Sentences with phrase «majority of cases what»

Not exact matches

Upon returning to the workforce, Cheryl took the steps necessary to become a licensed financial services professional and quickly realized the vast majority of current and prospective retirees did not have access to the advice and resources required to make an educated decision on, what in most cases, will prove to be one of the most critical financial decisions they'll ever make; when and how to claim Social Security retirement benefits.

Move Away From Thinking like a Technologist - Develop Sympathy for Your User When crafting the user experience around the wants and needs of your user, Weekly has some crucial advice for founders: Ask yourself, What is the majority use case?

Do not make hasty generalizations and insult people claiming they don't know what they are talking about when in fact the statement they have made is applicable to the vast majority of the cases which they are discussing.

In case one were to think of a house, consisting of cellar, ground - floor and premier étage, so tenanted, or rather so arranged, that it was planned for a distinction of rank between the dwellers on the several floors; and in case one were to make a comparison between such a house and what it is to be a man — then unfortunately this is the sorry and ludicrous condition of the majority of men, that in their own house they prefer to live in the cellar.

Teaching (didaskein) is in a large majority of cases ethical instruction.2 Occasionally it seems to include what we should call apologetic, that is, the reasoned commendation of Christianity to persons interested but not yet convinced.

As Matthew points out, in the vast majority of cases, the word «abomination» (typically the Hebrew, toevah, which is used in Leviticus 18 and 20) refers to what the Israelites associated with the idolatrous practices of the Gentiles, leading Old Testament scholar Phyllis Bird to conclude that «it is not an ethical term, but a term for boundary making,» with «a basic sense of taboo.»

Normality is based on what is seen in the majority of cases.

Mr. Baako, who was reacting to the story during a discussion on Good morning Ghana on Metro TV yesterday, explained that in some cases, approval of vetted appointees are done on consensus and others not, so it was unnecessary for Nana Addo, to have gone to that extent to tell the Majority what to do considering their numbers.

But from what I can make of the case, it's rather more complicated and convoluted than that piece makes it - because Allighan was making false allegations in an attempt to cover his own tracks: http://www.markpack.org.uk/garry-allighan-expulsion-from-parliament/ It's a good point about Conway, though I think overall Parliament should be very cautious about voting to kick out MPs - as it only requires a simple majority vote.

«My amendment 4 is based on a simple point of principle, namely that a motion can be passed by a simple majority of one, as has been the case from time immemorial — from the very inception of our parliamentary process in what is sometimes described as the «mother of Parliaments».

There is a mechanism for dealing with the case when no Presidential candidate gets an overall majority of the electoral college, but that's not quite the same as what I think you're asking.

There has been a lot of speculation about whether Cuomo will help the Senate Democrats in their quest to re-take the majority this fall, particularly in the case of top targets like Grisanti, who did what Cuomo wanted and voted «yes» on marriage.

«I can't speak for what the DAs or attorney general will do, but the majority of the cases have possible felony charges,» she said.

The Coalition could hammer out as detailed a Spending Review as it can, whilst the Tories make it clear — either in footnotes or in a separate document — what they would do in case of a majority government after 2015.

But what the No campaign has shown us, I believe, is that arguing for one's case with vigour and conviction, as David Cameron, George Osborne, Sayeeda Warsi and the Conservative machine as a whole (at least for the final couple of months of the campaign) has done - serving as able understudies to Matthew Elliot's splendid overarching campaign, which magnificently secured a majority of Labour MPs (underlining the point that most of Labour are our opponents, not our enemy)- can shift opinion.

How much we decide to eat, what we eat and how much we choose to exercise will, in the majority of cases, trump our genes.

The number of women in that group was one - third of what one would expect based on female representation in the life sciences (the field that accounts for the overwhelming majority of ORI cases).

This is what one would hope and is very promising, suggesting that in the majority of cases, mitochondrial and nuclear inheritance can be successfully uncoupled.

So, what's the real reason that supplement companies use proprietary blends in the vast majority of cases?

The majority of the products lining the shelves at your local supplement store are packed full of ineffective ingredients that are NOT backed by any real scientific research... they're typically under - dosed, poorly formulated and have the specific ingredient amounts hidden behind «proprietary blends»... and in some cases they don't even actually contain what the label says.

It covers what causes various types of lower back pain, and why the vast majority of cases heal on their own... as long as you don't allow the pain to take over your life, stop you from exercising and keep you in bed.

Given that the Republicans control Congress, Republicans like vouchers, and in this case some Democrats are on board with the Republicans, the program is highly likely to live — no matter what the majority of the D.C. Council wants.

It doesn't matter what size or shape you are, you'll have head room to spare in the front of the Discovery — broadly speaking, that's the case in the vast majority of luxury SUVs.

If illusion is what is chosen to prop up self esteem, I think it is tragic in the majority of cases, because when the bubble pops, the fall is much more painful.

What they all have in common though, along with the heartbreaking nature of these cases, is that the overwhelming majority of these tragedies can be prevented.

If your dog just has elokomin fluke fever that does not progress to salmon poisoning disease, the symptoms may not be as severe but will eventually cause dehydration and an electrolyte imbalance, which is what causes death in the majority of cases.

So we go with what is second - best, which in this case means observing the fact that the majority of evidence, modeling and deductive reasoning points in the same direction.

So, in case there is now or there will be some newbie to these arguments who may have been confused by the disinformation you (and Memphis) have been producing here, here is an example from a genuine study to remind of what the AGWSF fisics passes off as real physics, as used generally in all the variety of science studies because this has been introduced into the education system and, apart from the applied scientists in the field who can spot this is fake, the majority simply take it as if real physics basics:

A recent report by CDP in partnership with We Mean Business found that although the large majority of companies have set targets to reduce emissions, in many cases the level of ambition and time horizon fall short of what is needed for business to deliver on the goals of the Paris Agreement.

It's stupid to ignore what the vast majority of science is saying, just in case science is right.

As a result, she thinks that the majority has left unresolved the issue of what constitutional standards should be applied in cases of extradition to third countries.

The most pressing problem when it comes to access to justice is the vast majority of people don't know what to do in case of personal legal issues.

In the vast majority of cases, manufacturers, retailers and other participants in the chain of commerce do what they can to ensure this is true.

And before his colorful turn of phrase in Windsor, Justice Scalia created an even more vivid mental picture with his dissent in a criminal case.14 Justice Scalia deplored what he saw as the court's ever - expanding definition of what constitutes «violent felonies» under the Armed Career Criminal Act, calling the statute vague and the majority's expansion of it a «tutti - frutti opinion.»

What interests me is that the U.S. court decision is unlikely to have any real impact on the state of the law (though it may cause lawyers headaches in having to screen the large mass of cases), given the fact that the vast majority of cases are never cited more than a very few times — DNA lines, as it were, that die out as «unfit.»

Instead, since the vast majority of criminal cases result in plea agreements, what you need most is a lawyer skilled at negotiating such agreements, who can help you decide whether you should accept the prosecutor's deal or take your chances at trial.

«What's interesting is the Twitter account at issue, the TTC had very little control — if any — over the posts that were made,» Mark Mendl, partner at Baker & McKenzie LLP, says, adding this is a new direction as the vast majority of cases out there have dealt with employee posts to social media, not posts by the general public to a company - held account.

The majority of lawsuits in Connecticut are settled before they get to trial, but what happens in your case depends on the facts, the law and the parties involved.

While the Baylor University decision does not answer the question of when and in what circumstances the Board will recognize an employer's right to lawfully require confidentiality in settlement agreements and other agreements that where they would have been found to interfere with employees» Section 7 rights, the tea leaves more than suggest a change in Board law as soon as the Board returns to five members and an appropriate case is before the new majority.

To start a witch hunt on an entire industry on the back of a small number of fraudsters misses a point — what about the large majority of honest claimants who would be forced to soak up prohibitively costly small claims proceedings, or else represent themselves, without the expertise required to develop a convincing case for the court?

This type of no - fault divorce (irretrievable breakdown) is what happens in a overwhelming majority of divorce cases.

â $ œJudges are going to ask a lot of questions, particularly appellate judges â $ ¦ and they actually expect answers, and they need answers, and they want answers, and lawyers who donâ $ ™ t answer the question, which is the large majority [of lawyers], lose points, because what it tells me is there is no good answerâ $» your case is indefensible, â $ Michel said.

Although a personal injury lawyer usually provides a legal bill based on a percentage of recovery from ICBC, in the vast majority of cases, the lawyer will definitely obtain an offer from ICBC well in excess of what you can do on your own.

But as far as the allegedly lewd comment was concerned, despite the tribunal's assertion of the band of reasonable responses test, had it not, for example, in expressing a view on what a majority of the public might have thought, in effect substituted its own view for that of the employer (as in the EAT cases discussed above)?

Also in this section (pages 7 - 9 of the slip opinion), the Court applied what I would describe a «realistic litigator» analysis (which Justice Scalia often employs to reject claims of «future bad law» effects) to habeas lawyers» likely moves, and expressed the majority's «doubt that any more judicial time will be wasted» than would be the case under the dissent's alternative vision.

Looking a bit more closely at what lawyers actually do in this high value phase, in the vast majority of cases it will take two forms — advising and creating documents.

Busy barristers with loads of clients are happier to settle their cases on reasonable terms far earlier than are barristers who are terrified that they do not now and will not in future have enough clients to pay the overhead, the student debt, and provide what is for the vast majority of lawyers a middle class living.

What is to prevent some Silicon Valley genius developing an algorithm using a database of gazillions of reported cases that will answer most, if not the majority, of legal issues down the road.

As in our case, a majority of insurers raised rates because of the Hurricane Harvey auto losses, so we stuck with our company and we'll see what happens next year.

In the vast majority of cases, this is premeditated fraud and the culprits are fully aware of what they are doing at the time.