lost MPCP students, but could still
maintain per -
pupil revenues.
But MPS chose to
maintain total revenues, collecting $ 39.5 million more than would have been needed to
maintain the
per -
pupil amount.
However, vestiges of the original funding mechanism meant that Milwaukee property taxes had to go up just to
maintain per -
pupil revenues.
In this view, it would be justified to
maintain total revenues, despite falling enrollments, for a higher revenue
per pupil.
These higher property taxes no longer pay for the option of
maintaining total revenues as enrollments decline; instead, they are necessary to
maintain per -
pupil revenues.
Furthermore, 46
per cent of primary school respondents
maintained they would spend more time talking to individual
pupils or parents, if their workloads were reduced.
The figures found that the average local authority
maintained school had 55
per cent of
pupils achieving 5 + A * - C grades in GCSEs, while free schools had 50.5
per cent of
pupils achieving the same result.
Phoenix — The excellence movement notwithstanding, public schools will have to fight in the second half of the decade just to
maintain their current
per -
pupil spending levels, two leaders of the school - finance community asserted at a meeting here this month.
In addition to this, eight in 10 (80
per cent) of the secondary school leaders surveyed by The Key
maintain that the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) performance measure, in particular, is limiting opportunities for their
pupils with vocational or technical aptitude.
The figures outlined that 45
per cent of respondents claimed teachers are more likely to contribute financially towards providing classroom resources than previously, while 21
per cent
maintain funding cuts will lead to fewer activities available to
pupils.
However, it also
maintained that more than 60
per cent of secondary and 40
per cent of primary
pupils are failing to reach work - class standards on writing, literacy, maths and science.
49
per cent of staff
maintained that the summer break negatively impacted the
pupils» mental health.
«It will mean that the total schools budget will increase by # 2.6 bn between this year and 2019/20, and
per pupil funding will now be
maintained in real terms for the remaining two years of the spending review period to 2019/20,» Ms Greening said.
Examining data on more than 15,000 children born between 1955 and 1985, it found that poor children whose schools were estimated to receive and
maintain a 10 percent increase in
per -
pupil spending (adjusted for inflation) before they began their 12 years of public school were 10 percentage points more likely to complete high school than other poor children.
Ministers
maintain they have protected funding by ensuring the cash
per -
pupil it hands to schools remains static.
While the government has pledged to
maintain per -
pupil income, heads currently preparing next year's budgets are having to factor in rising costs such as increased pension and national insurance contributions.
In Islington, 5
per cent or more
pupils left five of the north London's council's eight
maintained schools in year 11, a similar figure in half of Waltham Forest council's ten schools in north London and three of Lewisham's ten schools in south London.
The report said: «Between 2014 and 2023,
pupil numbers in
maintained nursery and state - funded primary schools are projected to increase by nine
per cent.
Maintain current law stipulating no
per -
pupil adjustment in the 2015 - 16 school year and thereafter.
For black
pupils the fall was 5.7
per cent in
maintained schools compared with 4.3 in sponsored academies.
The five A * - C benchmark for Chinese
pupils at local authority
maintained (LA) schools fell 7.9
per cent, while the similar scores of Chinese
pupils in sponsored academies dipped just 0.1
per cent.
With multiple chartering authorities, local school districts can be adversely impacted as the
per -
pupil expenditures are re-allocated or deducted from operational revenue essential to
maintain already cash - strapped school district operations.
The government has always
maintained it has protected
per pupil funding.
ALEC's «Virtual Public Schools Act,» for example, even allows virtual schools to be paid the same amount
per pupil as traditional public schools even though operations like K12 have no bricks and mortar school house or desks or air - conditioning or gyms, etc., to
maintain.
Public pre-K programs providing salary parity
maintain higher spending
per pupil and higher quality standards, based on NIEER State of Preschool quality benchmarks, without sacrificing enrollment compared to states that pay pre-K teachers far less.
Although school funding was
maintained in real - terms
per pupil under the Coalition Government, all additional funding was provided via the Pupil Premium, targeted at particular pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other fun
pupil under the Coalition Government, all additional funding was provided via the
Pupil Premium, targeted at particular pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other fun
Pupil Premium, targeted at particular
pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use
Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other fun
Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other funding.
This would return
per -
pupil funding to 2011 - 2012 school year levels, and allow Principal Latterner to
maintain current staffing levels.