Sentences with phrase «major global climate models»

and «this oxidation pathway — which is currently included in only one of the 12 major global climate models — will have a significant impact...» Any idea if that's «significant at the five percent level» or significant as in oh wow?

There are 22 major global climate models and many more regional ones that submit their data to the IPCC.

Therefore, this oxidation pathway — which is currently included in only one of the 12 major global climate models — will have a significant impact on assessments of current and future climate.

So it is not surprising that while the inure than a dozen major global climate models in use around the world tend to agree on the broadest phenomena, they differ wildly when it comes to regional effects.

Not exact matches

The model has already been integrated into the next generation of the global land model used for climate simulations by the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, a major national climate modeling center.

Previous studies based on global climate models indicated that the overturning circulation in the North Pacific and North Atlantic responded in opposite ways to major shifts in global climate.

The major carbon producers data can be applied to climate models to derive the carbon input's effect on climate change impacts including global average temperature, sea level rise, and extreme events such as heat waves.

Within the integrated Earth system science paradigm, our major research thrusts include the physics and chemistry of aerosols, clouds and precipitation; integrating our understanding of climate, energy, and other human and natural systems through the development and application of models that span a wide range of spatial scales; and determining the impacts of and informing responses to climate and other global and regional environmental changes.

All major climate models agree that the clearest symptom of climate change would be a global warming.

15 years later, those advocating major governmental policy based on global climate model predictions.wish the models had not exaggerated the future warming so greatly.

Global Climate Models are children's toys in comparison to the actual underlying complexity, especially when (as noted) the major drivers setting the baseline behavior are not well understood or quantitatively available.

Could unrecognized systemic bias from excluded or unrecognized physics be causing the major disconnect between observations of climate sensitivity and projections from global climate models?

The study confirms previous similar evaluations and raises concern for the ability of current climate models to simulate the response of a major mode of global circulation variability to external forcings.

The IPCC's climate modelers purposefully designed the computer models to implicate human CO2 emissions as the major culprit for global warming and climate change.

«The authors write that «the notorious tropical bias problem in climate simulations of global coupled general circulation models manifests itself particularly strongly in the tropical Atlantic,»... they state that «the climate bias problem is still so severe that one of the most basic features of the equatorial Atlantic Ocean — the eastward shoaling thermocline — can not be reproduced by most of the IPCC assessment report models,... as they describe it, «show that the bias in the eastern equatorial Atlantic has a major effect on sea - surface temperature (SST) response to a rapid change in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).»

Please reevaluate and update us on the accuracy and significance of global warming models in light of this evidence and the need for very high significance in climate science to justify major changes in public policy.

An analysis of the major economic climate models shows that the global benefits of temperature rises of up to 3 F to 4 F outweigh the costs.

The IPCC and the world's major climate agencies» CO2 - centric climate models have failed abysmally at global temperature predictions, per the actual scientific evidence... (Ramez Naam denies this)

Here seven GVMs are used to investigate possible responses of global natural terrestrial vegetation to a major new set of future climate and atmospheric CO2 projections generated as part of the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)(6), the primary climate modeling contribution to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asseclimate and atmospheric CO2 projections generated as part of the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)(6), the primary climate modeling contribution to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asseclimate modeling contribution to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asseClimate Change assessment.

Anyway, do you agree that there is a major difference between the «simple physics» versions («CO2 acts like a giant blanket») and the more sophisticated radiative physics - based models used in the global climate models (for instance)?

The world's climate is way too complex... with way too many significant global and regional variables (e.g., solar, volcanic and geologic activity, variations in the strength and path of the jet stream and major ocean currents, the seasons created by the tilt of the earth, and the concentration of water vapor in the atmosphere, which by the way is many times more effective at holding heat near the surface of the earth than is carbon dioxide, a non-toxic, trace gas that all plant life must have to survive, and that produce the oxygen that WE need to survive) to consider for any so - called climate model to generate a reliable and reproducible predictive model.

The major carbon producers data can be applied to climate models to derive the carbon input's effect on climate change impacts including global average temperature, sea level rise, and extreme events such as heat waves.

«Reducing the wide range of uncertainty inherent in current model predictions of global climate change will require major advances in understanding and modeling of both (1) the factors that determine atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols, and (2) the so - called «feedbacks» that determine the sensitivity of the climate system to a prescribed increase in greenhouse gases.»

Inadequacies of modeling the Hadley Cell, a major mechanism in producing global weather and climate, are enough to invalidate the models and cause the failed predictions.

Its role is a major factor in global weather and climate yet is completely inadequately covered in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) computer climate yet is completely inadequately covered in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) computer Climate Change (IPCC) computer models.

«Climate sensitivity is a metric used to characterise the response of the global climate system to a given forcing» and «'' Spread in model climate sensitivity is a major factor contributing to the range in projections of future climate changes» both suggest to me that CS is anClimate sensitivity is a metric used to characterise the response of the global climate system to a given forcing» and «'' Spread in model climate sensitivity is a major factor contributing to the range in projections of future climate changes» both suggest to me that CS is anclimate system to a given forcing» and «'' Spread in model climate sensitivity is a major factor contributing to the range in projections of future climate changes» both suggest to me that CS is anclimate sensitivity is a major factor contributing to the range in projections of future climate changes» both suggest to me that CS is anclimate changes» both suggest to me that CS is an input.

The ENA is providing a rare, long - term data set about the response of these low clouds to changes in atmospheric greenhouse gases and aerosols — a major source of uncertainty in global and regional climate models.

As a result, the very different land - use histories produced by different models of Holocene land - use change (Figs. 1 and 2) have major implications in understanding the emergence of humans as a global - scale force transforming climate — a key indicator of Earth system transformation and the emergence of the Anthropocene (9 ⇓ — 11).