Usually the court will issue a temporary order that
maintains the status quo during the case.
From the Hartford Courant: Frustrated plaintiffs in the Sheff v. O'Neill lawsuit accepted a new agreement Friday to continue desegregation efforts in Hartford, asking a judge to approve a one - year extension that does little more than
maintain the status quo during the state's fiscal troubles.
It is clear that section 59 of the Code exists not only to
maintain the status quo during the negotiation of a collective agreement, but also to facilitate certification and ensure that the parties bargain in good faith.
Usually the court will issue a temporary order that
maintains the status quo during the case.
Not exact matches
If they do
maintain the
status quo, mortgage rates would be less likely to rise significantly
during the last quarter of 2015.
Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of
maintaining the
status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced
during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting
It is divided into two areas: the sympathetic system, which is responsible for generating changes
during a fight or flight situation (such changes include increased circulation to muscles, increased heart rate, pupil dilation etc.) and the parasympathetic nervous system, which is responsible for
maintaining the body's
status quo.
Temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions can be issued to
maintain the
status quo and avoid «irreparable harm» that could result
during the time it takes to resolve a lawsuit.
Applying the common - law «interest stops rule» normally applied in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act proceedings, Justice Newbould ruled that post-filing interest was not payable on the Crossover Bonds.5 Justice Newbould began his reasons with reference to the «fundamental tenet of insolvency law that all debts shall be pari passu and all unsecured creditors [shall] receive equal treatment».6 Justice Newbould found that the
status quo with respect to unsecured creditors should be
maintained as at the date of Nortel's filing and that to permit certain claims to grow disproportionately to others
during the CCAA stay period would violate the
status quo.
During the negotiations, the parties
maintain the
status quo in regards to the children and no unilateral changes are made to assets, insurance coverage or other matters without consent.
Three primary considerations under the best interests of the child test that the courts often consider are preserving the
status quo in the interests of
maintaining some stability for the child, whether one parent acted as the primary caregiver
during the relationship, and the importance of keeping siblings together when considering future housing arrangements.
If they do
maintain the
status quo, mortgage rates would be less likely to rise significantly
during the last quarter of 2015.