And the only way we're going to achieve large global emissions cuts is if
major emitters like the USA and Australia lead the way in reducing their emissions.
Second,
major emitters like the United States and China are now closely cooperating in implementing climate change solutions at home and finding ways to cooperate internationally.
«It is also critical that the U.S. show leadership in cutting emissions if we are to compel other
major emitters like China to do so,» Bledsoe said.
Not exact matches
Those three groups formed a key alliance during the Durban conference that forced the United States and
major emerging economies
like India and China to commit to negotiating a future broad climate deal that binds all big
emitters to cut carbon.
In the last two rounds of annual climate talks, in Copenhagen, Denmark, and Cancún, Mexico, more than 80 countries — including
major emitters not bound by the Kyoto protocol
like Brazil, China, Indonesia and the US — pledged voluntary targets.
Up until recently, historic greenhouse gas
emitters like the U.S. were unwilling to budge on climate negotiations until other countries particularly China, who are now
major greenhouse gas
emitters, reduced emissions as well.
The United States» Congress won't pass domestic legislation without key developing countries
like China, which is now a
major greenhouse gas
emitter signing on to reduction commitments; and China sees themselves as a developing country that has acted progressively and responsibly to address climate change when it technically has no obligation to do so under the UNFCCC.
Unfortunately, Australia's plan,
like Europe's, gave away far too much to
major emitters of CO2 and does far too little to reduce emissions, aiming for a 5 percent cut in carbon by 2020, with uncertainty as to how deep the cuts may be beyond then.
To resolve this question, leading environmental groups and
major U.S. corporations (including some of the biggest greenhouse gas
emitters)
like American Electric Power and Duke Energy convened a negotiating process through Avoided Deforestation Partners, while the Waxman - Markey legislation was being drafted.
National green leaders, who had spent the previous year insisting that progress toward capping U.S. carbon emissions would ensure the successful conclusion of a global emissions - reduction agreement in Copenhagen, pretended
like they'd never suggested that the United Nation's climate change conference could ever achieve such an outcome and praised Obama for ditching the United Nations and striking out to reach an agreement — any agreement — among
major emitters.
Washington state,
like the entire West Coast, is a leader on forward - thinking climate policy with legislative targets for emission reductions, a greenhouse gas inventory of
major emitters, and a Clean Air Rule adopted by the Inslee Administration.
A last example is that the Agreement requires industrialised nations
like the United States to provide significant financial support to developing countries, many of which rank among the world's
major emitters of carbon dioxide.