Not exact matches
«One does not
want to own part of a company when the
majority shareholder is running out of money.»
They are asking for policies that most well run companies have adopted; things like
majority vote standards, so directors are only elected to the board if a
majority of
shareholders want them there.
Elliott
wants to keep Genish, appointed by Vivendi, but he told Britain's Sunday Telegraph that his position would be untenable if Elliott and its allies secured a
majority of board seats at a
shareholder vote on Friday.
Because most ESOPs in closely held companies take place in situations where the founding owner
wants to retire and cash out of the business, the issue of diluting profit per share and diluting the ownership and governance rights of
majority shareholders is not a material issue in these cases.
Everton
majority shareholder Farhad Moshiri told The Mirror late last year that Napoli «
wanted # 60m».
The problem I think Ozil has is that he
wants to win things (unlike the
majority shareholder).
In fact,
majority of the
shareholders did not
want to sell their shares to Kroenke including Bracewell - Smith and Fiszman.
The
majority shareholder is to blame without doubt, he is involved because he
wants to make money, he employed gazidis who's job it is to make him money, he has also kept le fraud in employment who's employed to make sure the team are competitive on the pitch in all competitions via coaching and tactics neither of which he does.
I can not understand why any of the board sold to Enos — the idea was always to have no one with a
majority share holding, and although Enos backed the new stadium, if the original
shareholders wanted to sell up, I'm sure they could've found others to sell to, who would've also done so, without giving anyone a
majority shareholding.
kronkes influence over the club is minimal at best how many decisions does he actually make in the public club domain that we all know of, i am only guessing here but just because he is
majority shareholder it doesn't mean he can just do what he
wants without the other board members say so, i suppose the rest of the board would vote him out of power and liquidate his shares if he did something really wrong like leveraged the club against a big debt.
anyway the club is run independent of his ownership it is arsenal holdings plc that runs the club not stan kronke he is just the
majority shareholder in the club so he just has his money in the club not investment purposes but just as a
shareholder just like in any business
shareholders want to make sure there value is increasing in the clubs value so that the club is doing well.
No Naija, the board or the
majority of them,
wanted Wenger «relieved» of his position last season but Kroenke being
majority shareholder over ruled them and gave Wenger the 2 year extension.
And any businessman shellin out money to own it or become
majority shareholder, is doing so because they
want to profit from it... * NewsFlash Usmanov and Dangote are «BUSINESSMEN»...
Former Arsenal forward Thierry Henry is reportedly
wanted back at the club by Josh Kroenke, son of
majority shareholder Stan.
Majority shareholder Stan Kroenke is apparently preparing a new two year deal for the Frenchman which he
wants signed by October.
Should the OSC incorporate
majority voting into new rules, she
wants to see that discretion removed to give full effect to the
shareholder vote.