Aisling represents clients in all phases of complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes before
major arbitral institutions, including the ICC, SCC, LCIA, SIAC and HKIAC.
In international investment treaty and commercial arbitrations in virtually every country in Central and South America under
all major arbitral rules and institutions, including among others International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («ICDR»);
He specializes in international commercial and investment arbitration, and has represented clients under most
major arbitral rules systems.
Perkins Coie represents clients in ad hoc international arbitrations as well as those conducted under the rules of
every major arbitral institution, including investor - state arbitrations under the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes.
We have extensive experience acting as counsel in international commercial and investment treaty arbitrations under
all major arbitral rules, seated in Australia and around the world.
He has acted as counsel in numerous commercial and construction arbitrations in the UAE and internationally, both ad hoc and under the rules of
the major arbitral institutions, including the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), DIFC - LCIA, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and UNCITRAL.
He advises on and acts as counsel in arbitrations under the rules of
the major arbitral institutions with a particular focus on energy, telecoms, joint venture, shareholder and other investment disputes in Southeast Asia.
She has acted as counsel as well as secretary to the tribunal in ad - hoc arbitrations and before
major arbitral institutions (including ICC, DIS, VIAC, NAI, CAS), at multiple seats and governed by a variety of substantive and procedural laws.
We have served as arbitrators or counsel in over 500 cases under the rules of
all major arbitral institutions, such as the ICC, LCIA, AAA / ICDR, SCC, CAM, CRCICA, NAI, DIAC, SIAC, Swiss Chambers and ICSID, as well as in UNCITRAL and ad hoc arbitrations.
Based in London, Paula specialises in international arbitration and has helped clients in many jurisdictions, including Africa, Asia, Australia, Canada, France, Russia and the CIS, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA in ad hoc arbitration and proceedings under the auspices of all
the major arbitral institutions.
Recognized by the Chambers guides as «a crucial figure in the firm's global arbitration practice,» Mr. Pierce represents clients in international arbitration matters in venues around the world, under both civil and common law regimes, and under the rules of
all major arbitral institutions.
Anton is well acquainted with
the major arbitral rules, including LCIA, ICC and UNCITRAL.
He has also represented clients in many of
the major arbitral centres of the world and is familiar with the arbitration rules of all the leading arbitration institutions.
He represents clients in international arbitrations under the rules of
all major arbitral institutions, with a particular focus on disputes in the oil and gas, power, construction, financial services and telecommunications sectors.
Finally, many of our lawyers hold or have held leadership positions in the world's
major arbitral institutions.
Russell has handled scores of international arbitrations in the United States, the EU and Latin America before each of
the major arbitral institutions, including the LCIA, ICC, ICSID, ICDR, and AAA.
Not exact matches
In addition to having been instructed in
major arbitrations, such as the Bermudan - based arbitration relating to the reinsurance of Arthur Andersen following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom, and Elektrim SA's long running dispute with Vivendi Universal over Polish telecommunications, he has particular expertise in relation to inter relief applications to the Court in relation to heavy arbitrations such as ETI Euro Telecom V Republic of Bolivia [2008](no pre-emptive relief in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 693 (s. 68 of AA 1996 and awards obtained by fraud); Elektrim v Vivendi [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8 (injunction to restrain arbitration continuing) Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd (multi-billion dollar shareholder dispute — interim injunction under s. 44 of the AA 1996); Steadfast v Baker Hughes (s. 9 (3) step in the action preventing a stay in favour of arbitration) and enforcement of
arbitral awards (Yukos v Rosneft: US$ 500m and Yukos v Russian Federation US$ 50 billion.
With litigation being a
major forte, TianTong also renders professional service relating to arbitration, enforcement of judgement or
arbitral awards and providing Chinese law expert opinions in foreign - related litigation and arbitration proceedings.
Multiple successful representations of
major US and foreign companies in international commercial arbitrations before the ICC and other
arbitral institutions.
This power, known as the principle of «Kompetenz - Kompetenz» in German or «la compétence de la compétence» in French, is part, and indeed a
major part, of the incidental or inherent jurisdiction of any judicial or
arbitral tribunal, consisting of its «jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction.»
The question facing officials now is if they wish to focus on minor reforms to
arbitral appointment procedures (perhaps limiting the number of times a law firm can appoint the same arbitrator), on
major reforms to
arbitral appointment procedures (perhaps getting rid of party appointment), or on designing a procedure for fixed - term appointments.
In 2014, it had the largest number of filings among the
major international
arbitral providers.
As Arbitrator, he sat in over 80
major international cases, including appointments as President and Co-Arbitrator in numerous ICSID, NAFTA and ad hoc investor - State disputes and institutional and ad hoc commercial arbitration cases worldwide (including ICC; LCIA; Stockholm Chamber of Commerce; Netherlands Arbitration Institute; International
Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; ARIAS; CCIG (Swiss Rules); UNCITRAL).
A recent highlight saw the team act for an individual in a
major case that successfully challenged an
arbitral award arising from a divorce dispute.
Historically, the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) was the only
major institution to provide reasoned decisions on arbitrator challenges, but in recent years other
arbitral institutions have followed suit.
The revision introduces
major changes to the existing
arbitral procedure under the DIS Rules and is the result of an extensive consultation process which lasted for almost two years.
They are before all of the
major arbitration bodies, as well as ad hoc
arbitral tribunals.
Moreover, many of the
major institutional
arbitral rules (including the LCIA and ICC rules) have the effect of excluding the application of section 69.
Prior to joining Three Crowns, Philipp clerked at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, the Netherlands, where he assisted
arbitral tribunals on
major investor - and inter-State disputes, including arbitrations relating to natural resources, maritime and land boundaries, infrastructure, and the law of the sea.