In addition, the vast
majority of religious people I know don't even contemplate this (which tells you their pastor, Sunday school teacher, etc. isn't bringing it up).
All of these approaches are valid and rational and reasonable, and based on the fact that this man's actions are inconsistent both with the non-religious person's experiences, and what the non-religious person sees the vast
majority of religious people doing, we can say that this man was most likely delusional.
The majority of religious people are remaining silent on the rapid increase in incarceration and even more quiet on the unfair, racially imbalanced and bankrupting threat of America's drug laws.
the majority of religious people have NO training in esoteric philosophy and therefore fail at understanding the true message of Christ.
Not exact matches
Majority of Atheists don't understand the purpose
of religion, while on the other side most
religious people don't understand their religion.
The Vatican is NOT talking about those
people who are the
majority of Catholic
religious.
Opus Dei is a
religious order founded in 1928 and made up
of roughly 90,000 members, the vast
majority of whom are lay
people.
Actually, it stands to reason that if there are 7 billion
people in the world and a
majority of them are
religious, then the few that aren't
religious CAN be considered «special».
The
majority of LGBT
people and supporters accept a large number
of people, because they see how often
religious groups do not.
Were
religious people promoting peace when they voted down gay marriage (a civil rights issue, opponents
of which will be viewed in the same light as the opponents against civil rights in the 50s and 60s) You are just so comfortable in the
majority, you can't see the prejudice and bias you put on
people that aren't like you.
That's true and a
majority of people who are into such major events (and also large
religious gatherings) are
religious and superstitious and love to PANIC!
People like you really have to come to grips with the fact that a
majority in this country oppose your attempt to impose your
religious beliefs on us through the force
of law.
As a world leader for freedom and the protection
of basic human rights, the United States should take every opportunity to advocate for
people — including Americans here at home — to think, believe, and act according to their
religious belief whether they belong to a minority or
majority religion in their nation.»
The Dutch
people are tolerant, he told me, and hence in Amsterdam, there are no ethnic or
religious minorities, an achievement made possible by the fact that although a
majority of residents are
of Dutch descent, only around 25 percent call themselves Christian.
I assumed this hard - core complementarian Calvinist was just going along with the
majority, just making the easiest decisions, just bumbling along without considering the views or experiences
of other
people so that his safe little
religious world would remain intact.
Soon, the
majority of people are going to see the
religious for what they are.
But do you think that maybe the
majority of the body
of religious in general (
religious being the
majority of the planet, and about 85 %
of the USA) are decent folk, and not like these politicians, and that maybe you are offending a lot
of good
people.
I would like to suggest the opposite, that not only in leadership, but in the
people inside the church, outside
of the church, and in the
majority of all humanity, secular and
religious, there lies a profound and deep fear
of powerlessness.
It's their way or the highway and to compromise is to show a lack
of faith which means you have one side willing to make exceptions for all
peoples religions as long as they don't force it on others, and the
religious side that says making exceptions or compromising is against their religion so if they are not a
majority in the democracy they instead decide to play obstructionist.
A lot
of muslims are nice and they're just normal
people, but the vast
religious majority hates non-muslims.
Author John Charles Cooper, dean
of academic affairs at Winebrenner Theological Seminary, sums up the situation: «
People do feel that religion is losing its influence on society, and they may be right — but the majority of people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good religious
People do feel that religion is losing its influence on society, and they may be right — but the
majority of people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good religious
people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good
religious books.
, I was concerned about the rise
of the
religious right, the moral
majority — not because
of the politics, but because a lot
of people think that's the way to make America a Christian country again, whatever that means.
The task for the morning was to identify the
religious feelings
of people we work with, especially among the excluded
majority.
Religious people seem to think that since they are a
majority, and their brand
of belief is dominant (if not examined closely), everyone else can just look the other way or close their ears.
The vast
majority of people in the country do not want to turn this into 1 giant
religious country!
When
religious people stop attempting to codify their
religious beliefs into our laws just because they are the
majority and think they have some kind
of divine right to do so, then they wouldn't need to be bad mouthed.
Eberstadt writes: «But the
majority of people, to continue this complementary
religious anthropology, do not re-invent the theological wheel this way.
Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has made a compelling case for the creative and culturally dynamic role that
religious minorities can play, even in societies where the
majority of people deeply oppose their
religious inclinations, as was the case for much
of the history
of the Jewish
people in....
What I find funny about your conclusions is that the vast
majority of atheist
persons did not come from atheist households but came from
religious households, so the retention rates don't really matter.
majority of people who claim to be, «
religious,» are hypocrites and bend and twist the words
of there religion to fit there own needs, and use it as a means to an end for all types
of things.
The number
of people that now call themselves non-
religious has increased so rapidly that the
majority of non-believers were at some point
religious.
One
of the many attacks on our country from the
Religious Right is the claim that our country is a Christian Nation... not just that the
majority of people are Christians, but that the country itself was founded by Christians, for Christians.
From reading the posts on this blog, along with other posts on other blogs, it seems that the
majority of people against abo - rtions are also
religious and against bigger government.
Faith in Public Life:
People of Faith Support Minimum Wage Raise
Majorities of all
religious groups favor increasing the minimum wage from $ 7.25 an hour to $ 10.00 an hour, including black Protestants (87 %), Catholics (73 %), Americans who are religiously unaffiliated (68 %), white mainline Protestants (61 %) and white evangelical Protestants (61 %).
On the basis
of the
majority of the identified perpetrators
of September 11 being Saudi Arabians, including the alleged plotter and financier, Osama bin Laden, one could conclude that what has been behind the September 11 incident, and some
of the earlier incidents
of terror, is the
religious worldview
of the Wahhabiya (ahl - al - tawhid «
People of Unity») movement.
Members
of these
religious bodies today are children
of the
people who, coming to
majority after World War II, finally lost the capacity as citizens to be genuine political actors in America.
I think the only reason why a
majority of people believe the
religious nonsense if because they have been brainwashed since birth to believe this crap.
Had the
majority allowed the definition
of marriage to be left to the political process — as the Constitution requires — the
People could have considered the
religious liberty implications
of deviating from the traditional definition as part
of their deliberative process.
«As several
of the dissenting opinions pointed out, though, the
majority opinion did not very strongly affirm the
religious freedom
of persons and organizations that for
religious reasons believe in the historic conception
of marriage,» said Carlson - Thies.
I find it difficult to believe God / Jesus would approve
of tattoos but whatever, the amount
of people who are truly christian is very low anyhow, If you ask me the desire to tattoo
religious imagery onto yourself is quite shallow / conceited and I'm almost certain these
people are just pretending to be something they're not in an effort to fit in or be «cool», like the
majority of so - called «Christians» Jesus will turn away from them and will «profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.»
From what I've seen, there isn't much difference in
religious people and atheists because
majority of atheists come from
religious backgrounds (parents, grandparents), so their moral system is something inherited from them.
Despite the denials,
majority of people raise their kids
religious (but not so
religious) and this includes ALL religions!
The
majority of 1700 comments here are posted by atheists attacking
religious people
As noted, the
majority of the audience
of religious television programs are
people who are already actively involved in a local church and there is therefore little empirical evidence to support the contention that
religious programs on television are «draining
people out
of the local churches.»
I think the
majority of Christians, and most
religious people, are absolutely crazy.
They are not now convincing the huge
majority that to take the life
of an embryo in order to save the life
of a mother is simple «murder,» as the bumper - stickers (but not most
people in the reasoned,
religious, Christian and even Catholic traditions before 1973) would have it.
While others in the burgeoning Christian Right wanted to organize only among their own flocks, the Moral
Majority chief pushed an idea called co-belligerency:
people of different
religious backgrounds setting aside theological differences to pursue common political goals.
Yet the great
majority of people in the world live under regimes that are either constitutional theocracies — where religion is formally enshrined in the state — or where
religious affiliation is a pillar
of collective political identity.
«The vast
majority of people in Britain are not members
of any local church,
religious group or community, and so to lay such emphasis on
religious identities as being the ones most important for encouraging voluntary work or community building is misguided.»
BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson, who was on the steering group for the review, commented, «Government surveys have suggested that a
majority or perhaps even two - thirds
of young
people today are not
religious, so for
religious education to remain relevant it is vital that this large group's beliefs are taught about alongside those
of their
religious peers.