Besides, in a nation in which the great
majority of voters describe themselves as religious, religious belief will usually be the background — even if frequently unstated — of our policy debates.
Not exact matches
They include: the command
of the sovereign; the
majority of the
voters; the principle
of utility; the Supreme Court's varying interpretations
of the Constitution's great but ambiguous phrases; the subtle implications
of platitudinous shared values like «equality» or «autonomy»; and even a hypothetical social contract that abstract persons might adopt in the imaginary «original position»
described by John Rawls.
Each election, they invent names such as «Essex man» or «Worcester woman'to
describe archetypal
voters representative
of marginal constituencies necessary to win a parliamentary
majority.
In the court's
majority opinion, Kagan
described the two - part analysis utilized by the high court when plaintiffs allege racial gerrymandering as follows: «First, the plaintiff must prove that «race was the predominant factor motivating the legislature's decision to place a significant number
of voters within or without a particular district.»