Sentences with phrase «major international disputes»

PetroKazakhstan's major international disputes across the full value chain with Lukoil, permitting a takeover by CNPC for $ 4.2 Bn.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

To call out workers on «essential services» for a national strike without any major trade dispute with their direct employers will be tantamount to blatant violation of our extant labour laws and international labour standards.

One of the major trends in complex business litigation is the increasingly international nature of disputes.

Stewart advises contractors and owners on major construction and energy projects, specialising in international dispute resolution work.

Given his past construction law experience in private practice, Arjun Agarwal tasked with managing the majority of Chevron's construction disputes and international arbitrations on Chevron's major capital projects outside of North America.

This development was a dramatic and major step forward for international commercial dispute resolution.

He represents clients in international arbitrations under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, with a particular focus on disputes in the oil and gas, power, construction, financial services and telecommunications sectors.

We are instructed in a huge range of cases, ranging from major international litigation to domestic contractual and property disputes of all kinds.

Roger Gibson has been appointed as a Planning & Programming Expert on numerous disputes up to more than # 100M in value and has extensive experience working for national & international contractors in the programming and planning of major building, civil engineering and process engineering projects.

First, a demand for disconnection clauses (e.g. Art. 282 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) contradicts the general praxis of international agreements to create an exception for the major part of parties excluding them from the dispute settlement procedure without opening this possibility for the other parties to the agreement (see also AG view para 115 - 6).

I would require all barristers, before starting at the independent Bar, to spend at least one year in the litigation department of a firm of solicitors, or even an international law firm with a major dispute resolution practice.

In 2002, Chris joined the office of a major international accounting firm in Hong Kong, where he was involved in the formation and leadership of its fraud investigation and dispute services team throughout China and the Asia Pacific Region.

acting (with Graham Dunning QC) in a dispute between publicly listed international oil companies relating to a major offshore development project (ICC);

She has recently worked in senior legal and dispute management roles for a major international oil and gas producer and for a global energy company.

«In this respect, major mining companies have threatened to bring proceedings over the New Mining Code before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).»

James Carter Qualified: 2002 Made partner: 2015 Career highlights: Acting on behalf of a number of major international energy businesses including Shell, Trafigura, Hess Corporation and Turkish Petroleum; a $ 135m cross-border dispute between a British bank and a European state.

Melissa has acted for major international corporations and banks in commercial, corporate, real estate, finance and energy & resources (including commodity pricing) disputes.

He was a partner in a major international law firm, serving as managing partner of the firm's London office disputes department from 1990 to 2000.

As Arbitrator, he sat in over 80 major international cases, including appointments as President and Co-Arbitrator in numerous ICSID, NAFTA and ad hoc investor - State disputes and institutional and ad hoc commercial arbitration cases worldwide (including ICC; LCIA; Stockholm Chamber of Commerce; Netherlands Arbitration Institute; International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; ARIAS; CCIG (Swiss Rulesinternational cases, including appointments as President and Co-Arbitrator in numerous ICSID, NAFTA and ad hoc investor - State disputes and institutional and ad hoc commercial arbitration cases worldwide (including ICC; LCIA; Stockholm Chamber of Commerce; Netherlands Arbitration Institute; International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; ARIAS; CCIG (Swiss RulesInternational Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; ARIAS; CCIG (Swiss Rules); UNCITRAL).

He is currently acting for several of the major international banks and financial services firms in derivatives disputes.

We have extensive experience in complex cross-jurisdictional disputes and our lawyers have represented clients in arbitrations under all the major international rules (ICC, LMAA, LCIA, UNCITRAL, SIAC, CIETAC and HIAC), as well as before commodity trade tribunals (including LME, GAFTA and FOSFA).

Oliver's experience includes: defending global investment banks in High Court proceedings brought in relation to complex financial products and transactions; acting for an international consulting firm in High Court proceedings brought by the trustees of a pension scheme; acting for a UK financial services provider in relation to a major loss of customer data; acting for an insurer in arbitration proceedings relating to an insurance coverage dispute; acting for a global custody bank on an investigation in relation to client overcharging on asset portfolio transitions; and acting for a UK financial services group in relation to legal and regulatory issues arising from a major misstatement in its published accounts.

Major international companies and financial institutions regularly turn to us to handle a range of global regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, arbitrations, internal investigations, commercial disputes, and civil and criminal court proceedings.

With over 10 years of experience as counsel in a large number of major projects unfolded on the Romanian market, Alina Popescu has gained solid expertise in M&A and FDI matters, commercial & contract law, international arbitration and amicable settlement of high value disputes.

a major Russian oil drilling company in cross-border international litigation in connection with a corporate dispute and the challenge of the world - wide freezing order

In addition to his commercial arbitration practice, Mr. Caher has also represented a major international construction company in a series of complex and high profile construction litigation disputes before the English High Court and Court of Appeal, and represented the Sudan People's Liberation Movement / Army (SPLM / A) in the public international law Abyei Arbitration.

Norton Rose Fulbright combines several decades of international arbitration experience with a commercial approach to offer its clients across all major industry sectors the very best chance of determining their disputes promptly, efficiently and cost - effectively.

He has acted as counsel in numerous commercial and construction arbitrations in the UAE and internationally, both ad hoc and under the rules of the major arbitral institutions, including the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), DIFC - LCIA, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and UNCITRAL.

Major international arbitration of a contract dispute on behalf of a Mexican engineering and construction corporation involving the engineering, procurement and construction of a nitrogen production plant in Mexico.

He has a wide expertise in all kind of Civil and Commercial Disputes between national and international major companies before either ordinary Courts or Arbitration Courts, including, amongst others, contractual liability, disputes between shareholders, directors liability, stock markets, unfair competition, private equity issues and construction agrDisputes between national and international major companies before either ordinary Courts or Arbitration Courts, including, amongst others, contractual liability, disputes between shareholders, directors liability, stock markets, unfair competition, private equity issues and construction agrdisputes between shareholders, directors liability, stock markets, unfair competition, private equity issues and construction agreements.

Kelvin regularly acts in major construction, corporate and commercial disputes for private and public listed companies, major international corporations, and financial institutions.

Julian regularly acts for both claimants and respondents in a wide range of employment tribunal disputes, where his clients include major national and international companies, banks, local authorities, police forces, unions, and healthcare providers.

Victory in complex oil refinery and pipelines dispute In one of the longest running and most technically complex cases to be referred to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), we obtained a major victory for our client, an Asian contractor, in a US$ 1.4 billion Spanish - language arbitration relating to the construction of an oil refinery and pipelines in Latin America.

Daniel has also represented major groups, such as Air France, Alcatel - Lucent, Caceis, and Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank in international disputes.

In his international and domestic arbitration practice, David has served as an arbitrator or tribunal chairman in many complex cases, multi-party international and domestic arbitrations including ad hoc arbitrations and those under the major international arbitration institutions including the American Arbitration Association, the International Center for Dispute Resolution, the London Court of International Arbitration and the International Chamberinternational and domestic arbitration practice, David has served as an arbitrator or tribunal chairman in many complex cases, multi-party international and domestic arbitrations including ad hoc arbitrations and those under the major international arbitration institutions including the American Arbitration Association, the International Center for Dispute Resolution, the London Court of International Arbitration and the International Chamberinternational and domestic arbitrations including ad hoc arbitrations and those under the major international arbitration institutions including the American Arbitration Association, the International Center for Dispute Resolution, the London Court of International Arbitration and the International Chamberinternational arbitration institutions including the American Arbitration Association, the International Center for Dispute Resolution, the London Court of International Arbitration and the International ChamberInternational Center for Dispute Resolution, the London Court of International Arbitration and the International ChamberInternational Arbitration and the International ChamberInternational Chamber of Commerce.

Perkins Coie represents clients in ad hoc international arbitrations as well as those conducted under the rules of every major arbitral institution, including investor - state arbitrations under the International Centre for the Settlement of Investminternational arbitrations as well as those conducted under the rules of every major arbitral institution, including investor - state arbitrations under the International Centre for the Settlement of InvestmInternational Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes.

legal advisory services to major airlines (domestic and international) debt recovery cargo and baggage claims claims arising from aviation accidents (including death) and loss of goods insurance disputes aviation regulations aircraft financing and leasing

Miami is a major international trade and finance center at the «portal to the Americas» and a well sought - after venue for resolving international disputes through arbitration.

A major international conference on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) will be held in Liverpool on the 27th / 28th June, 2018.

Our International Disputes team handles major international litigation matters on behalf of both foreign and domestic clients by advising clients on the unique procedures and strategies of U.S. litigation; the application of foreign law, treaties and regulations; strategies for settlement; and international arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution procedures, whereInternational Disputes team handles major international litigation matters on behalf of both foreign and domestic clients by advising clients on the unique procedures and strategies of U.S. litigation; the application of foreign law, treaties and regulations; strategies for settlement; and international arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution procedures, whereinternational litigation matters on behalf of both foreign and domestic clients by advising clients on the unique procedures and strategies of U.S. litigation; the application of foreign law, treaties and regulations; strategies for settlement; and international arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution procedures, whereinternational arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution procedures, where appropriate.

We have won many significant cases in U.S. courts, as well as before all major international arbitration forums including the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Dispinternational arbitration forums including the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment DispInternational Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment DispInternational Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).

While it is our goal to help clients avoid litigation wherever possible, our cross-office team collaborates to litigate high - stakes commercial and regulatory disputes in the major US and international venues.

In international investment treaty and commercial arbitrations in virtually every country in Central and South America under all major arbitral rules and institutions, including among others International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («international investment treaty and commercial arbitrations in virtually every country in Central and South America under all major arbitral rules and institutions, including among others International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («International Centre for Dispute Resolution («ICDR»);

Having previously been partner at two major international law firms, he has represented clients across a broad range of commercial, industrial and governmental sectors — including finance, insurance and disputes involving complex technology.

Our lawyers have decades of experience in handling disputes both as counsel and arbitrators under all major international arbitration rules, including:

Similarly, at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), which handles major investment treaty disputes often governed by bilateral investment treaties (BIT), oil, gas and mining accounted for 26 % of its disputes, while construction, power, water and transportation accounted for a further 37 % of its arbitration hDisputes (ICSID), which handles major investment treaty disputes often governed by bilateral investment treaties (BIT), oil, gas and mining accounted for 26 % of its disputes, while construction, power, water and transportation accounted for a further 37 % of its arbitration hdisputes often governed by bilateral investment treaties (BIT), oil, gas and mining accounted for 26 % of its disputes, while construction, power, water and transportation accounted for a further 37 % of its arbitration hdisputes, while construction, power, water and transportation accounted for a further 37 % of its arbitration hearings.