The proposed change, extending the probationary period from two to three years, would align California with the vast
majority of teacher tenure laws throughout the country, which award tenure after three to five years of teaching.
Not exact matches
-- A solid
majority of voters surveyed — 62 percent — said they agreed with Cuomo's proposal to make public school
teachers eligible for
tenure after five years, instead
of the current three - year requirement.
For example, in May the
majority of the
tenured teachers at Locke High School, one
of LAUSD's most troubled schools, voted to become an independent charter school.
Similarly, most parents (63 %) support using student test scores in deciding whether to award
tenure — again, a policy opposed by the
majority of teachers (62 %).
This may help explain why a
majority of the public opposes
teacher tenure.
But, surprisingly, a
majority of teachers do not favor the status quo
of most states, under which most
teachers receive
tenure as a matter
of course without explicit consideration
of student - achievement data.
California law states that charter conversions can happen when a
majority of tenured teachers submit a petition.
One
of the hottest tickets was a session led by Charlotte Danielson, the architect
of a
teacher - evaluation model being used in a
majority of New Jersey school districts as part
of the state's new
tenure - reform law, which aims to hold
teachers more accountable for student performance.
In addition, «27 states [now] require annual evaluations for all
teachers, compared to just 15 states in 2009;» «17 states include student growth as the preponderant criterion in
teacher evaluations, up from only four states in 2009... An additional 18 states include growth measures as a «significant» criterion in
teacher evaluations;» «23 states require that evidence
of teacher performance be used in
tenure decisions [whereas no] state had such a policy in 2009;» «19 states require that
teacher performance is considered in reduction in force decisions;» and the «
majority of states (28) now articulate that ineffectiveness is grounds for
teacher dismissal» (p. 6).
Recent polling shows a
majority of the public opposes
teacher tenure.
In a 2 - 1 decision, with Judge Chris Dillon agreeing in part with the
majority, the three - judge appeals court panel found that the repeal
of teacher tenure in 2013, a bill signed by Gov. Pat McCrory, amounted to an illegal taking
of contract and property rights.
But a review
of the best evidence on
teachers» sentiments shows that educators are not unhappy because they resent the new emphasis on
teacher evaluations, a key element
of President Obama's Race to the Top program; in fact, according to a separate survey
of 10,000 public school
teachers from Scholastic and the Gates Foundation, the
majority support using measures
of student learning to assess
teachers, and the mean number
of years
teachers believe they should devote to the classroom before being assessed for
tenure is 5.4, a significant increase from the current national average
of 3.1 years.
In 2016, pro-test education reformers were also frustrated to learn that despite the widespread implementation
of new evaluation systems under Obama's
tenure, the overwhelming
majority of teachers were still receiving high ratings.
Once
tenure was granted, little attention, except in the most progressive districts, was paid to
teacher effect data for the vast
majority of teachers.
The vast
majority of teachers typically have been granted
tenure and rated as satisfactory.
Teach Plus stated that a 2015 poll
of more than 500 California
teachers, the
majority wanted
teachers to demonstrate effectiveness for a minimum
of five years in order to earn
tenure.
Dorothy Strickland, retired professor
of Rutgers University and a member
of the state board
of education, said she is optimistic about the findings, which show the
majority of teachers, three - quarters, were rated at the levels required to retain their
tenure.