People with some training in electronics, computers, photography, auto mechanics or fabrication (machine tools and welding) prepare vehicles for testing, calibrate and install sensors, build test fixtures, calibrate and
maintain test dummies and film crash tests.
Not exact matches
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash
test indicates that the passenger's survival space was
maintained very well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash
test indicates that the passenger's survival space was
maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained very well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well in the Institute's
test.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space wasn't
maintained well.
The driver's space was
maintained well in both
tests, and risk of injuries to the
dummy's legs and feet was low.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained very well (Institute
test car shown).
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained very well (Institute
test vehicle shown).
Aside from the intruded door frame when the door hinges were sheared off in the second
test (shown), the
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash
test indicates that the passenger's survival space was
maintained very well (Institute
test car shown).
The passenger's space was
maintained well in both
tests, and risk of injuries to the
dummy's legs and feet was low.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the first crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash
test indicates that the passenger's survival space was
maintained well.
The passenger's space was
maintained reasonably well in both
tests, and risk of injuries to the
dummy's legs and feet was low.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the second crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash
test indicates that the passenger's survival space was
maintained well (Institute
test car shown).
Despite some buckling of the A-pillar and roof rail, the
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well.
In the
test, which was conducted on an Equinox but applies to the Terrain as well, the driver space was well -
maintained, and the
dummy's movement was well - controlled.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates the driver's upper survival space was
maintained well, but there was more footwell intrusion than is desirable.
The driver's survival space was
maintained well, as indicated by the
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the second crash
test.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained extremely well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates the driver's survival space wasn't
maintained well (second
test with front and side curtain airbag deployment).
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test, together with the footwell intrusion, indicates that the driver's survival space wasn't
maintained well (first
test shown).
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel indicates that the driver's survival space was not
maintained well (second
test without side airbag deployment).
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the second crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well (intrusion pattern in first
test appeared very similar).
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after both crash
tests indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained well (second
test shown).
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test, together with the footwell intrusion, indicate that the driver space wasn't
maintained well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver space was
maintained reasonably well.
In addition, IIHS stated the driver space was well -
maintained, and the
dummy's movement was well - controlled during the
test.
When
test dummies fitted with sensors were strapped into seating systems designed for three year old and one and a half year old children, reassuringly at the moment of impact these «children» were all registered as
maintaining stable positions with minimal head movements.
Dummy movement during the tests was well - controlled, and both cars had only minimal intrusion into the occupant compartment, so survival space for the dummy was well - mainta
Dummy movement during the
tests was well - controlled, and both cars had only minimal intrusion into the occupant compartment, so survival space for the
dummy was well - mainta
dummy was well -
maintained.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well.
The driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well, as indicated by the
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the third crash
test.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the first crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained well.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained well, despite some buckling of the A-pillar.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash
test indicates that the passenger's survival space was not
maintained well.
When the Institute
tested a 1999 model, the driver's survival space wasn't
maintained very well, the steering wheel moved up toward the driver, and a high head acceleration occurred when the
dummy's head hit the pillar behind the driver seat.
The
dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained reasonably well in the second
test.
The driver's survival space was
maintained well, as indicated by the
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the third crash
test.
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after all three crash
tests indicates that the driver's survival space was
maintained well (third
test shown).
The
dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash
test indicates the driver's survival space was
maintained well.