Not exact matches
In his
opinion, the
majority of American companies today are far too
focused on short - term profits to realize the importance of long - term gains.
I don't put much store in
opinion polls, but if true it would only indicate roughly what you would expect to happen at this point in the parliament - 32 % isn't that much lower than Labour got in the 2005 General Election and all it would suggest is that the Liberal Democrats are having a reversal - tactical voting could see them holding onto many of their current seats, indeed it is even possible that if they got 17 % of the vote that if it
focused in an area that they could actually end up with more seats, where the switches in support are occuring is crucial - if they are
focused then if the Conservative Party were to get 39 % then it might still result in them getting fewer seats than Labour or in extremis winning a 150 seat
majority or so?
In considering whether Arizona was meeting the requirements of the EEOA, Justice Samuel Alito's
majority opinion faulted the district court and the Ninth Circuit for
focusing on the «narrow question» of funding, and ignoring whether managerial and instructional reforms had brought the state into compliance.
The
majority opinion in Marakah is a reaffirmation of digital privacy principles and policy for the twenty - first century by keeping the
focus where it should be — on people and their conversations — and not on the physical places where they happen.
While the view supported by Ian Binnie's
opinion and Moldaver J.'s dissent
focus on the absurdity of going to the high court just one day after rejoining the Barreau du Québec, a different absurdity was pointed out by Professors Michael Plaxton and Carissima Mathen, in an article cited by the
majority, a point raised by the Attorney General of Québed in oral argument:
The
majority opinion in Trial Lawyers is a fairly abstract one, in the sense that its
focus is very much on the legal issues.
Justice Antonin Scalia's
majority opinion stated the rule was not «narrowly tailored» to preserve judicial impartiality because it
focused on issues instead of on particular litigants.